MORE NATURALLY: They can then spray only on wildinvasive plants and they does'not spray on a safe naturecan avoid overusing herbicides. MORE NATURALLY: They can then spray only on invasive plants and can avoid overusing herbicides.

They can spray only on wild plants and they does'not spray on a safe natureeeds without having to spray over the entire crop. They can spray only on weeds without having to spray over the entire crop.

This is a better translation based on your original text

They can spray only on wild plants and they does'do not spray on a safe nature. They can spray only on wild plants and do not spray on safe nature.

This line is a bit hard to understand so I only fixed the spelling errors instead of grammatical errors too.

They can spray only on wild plants and they does' not spray on a safe nature. They can spray only on wild plants and they do not spray on safe nature.

They can spray only on wild plants and they does'non't spray on a safe nature.normal plants They can spray only on wild plants and they don't spray on normal plants

It is a good idea to save nature and to discrease chemicalsWe should limit herbicide use. We should limit herbicide use.

It is a good idea to savetay natureal and to disecrease chemicals use. It is a good idea to stay natural and to decrease chemicals use.

It is a good idea to save nature and to disecrease the use of chemicals use. It is a good idea to save nature and to decrease the use of chemicals

"It is a good idea to save nature and to decrease chemical usage." Also works.

It is a good idea to save nature and to disecrease chemicals use. It is a good idea to save nature and to decrease chemical use.

It is a good idea to save nature and to discrease reduce the usage of chemicals use. It is a good idea to save nature and to reduce the usage of chemicals

since you are talking about plants, u can also say pesticides, same shit

Moreover, it is more profitable than using big agricultural's machines equipment. Moreover, it is more profitable than using big agricultural equipment.

Equipment is a bit more natural here. Machines by default are envisioned as being immobile.

Moreover, it is more profitable than big agricultural's machines. Moreover, it is more profitable than big agricultural machines.

An apostrophe and an s ('s) at the end of a noun to show ownership of an object. The original sentence with the 's could be grammatically correct if it were written like this: "Moreover, it [is] more profitable than Big Agricultural's machines." where Big Agricultural is the name of a person or an entity who is in possession of the aforementioned machines. However, in this context "big" and "agricultural" are adjectives meaning they are simply describing the machines, they are not nouns so they cannot claim ownership over something which would warrant the 's Apostrophe s ('s) can also be used as a contraction, shorten "it is" into "it's".

Moreover, it is more profitable than big agricultural's machines. Moreover, it is more profitable than big agricultural's machines.

Moreover, it can be more profitable than big agricultural's machines.the big machines already used in agriculture today. Moreover, it can be more profitable than the big machines already used in agriculture today.

These machines areis equipment is very expaensives. This equipment is very expensive.

"Expensive" will never take an S

These machines are very expaensives. These machines are very expensive.

Expansive means big/large which you already mentioned in the previous sentence so saying this again would be redundant (repetitive) so I'm assuming you meant the word "expensive" meaning they cost a lot of money. The 's' at the end of expansives takes the word from singular (one) to plural (multiple). Perhaps you did this because you're referring to multiple machines however in English, adjectives are typically never plural so there should not be an 's' at the end of expansive and/or expensive

These machines are very expaensives. These machines are very expensive.

These machines are very expaensives. These machines are very expensive.

expansive = covers a large era

It'These drones are good for our future. These drones are good for our future.

It's good to return to the subject (drones) to be clear what we are referring to

It's a good for our future. It's good for our future.

A is an article and articles are only necessary before (certain) nouns/noun phrases.

It's a good for our future. It's good for our future.

It'These AI drones are good for our future. These AI drones are good for our future.

be specific

Thank you reading mey post. Thank you reading my post.

Thank you for reading me. Thank you for reading.

The word "for" is necessary to explain why you are saying thank you, it is a preposition which are used to show a relationship between objects, so in this context you would use "for" to connect "Thank you" with the reason why you are thankful: reading. The word "me" is unnecessary because it is a personal pronoun meaning it refers to the speaker and in this case where the reader is being communicated to via an electronic blog post, it comes across as if the blog post is anthropomorphized (human-like) and is the one speaking to the reader and thanking them instead of you, the writer. You can get rid of the word me all together as "Thank you for reading" is a very common phrase. Another way to word this sentence is, "Thank you for reading my post." In this case, the (personal) pronoun me has been substituted for the (possessive) pronoun my, both refer back to the speaker but "my" is used to when talking about something the speaker is in ownership or possession of, in this case your post.

Thank you for reading me. Thank you for reading me.

Thank you reading me. Thank you reading.

"reading me" = looking at someones body language, be careful

My lLatest English rReading My Latest English Reading

In English, titles have certain rules about capitalization

My latest English readingWhat I have read recently in English. What I have read recently in English.

I have come back here to write in eEnglish about m'y recent readings. I have come back here to write in English about my recent readings.

I come'm back to write in eEnglish about m'y latest readings. I'm back to write in English about my latest readings.

"...about my readings" sounds like it is missing something ; adding "latest" helps. Alternative: "...about what I've read lately."

I have come back to write in eEnglish about m'ywhat I have readings. I have come back to write in English about what I have read.

"My readings" might be grammatically correct but am'm not 100% sure, I apologize for my uncertainty. Nevertheless, "what I have read" is a more natural sentence.

I coame back to write in eEnglish about m'y readings. I came back to write in English about my readings.

I coame back to write in english about m'y readings. I came back to write in english about my readings.

OPTION A: I read a news article about AI drones. OPTION B: I read some news about AI drones. OPTION A: I read a news article about AI drones. OPTION B: I read some news about AI drones.

I read a news article about AI drones. I read a news article about AI drones.

I read a news article about an AI drone. I read a news article about an AI drone.

The word "news" is a mass noun meaning it is uncountable so you would have to use a definite (specific) article such as "the" in front of it instead of an indefinite (general) article like "a". So the sentence "I read the news about [an] AI drone." works, however it still has some unsaid implications in this context so it's not the most ideal way to word it. Instead, you can keep the indefinite article "a" if you combine the uncountable noun "news" with a countable noun like "article." This option is the better choice since the news article you read is not explicitly stated; it is indefinite, hence the use of "a" Since "AI drone" is not a proper noun, meaning it is not the official name of something it needs an article before it and because there is no specific"AI drone" mentioned (and it's safe to assume there's more than one in existence) it should be referred to with the indefinite article "an".

I read a news about an AI drone. I read a news about an AI drone.

I read a news about AI drones. I read news about AI drones.

It a good news for MY GUESS: That article wrote about how drones can be used in positive ways to monitor weather planete and natureatterns. MY GUESS: That article wrote about how drones can be used in positive ways to monitor weather patterns.

It a's good news for the planete and nature. It's good news for the planet and nature.

"News" alone isn't countable.

It is a good news forarticle about the planete and nature. It is a good news article about the planet and nature.

It a's good news for the planete and nature. It's good news for the planet and nature.

It aThose AI drones are good news for the planete and mother nature. Those AI drones are good for the planet and mother nature.

you can combine this sentence with the previous one

Now, farmers can use the AI drones to stopdetect weeds oin their fields. Now, farmers can use the AI drones to detect weeds in their fields.

Now, farmers can use the AI drones to stop weeds from growing on their fields. Now, farmers can use AI drones to stop weeds from growing on their fields.

Now, farmers can use the AI drones to stop weeds from growing on their fields. Now, farmers can use the AI drones to stop weeds from growing on their fields.

You have to specify what the weeds are doing on the farmers' fields.

Now, fFarmers can now use the AI drones to stop weeds on their fields. Farmers can now use the AI drones to stop weeds on their fields.

wow