Obviously, the increased availability of resources and improvement of thein technologiesy and rules makde it more possible. Obviously, the increased availability of resources and improvement in technology and rules made it more possible.

The greatness of an individuals The greatness of an individual

In our human race, we always admire the exceptionality of individuals and their great work. In our human race, we always admire the exceptional individuals and their great work.

However, the deciding factors for identifications ofying these exceptional personsople are assessed differently in different ages. However, the deciding factors for identifying these exceptional people are assessed differently in different ages.

This prompt is recommending one the factors regarding this exceptionality where I strongly agree with this recommendation. This prompt is recommending one the factors regarding this exceptionality where I strongly agree with this recommendation.

Sorry, I don't know what you mean here.

In a certaineach era, we can find different kinds of talented and ambitious individuals that seems impeccable, and no one seems not to cross that barrierable to outdo them. In each era, we can find different kinds of talented and ambitious individuals that seems impeccable, and no one seems able to outdo them.

But within a few decades, we can see another perfectionist who crosses theat barrier and surpriseds us. But within a few decades, we can see another perfectionist who crosses that barrier and surprises us.

This is because of the determination, hunger and resources varieds in different ages. This is because the determination, hunger and resources varies in different ages.

For example, Shahid Afridi once scored a hundred within 37 balls and become the owner ofobtained the record ofor the quickest hundred in cricket history and, but later those records awere broken by different batsmen. For example, Shahid Afridi once scored a hundred within 37 balls and obtained the record for the quickest hundred in cricket history, but later those records were broken by different batsmen.

Nonetheless, it is always important to wait for athe time being, tobefore consider ing someone great, exceptional and perfect. Nonetheless, it is always important to wait for the time being, before considering someone great, exceptional and perfect.

Contemporaries aredo not always posedface a significant amount of challenges, for various reasons. Contemporaries do not always face a significant amount of challenges, for various reasons.

This is fine, but it sounds more natural to use active voice ('contemporaries do not always face a significant amount of challenges') over passive ('contemporaries are not always posed...')

That age might be full of different agendas, lack of resources, lack of enough reason “why’’, or paucity of determination. That age might be full of different agendas, lack of resources, lack of enough reason “why’’, or paucity of determination.

In the time of Pele and Maradona-, there were other sports with a lot of attention, the world was rebuilding after wWorld wWar II and the cCold wWar, and the lack of resources and bad rules awere strongly demotivating factors tof the growth of a player. In the time of Pele and Maradona, there were other sports with a lot of attention, the world was rebuilding after World War II and the Cold War, and the lack of resources and bad rules were strongly demotivating factors to the growth of a player.

That’s howwhy we don’t find any better contemporaries that canould contend with these two great players. That’s why we don’t find any contemporaries that could contend with these two great players.

In the case of other fields, Albert Eienstein, and Stephaen Hawkings, are the paragon fors in the field of science fiel, and and since now their contribution cannot be crossedoutdone by any other individuals and that’s how, they are still considered great to datey. In the case of other fields, Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking are paragons in the field of science, and and since now their contribution cannot be outdone by any other individuals, they are still considered great today.

InAmong political paragons, Skeikh Mujibur Rahman from Bangladesh, Abraham lLincoln from the USA and many others are considered great for the same reason. Among political paragons, Skeikh Mujibur Rahman from Bangladesh, Abraham Lincoln from the USA and many others are considered great for the same reason.

Remember to capitalize names.

It would not be imperfect as well as would diminish their hunger and determination. It would not be imperfect as well as would diminish their hunger and determination.

I am not sure what you mean by 'It would not be imperfect'

But in some cases, we can consider someone asthe greatest in the human race in a particular field. But in some cases, we can consider someone the greatest in the human race in a particular field.

One of the examples is are Messi and Ronaldo, who are doing great things every day in the football field and crossesing their own barrierhurdles every day and d. Declaring them great doesn’t losediminish their hunger and determination in a minuscule scat alel. One example are Messi and Ronaldo, who are doing great things every day in the football field and crossing their own hurdles every day. Declaring them great doesn’t diminish their hunger and determination at all.

'Hurdles' sounds better than 'barriers' here. 'Hurdles' has more of a sense of a challenge.

Considering all theseis, I strongly believe that, it is more appropriate to consider oneself assomeone a great individual after waiting a certain period of time, and after that when no one still crosses him, if nobody exceeds him by then, safely declare him as a perfectionist in his own field – rather than quickly reach theing a conclusion by comparing him with his contemporaries. Considering all this, I strongly believe that, it is more appropriate to consider someone a great individual after waiting a certain period of time, and, if nobody exceeds him by then, safely declare him as a perfectionist in his own field – rather than quickly reaching a conclusion by comparing him with his contemporaries.