July 25, 2025
I come back to write in english about m'y readings.
I read a news about AI drone.
It a good news for the planete and nature.
Now, farmers can use the AI drones to stop weeds on their fields. They can spray only on wild plants and they does'not spray on a safe nature. It is a good idea to save nature and to discrease chemicals use.
Moreover, it more profitable than big agricultural's machines. These machines are very expansives.
It's a good for our future.
Thank you reading me.
Je reviens pour écrire en anglais au sujet de mes dernières lectures.
J'ai lu une nouvelle autour des drones IA.
C'est une bonne nouvelle pour la planète et la nature.
Maintenant les fermes, peuvent utiliser les drones IA pour enlever les mauvaises herbes dans leurs champs.
Ils peuvent pulvériser seulement sur les herbes sauvages, et non plus sur toute la nature.
C'est une bonne idée pour sauvegarder la nature saine et d'arrêter d'utiliser autant de chimiques.
En plus, cela est plus rentable que les grosses machines agricoles.
C'est bien pour notre futur.
I have come back here to write in eEnglish about m'y recent readings.
OPTION A: I read a news article about AI drones.¶
OPTION B: I read some news about AI drones.
It a good news for MY GUESS: That article wrote about how drones can be used in positive ways to monitor weather planete and natureatterns.
Now, farmers can use the AI drones to stopdetect weeds oin their fields.
MORE NATURALLY: They can then spray only on wildinvasive plants and they does'not spray on a safe naturecan avoid overusing herbicides.
It is a good idea to save nature and to discrease chemicalsWe should limit herbicide use.
My latest English readingWhat I have read recently in English.
I coame back to write in english about m'y readings.
I read a news about AI drones.
It aThose AI drones are good news for the planete and mother nature.
you can combine this sentence with the previous one
Now, fFarmers can now use the AI drones to stop weeds on their fields.
wow
They can spray only on wild plants and they does'non't spray on a safe nature.normal plants
It is a good idea to save nature and to discrease reduce the usage of chemicals use.
since you are talking about plants, u can also say pesticides, same shit
Moreover, it can be more profitable than big agricultural's machines.the big machines already used in agriculture today.
These machines are very expaensives.
expansive = covers a large era
It'These AI drones are good for our future.
be specific
Thank you reading me.
"reading me" = looking at someones body language, be careful
Feedback
good
I coame back to write in eEnglish about m'y readings.
I read a news about an AI drone.
It a's good news for the planete and nature.
Now, farmers can use the AI drones to stop weeds on their fields.
They can spray only on wild plants and they does' not spray on a safe nature.
It is a good idea to save nature and to disecrease chemicals use.
Moreover, it is more profitable than big agricultural's machines.
These machines are very expaensives.
It's a good for our future.
Thank you for reading me.
My latest English reading
I have come back to write in eEnglish about m'ywhat I have readings.
"My readings" might be grammatically correct but am'm not 100% sure, I apologize for my uncertainty. Nevertheless, "what I have read" is a more natural sentence.
I read a news article about an AI drone.
The word "news" is a mass noun meaning it is uncountable so you would have to use a definite (specific) article such as "the" in front of it instead of an indefinite (general) article like "a". So the sentence "I read the news about [an] AI drone." works, however it still has some unsaid implications in this context so it's not the most ideal way to word it.
Instead, you can keep the indefinite article "a" if you combine the uncountable noun "news" with a countable noun like "article." This option is the better choice since the news article you read is not explicitly stated; it is indefinite, hence the use of "a"
Since "AI drone" is not a proper noun, meaning it is not the official name of something it needs an article before it and because there is no specific"AI drone" mentioned (and it's safe to assume there's more than one in existence) it should be referred to with the indefinite article "an".
It is a good news forarticle about the planete and nature.
Now, farmers can use the AI drones to stop weeds from growing on their fields.
You have to specify what the weeds are doing on the farmers' fields.
They can spray only on wild plants and they does'do not spray on a safe nature.
This line is a bit hard to understand so I only fixed the spelling errors instead of grammatical errors too.
It is a good idea to save nature and to disecrease the use of chemicals use.
"It is a good idea to save nature and to decrease chemical usage." Also works.
Moreover, it is more profitable than big agricultural's machines.
An apostrophe and an s ('s) at the end of a noun to show ownership of an object. The original sentence with the 's could be grammatically correct if it were written like this: "Moreover, it [is] more profitable than Big Agricultural's machines." where Big Agricultural is the name of a person or an entity who is in possession of the aforementioned machines. However, in this context "big" and "agricultural" are adjectives meaning they are simply describing the machines, they are not nouns so they cannot claim ownership over something which would warrant the 's
Apostrophe s ('s) can also be used as a contraction, shorten "it is" into "it's".
These machines are very expaensives.
Expansive means big/large which you already mentioned in the previous sentence so saying this again would be redundant (repetitive) so I'm assuming you meant the word "expensive" meaning they cost a lot of money.
The 's' at the end of expansives takes the word from singular (one) to plural (multiple). Perhaps you did this because you're referring to multiple machines however in English, adjectives are typically never plural so there should not be an 's' at the end of expansive and/or expensive
It's a good for our future.
A is an article and articles are only necessary before (certain) nouns/noun phrases.
Thank you for reading me.
The word "for" is necessary to explain why you are saying thank you, it is a preposition which are used to show a relationship between objects, so in this context you would use "for" to connect "Thank you" with the reason why you are thankful: reading.
The word "me" is unnecessary because it is a personal pronoun meaning it refers to the speaker and in this case where the reader is being communicated to via an electronic blog post, it comes across as if the blog post is anthropomorphized (human-like) and is the one speaking to the reader and thanking them instead of you, the writer. You can get rid of the word me all together as "Thank you for reading" is a very common phrase.
Another way to word this sentence is, "Thank you for reading my post." In this case, the (personal) pronoun me has been substituted for the (possessive) pronoun my, both refer back to the speaker but "my" is used to when talking about something the speaker is in ownership or possession of, in this case your post.
Feedback
Great work! Sorry for the long responses haha.
My lLatest English rReading
In English, titles have certain rules about capitalization
I come'm back to write in eEnglish about m'y latest readings.
"...about my readings" sounds like it is missing something ; adding "latest" helps.
Alternative: "...about what I've read lately."
I read a news article about AI drones.
It a's good news for the planete and nature.
"News" alone isn't countable.
Now, farmers can use the AI drones to stop weeds from growing on their fields.
They can spray only on wild plants and they does'not spray on a safe natureeeds without having to spray over the entire crop.
This is a better translation based on your original text
It is a good idea to savetay natureal and to disecrease chemicals use.
Moreover, it is more profitable than using big agricultural's machines equipment.
Equipment is a bit more natural here. Machines by default are envisioned as being immobile.
These machines areis equipment is very expaensives.
"Expensive" will never take an S
It'These drones are good for our future.
It's good to return to the subject (drones) to be clear what we are referring to
Thank you reading mey post.
Feedback
Bien écrit !
They can spray only on wild plants and they does'not spray on a safe nature. They can spray only on w This is a better translation based on your original text They can spray only on wild plants and This line is a bit hard to understand so I only fixed the spelling errors instead of grammatical errors too. They can spray only on wild plants and they do They can spray only on wild plants and they do MORE NATURALLY: They can then spray only on |
It is a good idea to save nature and to discrease chemicals use. It is a good idea to s It is a good idea to save nature and to d "It is a good idea to save nature and to decrease chemical usage." Also works. It is a good idea to save nature and to d It is a good idea to save nature and to since you are talking about plants, u can also say pesticides, same shit
|
Moreover, it more profitable than big agricultural's machines. Moreover, it is more profitable than using big agricultural Equipment is a bit more natural here. Machines by default are envisioned as being immobile. Moreover, it is more profitable than big agricultural An apostrophe and an s ('s) at the end of a noun to show ownership of an object. The original sentence with the 's could be grammatically correct if it were written like this: "Moreover, it [is] more profitable than Big Agricultural's machines." where Big Agricultural is the name of a person or an entity who is in possession of the aforementioned machines. However, in this context "big" and "agricultural" are adjectives meaning they are simply describing the machines, they are not nouns so they cannot claim ownership over something which would warrant the 's Apostrophe s ('s) can also be used as a contraction, shorten "it is" into "it's". Moreover, it is more profitable than big agricultural's machines. Moreover, it can be more profitable than |
These machines are very expansives. Th "Expensive" will never take an S These machines are very exp Expansive means big/large which you already mentioned in the previous sentence so saying this again would be redundant (repetitive) so I'm assuming you meant the word "expensive" meaning they cost a lot of money. The 's' at the end of expansives takes the word from singular (one) to plural (multiple). Perhaps you did this because you're referring to multiple machines however in English, adjectives are typically never plural so there should not be an 's' at the end of expansive and/or expensive These machines are very exp These machines are very exp expansive = covers a large era |
It's a good for our future.
It's good to return to the subject (drones) to be clear what we are referring to It's A is an article and articles are only necessary before (certain) nouns/noun phrases. It's
be specific |
Thank you reading me. Thank you reading m Thank you for reading The word "for" is necessary to explain why you are saying thank you, it is a preposition which are used to show a relationship between objects, so in this context you would use "for" to connect "Thank you" with the reason why you are thankful: reading. The word "me" is unnecessary because it is a personal pronoun meaning it refers to the speaker and in this case where the reader is being communicated to via an electronic blog post, it comes across as if the blog post is anthropomorphized (human-like) and is the one speaking to the reader and thanking them instead of you, the writer. You can get rid of the word me all together as "Thank you for reading" is a very common phrase. Another way to word this sentence is, "Thank you for reading my post." In this case, the (personal) pronoun me has been substituted for the (possessive) pronoun my, both refer back to the speaker but "my" is used to when talking about something the speaker is in ownership or possession of, in this case your post. Thank you for reading me. Thank you reading "reading me" = looking at someones body language, be careful |
My latest English reading My In English, titles have certain rules about capitalization This sentence has been marked as perfect!
|
I come back to write in english about m'y readings. I "...about my readings" sounds like it is missing something ; adding "latest" helps. Alternative: "...about what I've read lately." I have come back to write in "My readings" might be grammatically correct but am'm not 100% sure, I apologize for my uncertainty. Nevertheless, "what I have read" is a more natural sentence. I c I c I have come back here to write in |
I read a news about AI drone. I read a news article about AI drones. I read a news article about an AI drone. The word "news" is a mass noun meaning it is uncountable so you would have to use a definite (specific) article such as "the" in front of it instead of an indefinite (general) article like "a". So the sentence "I read the news about [an] AI drone." works, however it still has some unsaid implications in this context so it's not the most ideal way to word it. Instead, you can keep the indefinite article "a" if you combine the uncountable noun "news" with a countable noun like "article." This option is the better choice since the news article you read is not explicitly stated; it is indefinite, hence the use of "a" Since "AI drone" is not a proper noun, meaning it is not the official name of something it needs an article before it and because there is no specific"AI drone" mentioned (and it's safe to assume there's more than one in existence) it should be referred to with the indefinite article "an". I read a news about an AI drone. I read OPTION A: I read a news article about AI drones.¶ |
It a good news for the planete and nature. It "News" alone isn't countable. It is a good news It
you can combine this sentence with the previous one
|
Now, farmers can use the AI drones to stop weeds on their fields. Now, farmers can use Now, farmers can use the AI drones to stop weeds from growing on their fields. You have to specify what the weeds are doing on the farmers' fields. This sentence has been marked as perfect!
wow Now, farmers can use the AI drones to |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium