Some dDays Some Days

Titles should be capitalised :)

This is the song I have been listening to right now and I feelthis song a lot lately. I connect with it deeply, because I just fiound out that maybe I hadI might have ADD and it's not an easy thing to process. I have been listening to this song a lot lately. I connect with it deeply, because I just found out that I might have ADD and it's not an easy thing to process.

I changed this into more than one sentence, because you wrote a run on sentence. If you think that a sentence feels long, you might want to see if there is a place where a sentence would end. Since I learned about them at a young age, it's hard for me to explain how they work. My best explanation would probably be: If there is more than two sentences in one, you can probably stop a sentence somewhere and start a new one. I chose to make a new sentence where I did because the second two have a cause and effect. This is the song I have been listening to right now -> I have been listening to this song a lot lately. The thing receiving the action always goes after the thing doing the action. "Lately" usually implies something has happened in the past and is still happening. I feel it deeply because I just find out that maybe I had ADD and it's not an easy thing to process. -> I connect with it deeply, because I just found out that I might have ADD and it's not an easy thing to process. When talking about emotions in this way, "connect with" is a more natural way to say it.

This is thea song I ha've been listening to right now and I feellately. I connect with it deeply because I just fiound out that maybe II might hadve ADD, and it's not an easy thing to process. This is a song I've been listening to lately. I connect with it deeply because I just found out that I might have ADD, and it's not an easy thing to process.

"and it's not an easy thing to process." could become "which hasn't been easy to process." Both work, but the latter might be a bit more natural.

This is the song I have been listening to right nowlately, and I feel it deeply because I just find out that maybe I hadI might have ADD, and it's not an easy thing to process. This is the song I have been listening to lately, and I feel it deeply because I just find out that I might have ADD, and it's not an easy thing to process.

- The phrase "have been listening" is in present perfect continuous so using "lately" is more accurate than "right now" because it describes something happening over a recent period of time. - After “just,” we use the past tense “found,” not present tense “find”. - In the phrase "maybe I had ADD," “had” sounds like it’s in the past, but you’re talking about a current possibility so you use "have". - I added a comma before “and it’s not an easy thing to process” because it separates two independent clauses preventing a run-on sentence.

This is the song I have been listening to right now and I feel it deeplately, and I relate to it strongly because I just fiound out that maybe II might hadve ADD, and it's not an easy thing to process. This is the song I have been listening to lately, and I relate to it strongly because I just found out that I might have ADD, and it's not an easy thing to process.

Over the years, I have tried different approaches to studying and I didn't know why anynothing worked for me. Over the years, I have tried different approaches to studying and I didn't know why nothing worked for me.

"Studying" sounds more natural in this context since it happened on a regular basis. Great job on this sentence!

Over the years, I ha've tried different approaches to study and I didn't know why anything worked for meing, but nothing worked and I didn't know why. Over the years, I've tried different approaches to studying, but nothing worked and I didn't know why.

"Anything" can't be negated. So, "I don't know why anything works" is saying, for example, "I don't know why, despite how broken it is, even a single part of this machine is still working. None of it should be working in this state, but by some miracle..."

Over the years, I have tried different approaches to studying, and I didn't know why anything worked for me. Over the years, I have tried different approaches to studying, and I didn't know why anything worked for me.

- "Over the years" is an introductory phrase which should be followed by a comma. - The phrase “approaches to study” should be “approaches to studying” because you use the preposition “to,” so we must use the gerund form (-ing). - The phrase “why anything worked for me” should be “why nothing worked for me” due to logical reasons. If things weren’t successful, we say “nothing worked,” not “anything worked.”

Over the years, I have tried different approaches to study, and I didn't know why anynothing worked for me. Over the years, I have tried different approaches to study, and I didn't know why nothing worked for me.

Now I get to understand why happened that, but that doesn't make it easier. Now I understand, but that doesn't make it easier.

Now I get to understand why happened thatthat was happening, but that doehasn't makde it easier. Now I understand why that was happening, but that hasn't made it easier.

Now I get to understand why that happened that, but that doesn't make it any easier. Now I understand why that happened, but that doesn't make it any easier.

- "Get to” usually implies permission or opportunity, but here, you are expressing a realisation, so its best to say "I understand" to make it more natural. - In indirect questions, we don’t invert the subject and verb, so you keep the structure "why that happened" as opposed to "why happened that." - The phrase “doesn’t make it easier” can be written as “doesn’t make it any easier” as this just makes the sentence more natural and complete in English.

Now I get to understand why that happened that, but that doesn't make it easier. Now I get to understand why that happened, but that doesn't make it easier.

I still struggle the same to study, to keep my focus, towith studying, staying focused, and keeping track of time. I still struggle with studying, staying focused, and keeping track of time.

"Struggle with" is what would be used when talking about a verb or action. I used "still" instead of "the same", because "still" implies something that hasn't stopped. "The same" is used when talking about nouns or items.

I struggle the same towith study, toing, with keeping my focus, toand with keeping track of time. I struggle the same with studying, with keeping my focus, and with keeping track of time.

I struggle the samill struggle to study, to keep mstay focus,ed, and to keep track of time. I still struggle to study, to stay focused, and to keep track of time.

- “The same” doesn’t work naturally here, so you should use “still” to express that the difficulty continues. - “Stay focused” sounds more natural in English than “keep my focus.” - In a list of three things, we normally use commas and “and” before the last one.

I struggle the same to studyo study just the same, to keep my focus, to keep track of time. I struggle to study just the same, to keep my focus, to keep track of time.

But at least I have a cluen idea now about what can it bebe done to fix it. But at least I have an idea now about what can be done to fix it.

There are a lot of ways to fix this. I gave this a more positive attitude, because it made sense to me with this context.

But at least I have a clue now about what can itn idea now why that might've been. But at least I have an idea now why that might've been.

It's very uncommon and strange for someone to say they "have a clue". A "clue" is usually a physical piece of evidence, but an "idea" is a thought or realization in your head. So, you might hear something like "I have no clue where she is!" but you probably won't hear "Well, I might have a clue..."

But at least now I have a clue now about what can itit could be. But at least now I have a clue about what it could be.

- In indirect questions, in this case after the phrase “I have a clue about…," we don’t invert the subject and verb, so it’s “what it could be”, not “what can it be.” - “At least now I have a clue” sounds more natural than “But at least I have a clue now.” Both are technically grammatically correct, but this version flows better.

But at least I have a clue now about what can it bthe cause. But at least I have a clue now about the cause.

Anyways, this song is really good if you have to had the chanche time to listening to it. Anyways, this song is really good if you have the time to listen to it.

"Had" is the past tense of "have", so you don't need to say them twice. "Chance" is probably a literal translation. It still works, but "time" in this sentence is more natural. When you add "-ing" to the end of an action, it implies that it is still happening. It also implies that it has started happening. Since the person has not listened to it yet, you need to leave the verb on its own.

Anyways, this song is really good if you have to had the chanche time to listening to it. Anyways, this song is really good if you have the time to listen to it.

Anyway, this song is really good if you have to hadever get the chance to listening to it. Anyway, this song is really good if you ever get the chance to listen to it.

- Comma after "anyway," as it is an introductory word. - “If you have to had the chance” should be written as “if you ever get the chance.” The original verb structure was incorrect. “Get the chance” is the natural expression here. - After “to," as part of an infinitive, we use the base form "listen", not “listening.” I also added “it” because “listen to” needs an object.

Anyway, this song is really good, if you have to had the chance to listening to it. Anyway, this song is really good, if you have the chance to listen to it.

It's called "Some dDays" by Brent Morgan. It's called "Some Days" by Brent Morgan.