I havedn't thought there might beat there was any connections between Napoleon III and the Meiji Emperor before, because they werehad lived too far away from each other.

Both of them were emperors in, one of France and Japan separatelythe other of Japan, in the 1860s.

Since this article I am going to writeing is not serious academic writing, I will not give an accurate date.

I saw a post from a website describing the movie _The Last Samurai_, which was a Hollywood blockbuster stared byring Tome Cruise.

The author gave us a true story behind the movie which legot me interested in why Napoleon III was against the Meiji Emperor in the 1860s.

At that time, the Meiji emperor lived in Kyoto while the Shogunate was adjacent to Tokyo.

The Emperor inof Japan has only been in a ceremonial position for over 1,000 years, on the contrary, while the shogunate held political and military power at that time.

He was involved in a civil war in Japan and, fortunately, he failed, or else the Meiji Restoration would have failed, too.

Napoleon III, Meiji Emperor, and the Shogunate (1)

I haven'tnever thought there might be any connections between Napoleon III and the Meiji Emperor before, because they were too far from each other.

Both of them were emperors, in France and Japan separatrespectively, in the 1860s.

The "respectively" isn't required, but it makes it clearer and feel more natural.

Since this article I am going to write is not serious academic writing, I will noon't give an accurate dates.

There are two dates, that of Napoleon II's coup and the Meiji Restoration, so you would use the plural. "will not" is accurate but most native speakers will use contractions where possible.

I saw a post from a website describing the movie The Last Samurai, which was a Hollywood blockbuster stared byring Tome Cruise.

Or "starred in by", "featuring"

I haven't seen the movie, before,ut I will see it one day, howeverone day.

You can drop the second verb since you already made your meaning clear.

The author gave us a trueexplained the real story behind the movie which legot me interested in why Napoleon III was againstcompared to the Meiji Emperor in the 1860s.

At thate time, the Meiji emperor lived in Kyoto while the Shogunate was adjacent tolocated in Tokyo.

"Adjacent to" actually means next to, which doesn't make sense here.

EThe emperor in Japan hasd only been in a ceremonial position for over 1,000 years, on the contrary,while the shogunate held the real political and military power.

Napoleon III won battles after battles across Europe around the same period.

He was involved in athe civil war in Japan, fortunately, he failed, or else the Meiji Restoration would have failed too.