asfero's avatar
asfero

Oct. 4, 2024

0
Lovely readers

It is absolutelly my cup of tea reading the books. I trully believe that books share wisdom with audience. And we can find out answers for all questions there. Especially if someone need protection agains destructive thougths. And I love people who reading a lot. They are a greatfull opponents.

Corrections

Lovely rReaders

It i love to read books. It’s absolutelly my cup of tea reading the books.!

“ my cup of tea” is usually said at the end of a sentence.

I trully believe that books share wisdom with audiencethe readers.

And we can find out answers for all our questions there.

Especially if someone need protection against destructive thougthts.

And I love people who reading a lot.

They are a greatefull opponents.

Lovely readers

ItReading books is absolutelly my cup of tea reading the books.

You wouldn’t use a definite article (the) after certain verbs (for example you would say “reading books”, “watching movies”, “playing games”, “writing stories” or “listening to music/podcasts/audiobooks”, and it wouldn’t make sense in any of them to have “the” before the objects (“books”, “movies”, “games”, “stories” or “music/podcasts/audiobooks)). But this might also just be because the verbs have “-ing” as a suffix, since it would be ok to use “the” afterwards in all of those examples, given that the verbs didn’t end in “ing”.
I’m sorry I can’t provide an actual explanation on why that’s the case though.

With the original sentence, it would be better to have a comma after “tea”, but that would still sound very unnatural. “It” should only really be used as the subject if it’s already clear what “it” is referring to. If you need to clarify what “it” means, like what you’ve done here, it would be better to just replace “it” with what it refers to (so in this case I replaced it with “reading books”).

I trully believe that books share wisdom with the audience.

The only case where you wouldn’t have an article before “audience” is if it was plural (audiences).

And wWe can also find out answers for all questions thereevery question in books, (which is) especially (useful) when someone is dealing with destructive thoughts.

It’s better to try to avoid starting a sentence with “and” if possible. An easy way to do this is to either join two sentences together using “and”, or keeping them as separate sentences but using a word like “also” or “as well” (as well goes at the end of a sentence). instead of “and”.

I think “find out” is more for if the next word isn’t a noun (e.g. “find out if someone has to do something” or “find out that books are better than movies”). Those examples were really bad, but you can kind of get the idea from them.

Since “answers” is a noun, then you don’t need “out”. But you could say “we can also find out what the answer is for every question in books”, which is really long but is grammatically correct.

You would need to say something like “all (of) our questions” or “all kinds of questions” for it to make more sense. I just decided to change it to “every question” instead.

I think “there” would be more ok if the previous sentence had talked about something in books. You could say “in them” as well if you wanted to be more general.

Another way to word the sentence would be “books allow us to find answers for every question”.


You can choose if you add “which is… useful” depending on your intended meaning.
Without: You can mainly find answers for questions in books when the questions are about destructive thoughts.
With: You can find answers from books at any time, but it is especially useful when the ‘questions ’ revolve around destructive thoughts.

Especially if someone need protection agains destructive thougths.

It doesn’t really sound the best to start a sentence with “especially” so I joined it to the last sentence. I made it sound a little more natural as well.

And II also love people who reading a lot, as they are great friends/companions.

You would need to say “who are reading a lot”, but that’s talking about a very specific moment happening right now (so people who are reading at this point in time).
“Who read” is much more general, and would be the better choice here.

“Companions” for if you’re thinking more just people who relax and talk a little, but aren’t close to
“Friends” would be for if you’re close to them.

They are a greatfull opponents.

“A” and “an” only go in front of singular nouns (so not “opponentS”).

I linked this one with the previous sentence since they were both so short.

The closest word to “greatfull” would “be grateful”, which would be saying that people who read are very appreciative.

“Opponents” is used when you’re on a different side to someone (so an opponent is someone who you are on the opposite side of), which doesn’t make sense when you say that you like people who read.

Feedback

Good job! I love books as well!

asfero's avatar
asfero

Oct. 5, 2024

0

Thank you so much. I really like analize your comments!

Lovely rReaders

It is absolutelly my cup of tea reading the booksReading books is my cup of tea.

I trully believe that books share wisdom with audiences.

And wWe can find out answers for all our questions therein books.

Especially if someoneBooks are especially helpful for people who need protection against destructive thougthts.

And II also love people who reading a lot.

They are a greatfull opponents.

It is absolutelly my cup of tea reading the booksReading books is my cup of tea.

I trully believe that books share wisdom with their readers/audience.

And wWe can find outdiscover answers for all kinds of questions there, especially if we are trying to overcome negative thought patterns.

Especially if someone need protection agains destructive thougths.

And I love people who reading a lot.

They are a greatfull opponents.mazing to be around.

Unless you're specifically talking about how book lovers are great for debates, I would elaborate more why you like book lovers.

Lovely readers


Lovely rReaders

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Lovely rReaders

It is absolutelly my cup of tea reading the books.


It is absolutelly my cup of tea reading the booksReading books is my cup of tea.

It is absolutelly my cup of tea reading the booksReading books is my cup of tea.

ItReading books is absolutelly my cup of tea reading the books.

You wouldn’t use a definite article (the) after certain verbs (for example you would say “reading books”, “watching movies”, “playing games”, “writing stories” or “listening to music/podcasts/audiobooks”, and it wouldn’t make sense in any of them to have “the” before the objects (“books”, “movies”, “games”, “stories” or “music/podcasts/audiobooks)). But this might also just be because the verbs have “-ing” as a suffix, since it would be ok to use “the” afterwards in all of those examples, given that the verbs didn’t end in “ing”. I’m sorry I can’t provide an actual explanation on why that’s the case though. With the original sentence, it would be better to have a comma after “tea”, but that would still sound very unnatural. “It” should only really be used as the subject if it’s already clear what “it” is referring to. If you need to clarify what “it” means, like what you’ve done here, it would be better to just replace “it” with what it refers to (so in this case I replaced it with “reading books”).

It i love to read books. It’s absolutelly my cup of tea reading the books.!

“ my cup of tea” is usually said at the end of a sentence.

I trully believe that books share wisdom with audience.


I trully believe that books share wisdom with their readers/audience.

I trully believe that books share wisdom with audiences.

I trully believe that books share wisdom with the audience.

The only case where you wouldn’t have an article before “audience” is if it was plural (audiences).

I trully believe that books share wisdom with audiencethe readers.

And we can find out answers for all questions there.


And wWe can find outdiscover answers for all kinds of questions there, especially if we are trying to overcome negative thought patterns.

And wWe can find out answers for all our questions therein books.

And wWe can also find out answers for all questions thereevery question in books, (which is) especially (useful) when someone is dealing with destructive thoughts.

It’s better to try to avoid starting a sentence with “and” if possible. An easy way to do this is to either join two sentences together using “and”, or keeping them as separate sentences but using a word like “also” or “as well” (as well goes at the end of a sentence). instead of “and”. I think “find out” is more for if the next word isn’t a noun (e.g. “find out if someone has to do something” or “find out that books are better than movies”). Those examples were really bad, but you can kind of get the idea from them. Since “answers” is a noun, then you don’t need “out”. But you could say “we can also find out what the answer is for every question in books”, which is really long but is grammatically correct. You would need to say something like “all (of) our questions” or “all kinds of questions” for it to make more sense. I just decided to change it to “every question” instead. I think “there” would be more ok if the previous sentence had talked about something in books. You could say “in them” as well if you wanted to be more general. Another way to word the sentence would be “books allow us to find answers for every question”. You can choose if you add “which is… useful” depending on your intended meaning. Without: You can mainly find answers for questions in books when the questions are about destructive thoughts. With: You can find answers from books at any time, but it is especially useful when the ‘questions ’ revolve around destructive thoughts.

And we can find out answers for all our questions there.

And I love people who reading a lot.


And I love people who reading a lot.

And II also love people who reading a lot.

And II also love people who reading a lot, as they are great friends/companions.

You would need to say “who are reading a lot”, but that’s talking about a very specific moment happening right now (so people who are reading at this point in time). “Who read” is much more general, and would be the better choice here. “Companions” for if you’re thinking more just people who relax and talk a little, but aren’t close to “Friends” would be for if you’re close to them.

And I love people who reading a lot.

Especially if someone need protection agains destructive thougths.


Especially if someone need protection agains destructive thougths.

Especially if someoneBooks are especially helpful for people who need protection against destructive thougthts.

Especially if someone need protection agains destructive thougths.

It doesn’t really sound the best to start a sentence with “especially” so I joined it to the last sentence. I made it sound a little more natural as well.

Especially if someone need protection against destructive thougthts.

They are a greatfull opponents.


They are a greatfull opponents.mazing to be around.

Unless you're specifically talking about how book lovers are great for debates, I would elaborate more why you like book lovers.

They are a greatfull opponents.

They are a greatfull opponents.

“A” and “an” only go in front of singular nouns (so not “opponentS”). I linked this one with the previous sentence since they were both so short. The closest word to “greatfull” would “be grateful”, which would be saying that people who read are very appreciative. “Opponents” is used when you’re on a different side to someone (so an opponent is someone who you are on the opposite side of), which doesn’t make sense when you say that you like people who read.

They are a greatefull opponents.

They are greatfull opponents.


You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium