Mercy- killing and Right-to-die

It'This is the first time I've written such a long article.

DOver the decades we have witnessed advances in medical knowledge and technological means that has brought unprecedented opportunities for humanity.

Nice choice of words, you clearly have an advanced vocabulary.

Medicinal science has made huge strides in extending human life, examples include: advanced life support technology( such as defibrillation and ECMO), kidney dialysis, intravenous/enteral nutrition, and organ transplant and so ons.

So in the final stages of disease progression, euthanasia is the most desired option for the mostany of them.

I changed "most" to "many", because if you are going to use "most", I'd expect to see evidence/proof of that claim, while for "many", I do not expect that same level of proof.

Patients always make the decision to euthanize after weighing their own quality of life and financial ability and that should be respected, because when a meaningful life is no longer possible, the burden on histheir familyies will only be heavier.

Changed "his" to "their" to make the pronoun agree with "patients".

Moreover, euthanasia allows patients to maintain a natural and intact state of life until the end of life, thus they can spend the last time of life with peace of mind and maintain their own dignity.

It is doctors'Doctors have a duty to save lives and heal the wounded, but it is not the only duty as-- relieving the suffering of patients is also significant.

For a terminally ill and extremely distressed patient, it is more humane to relieve his suffering, rather than take futile methods to increasprolong the excruciation.

Mercy-k Killing and Right- to-d Die

It'This is the first time I've written such a long article.

I know there must be lots of mistakes, so please correct me.

Mercy-k Killing and Right- to-d Die

During the COVID-19 epidemic, a Japanese doctor revealed that a hospital in the United States had euthanized a patient who was infected severely withseverely infected, had no hope of survival, and couldn’t afford the medical care, which has sparked heated discussion all over the world.

Decades have witnessed advances in medical knowledge and technological means, and that has brought unprecedented opportunities for humanity.

Medicine has made huge strides in extending human life: advanced life support technology (such as defibrillation and ECMO), kidney dialysis, intravenous/enteral nutrition, organ transplants, and so on.

Although advanced medical technologies can delay death, many endlate-stage patients know in their hearts that death is still unavoidable.

Furthermore, they may have to spend more resources and suffer more during the process of delaying death.

So in the final stages of a disease's progression, euthanasia is the most desired option for the most of them.

Patients always make the decision to euthanize after weightaking their own quality of life and financial ability into consideration, and that should be respected, because when a meaningful life is no longer possible, the burden on histheir family will only become heavier.

Moreover, euthanasia allows patients to maintain a natural and intact state of life until the end of life,, and thus, they can spend their last time of life with peace of mind andmoments in peace while maintaining their own dignity.

It is a doctors's duty to save lives and heal the wounded, but ithat is not their only duty, as relieving the suffering of patients is also a significant aspect.

For a terminally ill and extremely distressed patient, it is more humane to relieve histheir suffering, rather than tmake futile methods toefforts that increase their excruciation.

If various measures arehave been taken andbut there is only more pain on the road to death, they are far fromn that's no longer the purpose of medicine.

And to some extent, it reflects the pursuit of humanitarianism, which can be seen as a meanifestation of the progress of social civilization.

In addition, from the perspective of social benefits, stopping ineffective medical treatment is helpful for the rational use of medical and health-related resources.

People should bravely challenge their disease, instead of ending their lives prematurely, because great emotional damage will fall on their families and friendtheir families and friends will have to shoulder great emotional pains if they take off all the heavsy burdensway out through euthanasia.

Next, nowadays medicalmedical technology is developing so rapidly nowadays that some currently untreatable diseases may be conquered by the medical community within a year or two.

Then, it would be a great regretshame for the patients if theythat choose to die prematurely.

It would be a great opportunity for them to escape criminal responsibility if both society and the law supported euthanasia, because it’s unaimpossible to determine whether thea patient actually choose to be euthanized byof themselvesir own will.

In addition, it cannot be ignored that some patients request euthanasia because they consider themselves a burden to their family, especially in rural areas where medical insurance has not yet been fully implemented yet.

People feel that death is the best way to solve the problem once they get a serious disease, and they are actually killed by poverty, which is a very inhumane social phenomenon.

Let’s take the Netherlands foras an example.

Since euthanasia was legalized in this country, the number of people who died through euthanasia has risen year by year, and the standard of euthanasia has been constantly beingafter year while the bar for it has continuously lowered, which suggestsing that the evolution of euthanasia is spiraling out of control.

But no matter whether weyou support euthanasia or not, we should put the interests of the patient first, respect the patient's autonomy, and leave the decision to the patient and histheir family of whether to give up medical supporting.