The movie "Arrival" is one of my favorites movies, because this historye storytelling is not linear, the plot is not obvious, the aliens ' appearance are notis also not obvious too, and the cinematography is phenomenal in my opinion.

History would be looking backwards from the start of the film, but I think you're talking about events that happen in the film so I think "storytelling" would be better here.

You use singular appearance, which makes me think the aliens all look similar, and since it's singular you use "appearance is". If the aliens all look different, you could also say "the aliens' appearances are"

The movie "Arrival" is one of my favorites movies, because thits history is not linear, the plot is not obvious, the aliens appearance are not not obvious too, and the cinematography is phenomenal in my opinion.

My fFavorite mMovie

Titles are usually capitalized in English.

The movie "Arrival" is one of my favorites movies, because this hie story is not linear, the plot is not obvious, the aliens appearance are not not obvious too, and the cinematography is phenomenal in my opinion.

The movie "Arrival" is one of my favorites movies, because this hie story is not linear, the plot is not obvious, the aliens ' appearance are notis also not obvious too, and the cinematography is phenomenal in my opinion.

are > is because "appearance" is a singular noun, even though you're referring to the appearance of many aliens.

"History" is not a word used to describe a movie. You could talk instead about the movie's story, narrative, or plot. There may be slight differences in those words, but they are basically the same thing. All three would be acceptable here.

Maybe instead of "not obvious", you could say "creative" or "inventive" or "non-traditional."