"Teenagers" by My cChemical rRomance "Teenagers"

Some days ago, I was listening the song "Teenagers" by the band My cChemical rRomance, t. This song is from 2006, so we can say that is outdatet is an old song, but it is interesting how the song made forecast about thepredicted different issues that actual times families have.

The sSociety is no longer surprised by the difficulty to have a family is, in our actual daysies families face, because we' are jammed full of problems in our everyday lives.

Sorry, I'm not sure if this is what you were trying to get at.

A lot of times the, politics and NGO triedy to figured out what the impediments are, and take away any seed (Oor spark) that could start the problems in thea family.

However, few things have achieved the jumped off and made a reallny good mark, until this daysprogress so far (in my opinion). How did the familyies becomes what It'like this?

Why are the family areies so wobbly?

What (or Wwho) robsets the aim tbar on what a family must toshould be?

My cChemical rRomance’s "Teenagers"

Since “My Chemical Romance” is the name of the band, you should capitalise it.
The song also belongs to the band, so you should have ‘s at the end.
Alternatively, you could also say something like:
“Teenagers” by My Chemical Romance.

SomeA few days ago I was listening to the song "Teenagers" by the band My cChemical rRomance, t. This song is from 2006, so we can say that ist is an outdated song, but it is interesting how the song made forecasta prediction about the different issues that actual times familiesfamilies actually have.

When talking about specific time periods (e.g. seconds, minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, years, decades, etc.) you would use “a few” instead of “some”. However you could say “some time ago”, which would give a very general indication of time having passed, but not specific enough to have an actual idea of exactly how much time has passed.

It would be a better idea to start a new sentence to avoid it getting to long, but a more natural way to connect the two ideas together in one sentence would be to say “which is a song from 2006”. However I would avoid making it any longer than that.

You would need to add in “it”, which would act as the subject. You could also just leave it and let “that” act as the subject instead of as a way of indicating what we could say, but personally I don’t really like how that sounds.
Regardless of what you do there, since “song” is a noun, you would need to use an article, which in this case is “an”. If you didn’t want to use “an”, you could also just remove “song” so it becomes “so we can say that it is outdated”.

With the second part, you would definitely need to use “it” as the subject.

“Forecast” is used more often with weather, so “prediction” would be the better choice here. In both cases, they are a noun, so you would need to use “a”. If you wanted to avoid that, you could also put the noun in its verb form, so it would become “but it is interesting how the song predicted the different issues that families actually have”.

I’m not 100% certain about what you meant with “actual times”. If you want to say that families really do have those problems, you could use my suggestion.
Instead, if you wanted to emphasise the “time” part of “actual times”, you could say “the different issues that families often have”. This would say that the problems are very common in families, and happen a lot.

The sSociety is no longer surprise thed by how difficulty to haveing a family is, in our actual days we're jammed ofand nowadays we have many problems.

You would never really use “the” in front of “society”. Typically you would either have nothing in front, as I have done in my suggestion, or you could also say “our society”. I think that here it sounds better to just say “society” though.

“Surprise” is a verb, but it would be saying that the subject is doing the surprising (so here it would kind of be saying that society no longer surprises/shocks the difficulty of having a family, which is not right here).
Here, it would be better to say that society is no longer surprised by something. So you could either use my suggestion, or you could also say “society is no longer surprised by the difficulty of having a family”, or something like that.

In English you would never really say “actual times”, “actual days” or anything like that.
I’m not really sure exactly what you meant by the last part of the sentence, but I think my suggestion could work. You could also replace “we have” with “there are” or “we face”.

A lot of times the pPoliticians and NGOs have often tried to figured out the impediments and take away any seed (Or spark) that start theremove anything that starts/triggers/sparks problems in thea family.

I think “a lot of times” would sound better at the end of the sentence, but I just decided to replace it with “often” instead.

“Politics” refers more so to the topic, while “politicians” are the actual people who are involved in politics.

You don’t need to use “have” (it depends more on the exact context). “Have” makes it sound a bit more like they’re still trying to deal with this issue, whereas without it it sounds more like you’re talking about something that no longer happens (basically something a while back in the past).

I’m not entirely sure how the grammar works, but since you already have “tried” in the past tense, you don’t need anything else to be in the past tense unless it is completely unrelated (as in if they didn’t try to do something, then that something should be in past tense). That’s sounding a bit confusing to me but I hope you get the idea.

I think my suggestion makes the second part sound a bit more natural.

But some feedback on what you originally had:
“Root” would probably be a better choice than seed (so you would say something along the lines of “take away the root of any problems in the family”).
I like your idea of using “spark”, but it feels unnatural in that particular case, which is why I included it as a possible word choice in my suggestion.
“Any seed” and “any spark” are both singular nouns, so you would say “starts” instead of “start”.
Otherwise to keep it as “start”, you could say “any seeds” or “any sparks”.
“The problems” sounds very specific, as if you’re talking about some specific problems which you have discussed in your text, but you haven’t really done that so I wouldn’t use “the”.
Likewise, “the family” feels like you’re referencing a specific family. “A family” is more general, or you could add another word after family to become something like “the family structure”, which would also sound a bit more general, albeit a little weird.

However, few things have achieve the jumped off and made a really goodreally achieved anything and made a mark, until this odays (in my opinion). How did the family becomes what It'it is?

The first few bits are just to make it sound more natural.
I don’t really feel like “really good” is necessary, since “achieved” kind of implies that you’re talking about change for the better (or for good).

Since “days” is plural, you would say “these days”, but that sounds a little weird since it’s at the end of a sentence. Instead you would say “today”, which in this case doesn’t necessarily mean this specific day, but instead sometime around now. You could also say “now” instead of “today”.

To take “in my opinion” out of the brackets you could also say “however, in my opinion, few things have really achieved anything and made a mark until now”.

For the final question, you could say “how did family become what it is” or “how did families become what they are”. “Family” feels more like you’re talking about the concept of family, and “families” feel like you’re talking about the actual families themselves, but their meanings are really similar so I’d say they’re pretty interchangeable.

Even though as a statement, you would say “family becomes”, when it’s in a question “becomes” drops the s (which I’m realising I never realised until now so I have no idea why).
You would use “it’s” or “they’re” at the beginning of a sentence, or at least just not at the end of a sentence or question. At the end, you would expand it to “it is” or “they are”.

Why thare family are so wobies so unstable?¶
OR¶
Why is family so unstablye?

With “the family” you would still use “is” instead of “are”.
You have to kind of switch the verb and subject around when you add a word like “why” to form a question.
A word like “unstable” is a bit better of a choice than “wobbly”.

What (or Who) rob the aim that a family must too or what prevents a family from being what it should be?

I’m not entirely sure what you meant but I think this could work?
You can take “or who” out of the brackets, and typically you would say “who” before “what”.

My chemical romance's "Teenagers"

SomeA few days ago I was listening the song "Teenagers" by the band My chemical romance, this song is from 2006, so we can say that is outdated song, but it is interesting how the song made forecasta prediction about the different issues that actual timesand very real issues faced by families have.

The sSociety no longer surprise the difficulty toaccepts that haveing a family is, in our actual days we're jammed of problems difficult, and we're faced with problems everyday.

A lot of times the pMay times, Politicians and NGOs tried to figured out the impediments and take away any seed (Or spark) that start thried to reduce any of the causes that could cause problems in thea family.

However, only a few things have been achieve the jumped offd and made a really good mark, u. Until this days (in my opinion) Hnow how did the familyies becomes what It'sthey are?

Why thare familyies are so wobblyfragile?

What (or Who) rob the aim that a family must to be?

Who/What is preventing families from being what they should be?