For the context, I'd like to mention that this year I've successfully passed all exams and from thethis year. This autumn, I'll be studying international relations in the Czech Republic.

Good luck with your studies in the Czech Republic.

I'm Ukrainian, and I wouldn't say that international relations have been attracting me all my life, but. However, I think the invasion and other unexpected happening(current) events have changed my view on the foreign policy.

So year beforeConsequently, I started to read as much as possible literaturelots of literary works, articles, and news about what's happening in the globalized world, behind and in front ofworld and Ukraine.

I've read some signprolificant books, which by authors that I regard as one of the best political analysts and writers (I mean, such as Kissinger and Brzezinski,. Idk'm unsure if his Polish is spelled correctly.

if his polish surname is written correctly).

I combined this sentence fragment with the previous sentence.

But also aA year before, I found a really difficult book to read by Huntinghton,n arduous book to read by Samuel Huntington, “Clash of Civilizations”, which is based on his own theory of international relations, ''Clash of Civilizations''.

I won't take up your time by explaining the detailedkey aspects he included in his theory, but I will try to summoarize his work in a few words.

The main subject he maintained consists inH discussed remaking of the world order, after the collapse of the USSR, when the bipolarized world ceased to exist.

The America was left alone in a world with no enemies,. China was far long from its nowadays dominant position,. Russia was left weakened and ashamed, but cured and abolished from the "“red illness"”.

After this constant world order, there came out thea new one, based not on ideologies, but nations as the major influence in foreign affairs.

Huntington saytates that the nations and cultures will play maina key role in the modern world, but at the same time he consciously omits all unions, all organizations, that. These are based not on the nationality, but on state's own reasons and ambitions.

Since you're writing in a formal register, I recommend using a word other than says. I've used the word, states, but you can find synonyms of say on Google.

This made this book weird for me, but t. The worst part of the book was exactly aboutin my opinion was when he discussed Russo-Ukrainian relations.

I understand, that the book came out in 1994, in the period, when no one could even think about possibility of war between "s“Slavic bBrothers", but s”. Still, the quaotation like ¶
", “I don't believe in Russo-Ukrainian conflict because they are both partrs of the Orthodox civilizations" still remains weird for me, even” is strange to me, despite the year the book was firstly published.