FA few days ago I fiound myself watching an debate between Jack Ma, alibaba founder, and Elon Musk.

I found it so interesting, but twhat fascinated me the most was the lack of knowledge in tech from one of the most richest personople in the world, which is Jack Ma.

This guy haves founded one of the most important companies in asia that uses technology to operate, but he does not seems to be so familiarized with thatis subject.

Anyway, during the debate they were agreeing about how AI could be or could not be a threadt for humans and one of the arguments Jack Ma used to defend his position was, in a few words, that AI is not a threat because if we have the ability to create machines then we are superior, so Iif we are superior then we'll have the capability to keep them under our control.

That argument seems to be logic, I mean if you can create something, sothen you are superior to that thing and if you are superior you wocan't be controlled by thait, but here Jack Ma confuses the means with the ends.

Not because you can create something it means that you are superior to that, indeed we create things because we want to overcome our own limitations.

Not sure what the first half of the sentence is saying.

We have created the telescope or the microscope which are deeply superior to our convenctional eye, but noit isn't just because we were created them it seems that they are inferior, it is our eye that is inferior.

Ok, but we can control the microscopes, but itthis is another fallacy in his argumentation.

Not jJust because you can create sometime,hing, doesn't mean you can take control over it.

SHe said that, it's for sure that AI could represent a threat for human livfe, probably not in the terminator's movie way, but AI is an instrument that can perform a lot of operations in milliseconds in tasks that could cost hours for humans to complete it.

Simple things like our freedom could be threatened because of systems that uses facial recognition to restrict your beliefs or your relations.

Malicious people could use it to control the people or even to track when you are more vulnerable to steal from you, just based on your online behavior.

iIs artificial intelligence a threat for mankind?

First word of the sentence will always be capitalized.

FA few days ago, I fiound myself watching an debate between Elon Musk and Jack Ma, alibabathe founder, and Elon Musk of Alibaba.

"A few days ago" is a introductory phrase, so you must put a comma after it. You can read more here: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/punctuation/commas/commas_after_introductions.html

I find -> I found
By starting out by references the past, your verb also should be in the past tense.

an debate -> a debate
You use "an" when it is placed in front of a word that begins with a vowel sound. (an hour, an owner)
You use "a" when it is placed in front of a word that begins with a consonant sound. (a debate, a horse)

Jack Ma, alibaba founder, and Elon Musk -> Elon Musk and Jack Ma, the founder of Alibaba.
Alibaba needs capitalized because it is the name of a company. Your original phrasing was not bad, but it was confusing. I switched Jack Ma to the end of the sentence so you could add that he was the founder of Alibaba without making it sound like there were three people in the debate.
I also switched it to "the founder of Alibaba" to denote possession, though you could have also said "Alibaba's founder".

I found it so interesting, but twhat fascinated me the most was the lack of knowledge in tech from one of the most richest personople in the world, which is Jack Ma.

You do not need a comma when connecting two phrases.

However, this sentence sounds really awkward all together.

I personally would say something like, "I found the debate very interesting but what fascinated me the most was Jack Ma's lack of knowledge in tech. It surprised me because he is one of the richest people in the world." I think you are trying to cram too much information into one sentence. I separated out him being rich because it is just extra information.

This guy haves founded one of the most important companies in aAsia thatwhich uses technology to operate, bu yet he does not seems to be so familiarized with that subject.

have -> has
"has" is third person singular. Have is third person plural.
He has, They have.

Asia is a proper noun and needs capitalized.

that -> which. I am not entirely sure why I switched this. I do not think using that is wrong, but which sounds better to me.

I used yet because it can be used to infer "in spite of".