Le salaire oùu le bonheur

Personellement, je voudrais un travail avec moins de salaire quemais où je profite plus.

Maintenant, je travaille dans une grande entreprise.

Le salaire est bon, mais je deéteste le type de travailce que je fais.

Il n'y a pas unde balance entre le travail et mon temps libre.

C'est aussi très stressant, est souvent, le travail me laisse anxieuse.

"et" est un connecteur tandis que "est" est le verbe "être" conjugué au présent

J'avais eu beaucoup des travails quei n'étaient pas corporatives.

J'ai gagné moins de salaire'argent, mais j'ai plus profité d'aller aue mon travail.

Par exaemple, j'ai travaillé au camp d'été pour des enfants.

On escaladait des montagnes, on a fait de kayaking, on a fait une randonnée et on a passé tout de notres temps enau plein air.

C'était a fait le salaire minimumJe gagnais moins d'argent, mais j'ai adoré ce travail.

Quel est votre opinion'en pensez vous ?

Je pense que c'est préférable de gagner quand même un bon salaire mais il faut privilégier un travail qui nous rende heureux.

Le salaire oùu le bonheur

With an "ù", où is used for location. (Où es-tu? = Where are you?).
When used as part of an OR logical statement, no accent.

Je pense que ça deépend, c'est spécifique pour chaque personne.

It's a bit of an anglicism to use spécifique this way, but perfectly understandable.

Personellement, je voudpréférerais un travail avec un moins dre salaire quemais dont je profite.

Your comparative construction is slightly lacking punch. Where "Rather" has an automatic discerning quality in English, the French conditional is not as opinionated, especially voudrais. While "Vouloir" translates to "Want/Desire", and "Je voudrais" is like "I would like", its use in polite phrasing is close to would's "Would you hold the door for me please?", but without the rather.

It is closer to "If it's alright (with the person spoken to, and in general), then I would like a job with less pay and more satisfaction." in connotation than the affirmative "I would like this."

You can address this by using a verb with an inherent opinion like préférer, and you can complete your second proposition with a conjunction like Mais (by opposition with...)

Maintenant, je travaille dans une grande entreprise.

Although the noun is Travail, the verb is Travailler.

Le salaire est bon, mais je deéteste le type de travail que je fais.

Il n'y a pas un balancd'équilibre entre le travail et mon temps libre.

"Balance" is feminine, so it would be "Une balance", but it is a false friend and means a scale.

J'avaisi eu beaucoup des travail'emplois quei n'étaient pas corporativese.

"Travail" is subject to a bit of an odd rule, which is that its plural, travaux, is not allowed for the sense of one's employment. It exists, but exclusively for series of tasks, (Road work = Travaux), or the expression "Travaux forcés" (Hard labor).
So when you need the plural, you need its synonyms, emplois, or boulots (in a less formal register).

"J'avais eu" would express the Plus que Parfait, which is the past within the past.
This is where tense consistency comes into play: Because your text is written in present tense, its past is simply the past, not the past-past of the Plus que parfait. Because "I was employed/I had jobs which..." is not a punctual event (I sawed the plank), it is not passé simple.

J'aie gagnéais moins de salaire'argent, mais j'ai profité d'aller au travmais ce que je faisails.

Aïe, la distinction entre l'imparfait et le passé composé. The short version is that passé composé is closer to English's simple past: something that took place and ended, and l'Imparfait is closer to "Used to [Verb]" constructions, but you should get a second opinion.

So for actions which used to be habit, the imparfait is used. Passé composé is for actions which took place and ended in the past.

But, you say, my past jobs took place and ended in the past, correct? Yes, but apparently, the habitual nature of it (it went on for a substantial amount of time) takes precedence.

This is more something mastered with intuitive comprehension over time.

Par example, j'ai travaillé au camp d'étéété animatrice dans une colonie de vacances pour des enfants.

It is odd to say "Pour DES enfants" with the definite article, when you art talking not about specific, but any children which can go to a summer camp.
Camp d'été SOUNDS correct but is not an idiomatic phrasing that translates transparently. Colonie de vacance is somewhat more common, and you can choose to include "d'été" to specify if you so desire.
The travailler verb is also somewhat more uptight than its "to work" translation, in such a fashion you will often find something that softens the activity of "working for salary" from where it's applied to, either by a second verb being introduced (Eg: J'ai travaillé en colonie de vacances. Je faisais/m'occupais de...).

On escaladait des montagnes, on a ffaisait de kayaking, on a fait unesait de la randonée et on a passéait tout de notres temps en plein air.

Imparfait tense was the correct choice. Describing actions which took place but are indistinctly (That is, you are not describing any singular hike you did, but "doing hiking" as part of the activities) enumerated uses it throughout the whole sentence.

Notre does not take a plural s, because temps is singular, despite ending in S.

C'était a fait le salaire minimumpayé le SMIC, mais j'ai adoré ce travail.

"Minimum wage" is another idiom wearing a mustache. You'll find much more often the SMIC acronym, which is Salaire Minimum Interprofessionel de Croissance. Don't ask me why, I didn't remember what it stood for either, but it is the legal minimum wage in France, and everybody uses the acronym.

Quelle est votre opinion?

Opinion is a feminine word.