Nov. 17, 2020
I read in my student book a texte about the "Debrett's guide to mobile phone etiquette" and one of the advices is particularly good in my point of view: when we talk in your office with somebody and that suddenly anyaone ring you on your phone, please, don't answer, keep talking with your colleague. Of course, you can shorten the first conversation, apologize . The personne who tries to join you don't deserve any kind of priority unless, unfortunetly if you are a fireman.
Another advice is to respect the quiet zones on the train, plane, bus... By my little experience, i can say that the people respect these areas when they are on train for a long trip , probably becauseon train we can find good identified quiet zones but on bus, tramway and on short distances, there are always, or more exactly very often some people who call , speak on or sometimes, the worst, shout on their phones. Are these bus'es phone travellers all deaf ?
suddenly anyone ring...
because on train...
speak or sometimes...
mobile phone etiquette
I read in my student book a texte about the "Debrett's gGuide to mMobile pPhone eEtiquette" and onthere is one piece of the advices that is particularly good infrom my point of view: when wyou are talking in your office with somebody and thaten suddenly anyasomeone rings you on your phone, please, don't answer, keep talking with your colleague.
Title case: https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/capitalization/title-case
I personally would use “call” instead of “ring” but I left it since I think it is common in the UK.
Of course, you can shorten the first conversation, and apologize .
The personne who tries to jointerrupt you don'esn’t deserve any kind of priority unless, unfortunetly ifately, you are a fireman.
Another piece of advice is to respect the quiet zones on the train, plane, bus... Byand bus. From my little experience, iI can say that the people respect these areas when they are on the train for a long trip , probably because on the train we can find good well identified quiet zones, but on the bus, tramway and onfor short distances, there are always, or more exactly very often, some people who call , speak on , or sometimes, theeven worste, shout on their phones.
“there are always, or more exactly very often, some people who“ this sentence feels awkward to me. I would just write “there are often people who“ to keep it concise
Edited the last part of the sentence to eliminate redundancy
Are these bus'es’ phone travellers all deaf ?
Feedback
Good job! I definitely agree with you about loud people on public transportation... that last line made me laugh. If I had to make one comment it would be to watch your run-on sentences and interjected (comma isolated) phrases. Keep on writing!
|
mobile phone etiquette This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
I read in my student book a texte about the "Debrett's guide to mobile phone etiquette" and one of the advices is particularly good in my point of view: when we talk in your office with somebody and that suddenly anyaone ring you on your phone, please, don't answer, keep talking with your colleague. I read in my student book a text Title case: https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/capitalization/title-case I personally would use “call” instead of “ring” but I left it since I think it is common in the UK. |
|
Of course, you can shorten the first conversation, apologize . Of course, you can shorten the first conversation |
|
The personne who tries to join you don't deserve any kind of priority unless, unfortunetly if you are a fireman. The person |
|
Another advice is to respect the quiet zones on the train, plane, bus... By my little experience, i can say that the people respect these areas when they are on train for a long trip , probably becauseon train we can find good identified quiet zones but on bus, tramway and on short distances, there are always, or more exactly very often some people who call , speak on or sometimes, the worst, shout on their phones. Another piece of advice is to respect the quiet zones on the train, plane, “there are always, or more exactly very often, some people who“ this sentence feels awkward to me. I would just write “there are often people who“ to keep it concise Edited the last part of the sentence to eliminate redundancy |
|
Are these bus'es phone travellers all deaf ? Are these bus |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium