Winged, wolly and oily. Winged, wolly and oily.

Did you mean woolly, as in covered in wool? From your next sentence, it looks like the mouse is the woolly one. Wool specifically applies to sheep, so for a mouse, I would say ‘furry mouse’.

Winged, wololy and oily. Winged, wooly and oily.

I've never heard the word "wolly" before. Did you mean wooly as in wooly mammoth?

On the edge of the forest in a warm house resided three guys - a winged sparrow, a woolly mouse and an oily pancake. On the edge of the forest in a warm house resided three guys - a winged sparrow, a woolly mouse and an oily pancake.

OnAt the edge of the forest in a warm house residlived three guys - a winged sparrow, a wololy mouse, and an oily pancake. At the edge of the forest in a warm house lived three guys - a winged sparrow, a wooly mouse, and an oily pancake.

I changed "resided" to "lived" because "lived" sounds more casual.

The sparrow flew in from a field, the mouse ran away from a cat, and the pancake ran away from a pan. The sparrow flew in from a field, the mouse ran away from a cat, and the pancake ran away from a pan.

The sparrow flew in from a field, the mouse ran away from a cat, and the pancake ran away from a pan. The sparrow flew in from a field, the mouse ran away from a cat, and the pancake ran away from a pan.

They got along with each otherell and didт'n’t offend each other. They got along well and didn’t offend each other.

Your original sentence is correct, but this one just sounds better because you’re not repeating ‘each other’.

Everyone did their job and helped the others. Everyone did their job and helped the others.

The sparrow brought a food - corn from a field, mushrooms from a forest, and beans from a garden. The sparrow brought food - corn from a field, mushrooms from a forest, and beans from a garden.

Food is plural in this case, so you can say ‘brought some food’ or just ‘brought food’.

The sparrow brought a food - corn from a field, mushrooms from a forest, and beans from a garden. The sparrow brought food - corn from a field, mushrooms from a forest, and beans from a garden.

The mouse chopped woods and the pancake cooked soup and porridge. The mouse chopped wood and the pancake cooked soup and porridge.

In general, they lived a good. life. In general, they lived a good life.

Good is an adjective, so if you say ‘a good life’, it’s correct because good describes life. In your original sentence, ‘good’ was used as an adverb, which is incorrect. The adverb version of ‘good’ is ‘well’, as in ‘They lived well’.

In general, they lived goodwell. In general, they lived well.

Technically you should use "well" instead of "good" here, but naturally some people use "good" anyways.

The sparrow often returned from athe forest, washed himself with water and sat on the bench to rest. The sparrow often returned from the forest, washed himself with water and sat on the bench to rest.

The sparrow often returned from athe forest, washed himself with water, and sat on the bench to rest. The sparrow often returned from the forest, washed himself with water, and sat on the bench to rest.

At that time the mouse carried woods, set the table and counted painted spoons. At that time the mouse carried wood, set the table and counted painted spoons.

Wood, like pieces of wood, is plural. When you say woods, what that means is a small forest, i.e. many trees.

At that time, the mouse carried woods, set the table, and counted painted spoons. At that time, the mouse carried wood, set the table, and counted painted spoons.

Wood - plural A piece of wood - singular Also, I've been adding the oxford comma to your lists, but it doesn't absolutely have to be there. Just a preference thing.

And the pancake was beside the bakeoven - blush and lush - was cooking soup and, saltsing it with coarse salt, tastesand tasting the porridge. And the pancake was beside the oven - blush and lush - cooking soup, salting it with coarse salt, and tasting the porridge.

This is a more complicated sentence. 1. I took out an extra ‘was’. Remember, the sentence should make sense even when you read it without the clause you put between dashes. 2. In the second half, with the list of actions, make sure all the verbs match in tense. In this case, I matched them all to -ing.

And the pancake was beside the bakeoven - blush and lush - was cooking soup and. They saltsed it with coarse salt, and tastesd the porridge. And the pancake was beside the oven - blush and lush - was cooking soup. They salted it with coarse salt, and tasted the porridge.

They sat at the table and praised each others. They sat at the table and praised each other.

They sat at the table and praised each others. They sat at the table and praised each other.

It is king foodfood fit for a king." It is food fit for a king."

I jump in the pot and jump back sout so the soup is oily." I jump in the pot and jump back out so the soup is oily."

I jump in the pot and jump back sout, so the soup is oily." I jump in the pot and jump back out, so the soup is oily."

The sparrow eate porridge and praised it: "This is the best porridge I have ever eaten. The sparrow ate porridge and praised it: "This is the best porridge I have ever eaten.

I changed your verbs to past tense because your story so far was written in past tense.

The sparrow eate the porridge and praised it: "This is the best porridge I have ever eaten. The sparrow ate the porridge and praised it: "This is the best porridge I have ever eaten.

I changed the verbs to the past-tense since that is what you used before.

It is hot and crumbly." It is hot and crumbly."

Porridge is usually not crumbly for me lol but the sentence is correct

The mouse answers: "I carried woods, crumbled it and threw in the bakeoven. The mouse answers: "I carried wood, crumbled it and threw in the oven.

I am assuming you mean oven when you say bake. Sorry if that’s wrong! An oven is a device for baking. To bake is a verb.

The mouse answersed: "I carried woods, crumbled it, and threw in the bakeoven. The mouse answered: "I carried wood, crumbled it, and threw in the oven.

Then I swaung my tail so the fire burned better so the porridge became is the best". it could be.” Then I swung my tail so the fire burned better so the porridge became the best it could be.”

Swing (present tense), swung (past) In general, it’s safe to put punctuation marks inside quotations, especially for dialogue.

Then I swang my tail so the fire burned better so that the porridge became is the best". Then I swang my tail so the fire burned better so that the porridge became the best".

The sparrow said: "I am not bad too.either. The sparrow said: "I am not bad either.

The sparrow said: "I am not bad tooeither. The sparrow said: "I am not bad either.

So they lived, praised each other, and didn't offend themselveseach other. So they lived, praised each other, and didn't offend each other.

But then the sparrow thinkought... But then the sparrow thought...

past tense here too

But then the sparrow thinkought... But then the sparrow thought...