Why will I major in humanities in this era? Why will I major in humanities in this era?

Why am I majoring in humanities in this era? Why am I majoring in humanities in this era?

Starting from this autumn, I will be an university student who majors in humanities. Starting from this autumn, I will be a university student who majors in humanities.

Starting from this autumn, I will be an university student who majoring in humanities. Starting this autumn, I will be an university student majoring in humanities.

Starting from this autumn, I will be an university student who majors in humanities. Starting from this autumn, I will be a university student who majors in humanities.

(1) "An" is used before vowel SOUNDS, not vowel letters. A word can begin with a vowel letter but not a vowel sound, and the opposite is also true. (2) "I" is singular, so "major" should be singular too ("majors").

Namely, humanities offer a science of human. Namely, humanities offer a science of human.

Namely, humanities offer ateach the science of humans. Namely, humanities teach the science of humans.

Namely, hHumanities offer aare the science of humans. Humanities are the science of humans.

"Namely" is not used this way; rather, it is used to introduce specific examples. Here's an example sentence: "Japan is widely known for its culture, namely anime." (Anime is a specific example of Japanese culture.)

Recently, humanities are often criticized by an unspecified number of people. Recently, humanities are often criticized by an unspecified number of people.

Grammatically correct but "an unspecified number" is an odd thing to say. It's more normal to say "many people."

Recently, humanities arhave often been criticized by man unspecified number ofy people. Recently, humanities have often been criticized by many people.

(1) "Recently" refers to the past, so you should use "have often been" (past tense) instead of "are often" (present tense). (2) "An unspecified number of people" is not a natural expression to use here. It makes it seem like you know the true number and are hiding it for some reason.

It is because humanities are not a (or the) study of practical science. It is because humanities are not a (or the) study of practical science.

It is because humanities are not study of practical sciences. It is because humanities are not practical sciences.

I sympathize with this opinion that a student (or students) who majored in humanities cannot make a lot of money . I sympathize with this opinion that a student (or students) who majored in humanities cannot make a lot of money .

I sympathize thiswith the opinion that students who majored in humanities cannot make a lot of money . I sympathize with the opinion that students who major in humanities cannot make a lot of money .

I sympathize with thise opinion that students who majored in humanities cannot make a lot of money . I sympathize with the opinion that students who majored in humanities cannot make a lot of money .

However I never endorse thise opinion that humanities are not worthy tof studying. However I never endorse the opinion that humanities are not worthy of studying.

However I never endorse thise opinion that humanities are not worthy to studying. However I never endorse the opinion that humanities are not worth studying.

I think "worth studying" sounds more natural.

Since AI havs become conspicuous, many actions which was used to be done by only humans have not been human original activitydone by computers. Since AI has become conspicuous, many actions which used to be done by only humans have been done by computers.

Since AI havs become conspicuous, many actions which was used to be done by only human have not been human original activitypreviously could only be done by humans are now done by AI. Since AI has become conspicuous, many actions which previously could only be done by humans are now done by AI.

Since AI have conspicus become ubiquitous, many actionvities which was used to be done by only human have not been human original activitys are no longer as such. Since AI has become ubiquitous, many activities which used to be done by only humans are no longer as such.

(1) "AI" is singular, so "have" should be too ("has"). (2) I question the use of "conspicuous" here. Allow me to suggest "ubiquitous" or "prevalent". (3) "Actions" doesn't seem like the most appropriate word here. I'd suggest "activities". (4) I reworded the second part of your sentence so that it sounds more natural.

I don't say real work is taken over by AI but I say many human action, for example, getting one's idea, checking, making a sentence and communication, are shared with AI. I don't say real work is taken over by AI but I say many human action, for example, getting one's idea, checking, making a sentence and communication, are shared with AI.

I dwon't say real work is taken over by AI, but I will say many human actions, for example, get one'sthinking of an idea, checking, and making a sentence and communication, are shareds, are done with AI. I won't say real work is taken over by AI, but I will say many human actions, for example, thinking of an idea, checking, and making sentences, are done with AI.

I wouldon't say real work ishas been taken over by AI, but I'd say many human action, for example, get one'svities, such as getting ideas, checking, mak (what?), generating a sentences and communication, are shared with AI. I wouldn't say real work has been taken over by AI, but I'd say many human activities, such as getting ideas, checking (what?), generating sentences and communication are shared with AI.

(1) I reworded your sentence so that it sounds more natural. (2) It might be good to state what it is you're "checking".

Nevertheless considerationour ideas and real existence are not bothered by AI. Nevertheless our ideas and real existence are not bothered by AI.

Nevertheless consideration, our thoughts and real existence are not bothered by AI. Nevertheless, our thoughts and real existence are not bothered by AI.

I think the pacing flows better with a comma behind "nevertheless".

When we are musing about our distinctivunique questions, we can say we are doing human activity. When we are musing about our unique questions, we can say we are doing human activity.

When we are musing about our distinctiveown various questions, we can say we are doperforming human activityies. When we are musing about our own various questions, we can say we are performing human activities.

The use of "distinctive" isn't very appropriate here.

Humanities are exist to make humans be human. Humanities exist to make humans be human.

Humanities are exist to make humans be human. Humanities exist to make humans be human.

Humanities are exist to make human bes human. Humanities exist to make humans human.

In the phrase "make humans human", "human" (the second one) is an adjective and not a noun.

When society deletes humanities, we are not even human. When society deletes humanities, we are not even human.

When society deletes humanities, we are not even human. When society deletes humanities, we are not even human.

WhenIf society deletecasts humanities, we are not even human aside, we will become humans no longer. If society casts humanities aside, we will become humans no longer.

I rephrased your sentence so that it sounds more natural and fluent.

For example,: philosophy, literature, history and anthropology. For example: philosophy, literature, history and anthropology.