Beha_lau's avatar
Beha_lau

July 27, 2025

0
My Latest Reading : Canadians don't buy US products

Hello everybody,

Today, i read a new English article, that talk US products.
In Canada, many consumer are not buying American things.
These things are becoming very expensive for Canadians.

It's because of President Trump who wanted to increase the price. So Canada puts several tax on US products, for example : It puts now a 25% tax on US alcohol.

This situation makes a big loss of costumers and visitors in US. Fewer canadians visit it, and Europeans too.
The United States, may lose around 90 billion dollars this year.

I have a friend who are traveling to New york city the next week. After his journey, i will ask he : "how much the life is expensive over there?"

I have been to New york city, i have travel over there 2 years ago.
I have make two big trips this year. My first trip was on north of vitenam, after that, on New york.

I liked New york, the history of immigration, the Brooklyn bridge whaaaaaaou. I have a lot memories. But i did not like already the expensive life, so now, i can hate that.

The vietnam, i love love love this country. I hope can go again.

Thank you reading.


Bonjour tout le monde,

Aujourd'hui, j'ai lu un nouveau article en anglais, celui-ci parle des produits américains.

Au canada, des consommateurs n'achètent plus des produits américains.
Ces produits sont en train de devenir hors de prix pour les canadiens.
C'est à cause du président Trump, celui-ci a voulu augmenter les prix. Alors les canadiens, mettent des taxes, comme par exemple : 25% sur l'alcool américaine.
Cette situation a engendré une grosse perte de consommateurs et de touristes pour les Etats-Unis.
Moins de voyageurs canadiens, et même européens...

Corrections

My Latest Reading : Canadians dDon't bBuy US p.S. Products

Words in a title should always be capitalized, unless it's the, and, but, or to

Hello everybody,


Today,
iI read a new English article,article in English that talks about US products.

Depends what you're writing this for, but "hello everybody" is a bit informal.
English article sounds like the article is from England.
"Talks about" is a bit informal, depending on what you want I would replace with "discusses".

In Canada, many consumers are not buying American thingproducts.

These things are becoming verytoo expensive for Canadians.

You could connect the first and last sentences to seem more fluid.
In Canada, many consumers are not buying American products because they are becoming too expensive for Canadians.

It'This is because of President Trump, who wanted to increase the price.s (of various goods).¶

words in parentheses are optional but make it sound better

SoIn response, Canada puts several taxes on US.S. (American) products, f. For example : It, it now puts now a 25% tax on US.S. alcohol.

"So" is grammatically correct, but a better transition would be to explain why Canada did this.

This situation makeshas led to a bsignificant loss of costumers and visitors in UCandian consumers of American goods and Canadian tourism in the U.S.

Fewer cCanadians visit it, and Europeans too.visit the United States.

Unclear what you are talking about.

TAs a result, the United States, may (is projected to) lose around 90 billion dollars this year.

I have a friend who areis traveling to New yYork cCity the next week.

Cities are always capitalized, conjugation error with "friend"

After his journey, iI will ask he : "how much the life isim how expensive overlife there?" is.

I have been to New yYork cCity, i have: I travel overed there 2two years ago.

I have makde two big trips this year.

My first trip was onto the north of vitenam,Vietnam, and after that, ton New yYork.

I likedwas very impressed with New yYork, theespecially its history of immigration, and the Brooklyn bBridge! whaaaaaaou.

I have a lot of (wonderful, beautiful) memories.

But iHowever, I did not like already the expensive life, so now, i can hate that.style.

The vietnam, i love love love this country.On the other hand, I absolutely loved Vietnam (combine with next sentence)

I...and hope I can go agaireturn to visit soon.

Thank you for reading.

My Latest Reading : Canadians dDon't bBuy US pProducts

changed it to title case

Hello everybody,


Today,
iI read a new English article, that talked about US products.

"I" is always capitalized when it refers to oneself.

also, we usually say that an article talks "about" a topic or "is/was about" a topic

In Canada, many consumers are not buying American things.

the "s" very often turns singular nouns to plural nouns

there is also a less common way to only use singular nouns to talk about a group of people, like:

In Canada, the consumer is not buying American things.

or even less common:

In Canada, many a consumer is not buying American things.

These things are becoming very expensive for Canadians.

It's because of President Trump who wanted to increase the price.

So Canada puts several taxes on US products,; for example : I, it puts now a 25% tax on US alcohol.

if you mean the past tense, then it would be "So Canada put several taxes"

the semicolon (;) can act like a period when separating independent clauses

you could also say:

So Canada puts several taxes on US products. For example, it puts now a 25% tax on US alcohol.

This situation makes for a big loss of costumers and visitors in the US.

"make for" or "makes for" can be used to mean "causes" or "results in"

usually, people say "the" US, but I don't think this deserves too much concern

Fewer cCanadians visit it, and Europeans too.

The United States, may lose around 90 billion dollars this year.

the comma was unnecessary

I have a friend who areis traveling to New yYork cCity the next week.

city names are always capitalized

"are" corresponds to a plural subject (I have two friends who are traveling...)

"is" corresponds to a singular subject (I have a/one friend who is traveling...)

After his journey, iI will ask he :im, "hHow much the life is expensive is life over there?"

quotes or dialogue lines are usually introduced with a comma as in the correction

"how much the life is expensive over there" could also be rephrased as "how much life costs over there"

I have been to New yYork cCity, i have; I travel overed there 2 years ago.

sometimes it is a good idea to separate independent clauses with a semicolon or a period

I have makde two big trips this year.

made means in the past

My first trip was onto the north of viteVietnam,; after that, I went ton New yYork.

or "to northern Vietnam"

I liked New yYork, the's history of immigration, and the Brooklyn bBridge whaaaaaaouooooooow.

your original sentence has three items:

1. New York
2. immigration history
3. Brooklyn Bridge

Since numbers 2 and 3 belong to New York, the list does not have to be written the original way

I have a lot memories.

But iI did not like already the expensive life, so now, i canthe high cost of living; I hate that.

"cost of living" is a normal phrase when talking about how much money one needs to live somewhere

"so now, I can hate that." sounds a bit unnatural, and the suggestion addresses that

The vAbout Vietnam, iI love love love this country.

"about" helps introduce the new topic

you could also try:

Also, I love love love Vietnam.

I hope can go again.

Thank you for reading.

you could also try something like:

I appreciate you reading this.

Feedback

Nice job, mainly just some tricky grammar points I noticed.

My LThe latest Reading article I read: Canadians don't buy US products

"Reading" has a bit of a connotation of assigned work, e.g. homework or a prepared speech at a ceremony

Hello everybody,


Today,
iI read a new English (language) article, that talks about US products.

"language" is optional, but it helps to distinguish between an article written in English, and an article from England.

The word "I" is always capitalised.

In Canada, many consumers are not buying American things.

"many" means there's more than one, so it should be the plural "consumers"

It's because of President Trump who wanted to increase the prices.

More than one good, so more than one price.

So Canada puts several taxes on US products, for example : It now puts now a a 25% taxriff on US alcohol.

This situation makesis causing a big loss of coustuomers and visitors infor the US.

US as an adjective doesn't take "the", but US as a noun does take "the" since it's short for a collection (the united states), so it's treated grammatically as a collective noun rather than a proper noun. This sort of happens with other countries when their full names are spelled out. e.g. it's "China" (not "the China") but it is "the People's Republic of China" (or "the PRC"). The US is just the exception where the country's regularly used name is also treated this way.

Fewer cCanadians visit it, and fewer Europeans too.

The United States, may lose around 90 billion dollars this year.

The pause after the topic here is very unnatural so I removed it.

I have a friend who areis traveling to New yYork cCity the next week.

"I have friends who are travelling"
"I have a friend who is travelling"

Watch out for verbs which also need to change when combined with plurals.

"the next week" vs "next week" can be a little tricky. "the next week" refers to the week after some previously discussed time period. "next week" without the "the" refers to the week after the current week. Since you haven't mentioned a time period yet, "the next week" is wrong.

After his journey, iI will ask he im: "hHow much the life is expensive is life over there?"

I have been to New yYork city, i have; I traveled over there 2 years ago.

"I have traveled over there" is fine, but note it has to be the past tense of the verb. However, native speakers would use the simpler expression with the simple past tense here.

I have makde two big trips this year.

"made" is the past tense of "make"

My first trip was onto the north of viteVietnam, after that, ton New yYork.

Note that when captialising names, every word within the name gets capitalised.

I liked New yYork, the history of immigration, the Brooklyn bridge whaaaaaaouoah.

I have a lot of memories.

But iI already did not like already the expensive lifecost of living, so now, iI can hate that.

The vVietnam, iI love love love this country.

Going back to the previous example "Vietnam" is a proper noun so doesn't take a "the" (while "the Socialist Republic of Vietnam" would, if you spelled it out in full)

I hope I can go again.

Thank you for reading.

Hello everybody,


Today,
iI read a new English article, that talks about US products.

I is always capitalised in English, because "talk" refers to "a new English article" which is singular you use "talks" (he/ she / it talks). "Talk" never occurs by itself it always has a word with it to convey who you are talking "to" or "about" in this case it's about because the article is "about" something.

In Canada, many consumers are not buying American things.

"many" implies multiple so you have to use a plural form for "consumer"

So Canada puts several taxes on US products, for example : Iit puts now a 25% tax on US alcohol.

"several" implies more than one so "tax" has to be plural. I removed the "s" from put because this sentence makes more sense in your story if it is past tense. Canada did something in response to what the US did and you're explain how that happened so past simple makes more grammatical sense.

Fewer cCanadians visit it, and Europeans too.

The United States, may lose around 90 billion dollars this year.

I have a friend who areis traveling to New yYork cCity the next week.

"is" because friend is singular. next week is not a noun so you don't need "the" in front of it.

After his journey, iI will ask heim : "how much thare life is expensiveving costs over there?"

I have been to New yYork cCity, i haveI travel overed there 2 years ago.

I have makde two big trips this year.

My first trip was onto the north of viteVietnam, after that, ton New yYork.

I liked New yYork, the history of immigration, the Brooklyn bridge whaaaaaaou.

I have a lot of memories.

But iI already did not like already the expensive life, so now, iI can hate that.

The vAs for Vietnam, iI love love love this country.

I hope I can go again.

Thank you for reading.

Feedback

I think overall it's easy to understand what you mean to say but you need to pay more attention to grammar, specifically plurals and prepositions. In terms of spelling consider place names and the spelling conventions around those.

My Latest Reading : Canadians don't buy US products


My LThe latest Reading article I read: Canadians don't buy US products

"Reading" has a bit of a connotation of assigned work, e.g. homework or a prepared speech at a ceremony

My Latest Reading : Canadians dDon't bBuy US pProducts

changed it to title case

My Latest Reading : Canadians dDon't bBuy US p.S. Products

Words in a title should always be capitalized, unless it's the, and, but, or to

Hello everybody, Today, i read a new English article, that talk US products.


Hello everybody,


Today,
iI read a new English article, that talks about US products.

I is always capitalised in English, because "talk" refers to "a new English article" which is singular you use "talks" (he/ she / it talks). "Talk" never occurs by itself it always has a word with it to convey who you are talking "to" or "about" in this case it's about because the article is "about" something.

Hello everybody,


Today,
iI read a new English (language) article, that talks about US products.

"language" is optional, but it helps to distinguish between an article written in English, and an article from England. The word "I" is always capitalised.

Hello everybody,


Today,
iI read a new English article, that talked about US products.

"I" is always capitalized when it refers to oneself. also, we usually say that an article talks "about" a topic or "is/was about" a topic

Hello everybody,


Today,
iI read a new English article,article in English that talks about US products.

Depends what you're writing this for, but "hello everybody" is a bit informal. English article sounds like the article is from England. "Talks about" is a bit informal, depending on what you want I would replace with "discusses".

In Canada, many consumer are not buying American things.


In Canada, many consumers are not buying American things.

"many" implies multiple so you have to use a plural form for "consumer"

In Canada, many consumers are not buying American things.

"many" means there's more than one, so it should be the plural "consumers"

In Canada, many consumers are not buying American things.

the "s" very often turns singular nouns to plural nouns there is also a less common way to only use singular nouns to talk about a group of people, like: In Canada, the consumer is not buying American things. or even less common: In Canada, many a consumer is not buying American things.

In Canada, many consumers are not buying American thingproducts.

These things are becoming very expensive for Canadians.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

These things are becoming verytoo expensive for Canadians.

You could connect the first and last sentences to seem more fluid. In Canada, many consumers are not buying American products because they are becoming too expensive for Canadians.

It's because of President Trump who wanted to increase the price.


It's because of President Trump who wanted to increase the prices.

More than one good, so more than one price.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

It'This is because of President Trump, who wanted to increase the price.s (of various goods).¶

words in parentheses are optional but make it sound better

So Canada puts several tax on US products, for example : It puts now a 25% tax on US alcohol.


So Canada puts several taxes on US products, for example : Iit puts now a 25% tax on US alcohol.

"several" implies more than one so "tax" has to be plural. I removed the "s" from put because this sentence makes more sense in your story if it is past tense. Canada did something in response to what the US did and you're explain how that happened so past simple makes more grammatical sense.

So Canada puts several taxes on US products, for example : It now puts now a a 25% taxriff on US alcohol.

So Canada puts several taxes on US products,; for example : I, it puts now a 25% tax on US alcohol.

if you mean the past tense, then it would be "So Canada put several taxes" the semicolon (;) can act like a period when separating independent clauses you could also say: So Canada puts several taxes on US products. For example, it puts now a 25% tax on US alcohol.

SoIn response, Canada puts several taxes on US.S. (American) products, f. For example : It, it now puts now a 25% tax on US.S. alcohol.

"So" is grammatically correct, but a better transition would be to explain why Canada did this.

This situation makes a big loss of costumers and visitors in US.


This situation makesis causing a big loss of coustuomers and visitors infor the US.

US as an adjective doesn't take "the", but US as a noun does take "the" since it's short for a collection (the united states), so it's treated grammatically as a collective noun rather than a proper noun. This sort of happens with other countries when their full names are spelled out. e.g. it's "China" (not "the China") but it is "the People's Republic of China" (or "the PRC"). The US is just the exception where the country's regularly used name is also treated this way.

This situation makes for a big loss of costumers and visitors in the US.

"make for" or "makes for" can be used to mean "causes" or "results in" usually, people say "the" US, but I don't think this deserves too much concern

This situation makeshas led to a bsignificant loss of costumers and visitors in UCandian consumers of American goods and Canadian tourism in the U.S.

Fewer canadians visit it, and Europeans too.


Fewer cCanadians visit it, and Europeans too.

Fewer cCanadians visit it, and fewer Europeans too.

Fewer cCanadians visit it, and Europeans too.

Fewer cCanadians visit it, and Europeans too.visit the United States.

Unclear what you are talking about.

The United States, may lose around 90 billion dollars this year.


The United States, may lose around 90 billion dollars this year.

The United States, may lose around 90 billion dollars this year.

The pause after the topic here is very unnatural so I removed it.

The United States, may lose around 90 billion dollars this year.

the comma was unnecessary

TAs a result, the United States, may (is projected to) lose around 90 billion dollars this year.

I have a friend who are traveling to New york city the next week.


I have a friend who areis traveling to New yYork cCity the next week.

"is" because friend is singular. next week is not a noun so you don't need "the" in front of it.

I have a friend who areis traveling to New yYork cCity the next week.

"I have friends who are travelling" "I have a friend who is travelling" Watch out for verbs which also need to change when combined with plurals. "the next week" vs "next week" can be a little tricky. "the next week" refers to the week after some previously discussed time period. "next week" without the "the" refers to the week after the current week. Since you haven't mentioned a time period yet, "the next week" is wrong.

I have a friend who areis traveling to New yYork cCity the next week.

city names are always capitalized "are" corresponds to a plural subject (I have two friends who are traveling...) "is" corresponds to a singular subject (I have a/one friend who is traveling...)

I have a friend who areis traveling to New yYork cCity the next week.

Cities are always capitalized, conjugation error with "friend"

After his journey, i will ask he : "how much the life is expensive over there?"


After his journey, iI will ask heim : "how much thare life is expensiveving costs over there?"

After his journey, iI will ask he im: "hHow much the life is expensive is life over there?"

After his journey, iI will ask he :im, "hHow much the life is expensive is life over there?"

quotes or dialogue lines are usually introduced with a comma as in the correction "how much the life is expensive over there" could also be rephrased as "how much life costs over there"

After his journey, iI will ask he : "how much the life isim how expensive overlife there?" is.

I have been to New york city, i have travel over there 2 years ago.


I have been to New yYork cCity, i haveI travel overed there 2 years ago.

I have been to New yYork city, i have; I traveled over there 2 years ago.

"I have traveled over there" is fine, but note it has to be the past tense of the verb. However, native speakers would use the simpler expression with the simple past tense here.

I have been to New yYork cCity, i have; I travel overed there 2 years ago.

sometimes it is a good idea to separate independent clauses with a semicolon or a period

I have been to New yYork cCity, i have: I travel overed there 2two years ago.

I have make two big trips this year.


I have makde two big trips this year.

I have makde two big trips this year.

"made" is the past tense of "make"

I have makde two big trips this year.

made means in the past

I have makde two big trips this year.

My first trip was on north of vitenam, after that, on New york.


My first trip was onto the north of viteVietnam, after that, ton New yYork.

My first trip was onto the north of viteVietnam, after that, ton New yYork.

Note that when captialising names, every word within the name gets capitalised.

My first trip was onto the north of viteVietnam,; after that, I went ton New yYork.

or "to northern Vietnam"

My first trip was onto the north of vitenam,Vietnam, and after that, ton New yYork.

I liked New york, the history of immigration, the Brooklyn bridge whaaaaaaou.


I liked New yYork, the history of immigration, the Brooklyn bridge whaaaaaaou.

I liked New yYork, the history of immigration, the Brooklyn bridge whaaaaaaouoah.

I liked New yYork, the's history of immigration, and the Brooklyn bBridge whaaaaaaouooooooow.

your original sentence has three items: 1. New York 2. immigration history 3. Brooklyn Bridge Since numbers 2 and 3 belong to New York, the list does not have to be written the original way

I likedwas very impressed with New yYork, theespecially its history of immigration, and the Brooklyn bBridge! whaaaaaaou.

I have a lot memories.


I have a lot of memories.

I have a lot of memories.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

I have a lot of (wonderful, beautiful) memories.

But i did not like already the expensive life, so now, i can hate that.


But iI already did not like already the expensive life, so now, iI can hate that.

But iI already did not like already the expensive lifecost of living, so now, iI can hate that.

But iI did not like already the expensive life, so now, i canthe high cost of living; I hate that.

"cost of living" is a normal phrase when talking about how much money one needs to live somewhere "so now, I can hate that." sounds a bit unnatural, and the suggestion addresses that

But iHowever, I did not like already the expensive life, so now, i can hate that.style.

The vietnam, i love love love this country.


The vAs for Vietnam, iI love love love this country.

The vVietnam, iI love love love this country.

Going back to the previous example "Vietnam" is a proper noun so doesn't take a "the" (while "the Socialist Republic of Vietnam" would, if you spelled it out in full)

The vAbout Vietnam, iI love love love this country.

"about" helps introduce the new topic you could also try: Also, I love love love Vietnam.

The vietnam, i love love love this country.On the other hand, I absolutely loved Vietnam (combine with next sentence)

I hope can go again.


I hope I can go again.

I hope I can go again.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

I...and hope I can go agaireturn to visit soon.

Thank you reading.


Thank you for reading.

Thank you for reading.

Thank you for reading.

you could also try something like: I appreciate you reading this.

Thank you for reading.

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium