The exception proves the rule The exception proves the rule

You could also capitalise your title: The Exception Proves The Rule

In my life I offten hear the phrase "Tthe exception proves the rule" from people, who present this phrase as an argument in different discussions. In my life I often hear the phrase "the exception proves the rule" from people who present this phrase as an argument in different discussions.

In my life I offten hear the phrase "The exception proves the rule" from people, who present this phrase as an argument in different discussions. In my life I often hear the phrase "The exception proves the rule" from people, who present this phrase as an argument in different discussions.

By the phrase they mean -that the existaence of fact that is derived from a commomn case - makes this rule better than it could be without an exceprtion. By the phrase they mean that the existence of fact that is derived from a common case makes this rule better than it could be without an exception.

This sentence is a little confusing - I would recommend rewording it to be a bit shorter/more concise.

By the phrase they mean - the existaence of fact that is derived from a commomn case - makes this rule better than it could be without an exceprtion. By the phrase they mean - the existence of fact that is derived from a common case - makes this rule better than it could be without an exception.

In my opinion, thereis is a small misconceprtion which formed from two momentcauses. In my opinion, this is a small misconception which formed from two causes.

I don't think "moment" works here - I would go for "causes" or "origins". You could also rephrase it was: "... which is due to two reasons."

In my opinion, there is a small misconceprtion which formed from two moments. In my opinion, there is a small misconception which formed from two moments.

The first one that people feel the rule more sharply when among a lot of similar examples / /cases (like a flat floor) your attention hit ois drawn by one uinconvienient exception (like a knock-outn out of place plank). The first one that people feel the rule more sharply when among a lot of similar examples/cases (like a flat floor) your attention is drawn by one inconvenient exception (like an out of place plank).

More natural phrasing: "The first one that people feel the rule more sharply when among a lot of similar examples/cases, your attention is drawn on by one inconvenient exception - for example, on a flat floor, you will immediately notice an out of place plank." Your attention is often DRAWN by something. Not like drawing with a pencil, but attracted towards.

The first one is that people feel the rule more sharply when among a lot of similar examples / cases (like a flat floor) and your attention is hit on by one uinconvienient exception (like a knock-out plank). The first one is that people feel the rule more sharply when among a lot of similar examples /cases (like a flat floor) and your attention is hit on by one inconvenient exception (like a knock-out plank).

And the second one is just as coolthat the phrase sounds and makes able to give a lucky punch tocool and is a punchy saying to counter others in a discussion. And the second one is just that the phrase sounds cool and is a punchy saying to counter others in a discussion.

Punchy = having an immediate impact, forceful, vivid; usually used to describe writing or speech A punch just makes me think of a literal punch, so I don't think it would work well here, though I get what you are going for. You can "counter" someone's argument with your own.

And the second one is just as cool as the phrase sounds and makes you able to give a lucky punch to others in a discussion. And the second one is just as cool as the phrase sounds and makes you able to give a lucky punch to others in a discussion.

My consclusion is simple and obvious - any rule without exceptions is stronger than the same rule with them. My conclusion is simple and obvious - any rule without exceptions is stronger than the same rule with them.

My consclusion is simple and obvious - any rule without exceptions is stronger than the same rule with them. My conclusion is simple and obvious - any rule without exceptions is stronger than the same rule with them.

You could also say "without an exception".