Ducky's avatar
Ducky

July 4, 2022

0
Interesting People

If I could speak to anybody, first I would think in famous and interesting persons as Nikola Tesla, Jesús, Marie Curie, Antoni Gaudí, Mozart, Selma Lagerlöf, or Neil Armstrong. But later I considered that also could be interessant to talk with an anonymous person in some moment of the ancient times, like a roman citizen, in the time of Marcus Aurelius Emperor, and for example in 165 AD year. I can imagine a lively conversation talking with a roman family below a big tree, in a sunny afternoon. We are sharing some food and wine, and I asked them a lot of questions about it life, it house, its jobs and anything that I could think. I ask them for instance, about the formulation of roman cement, that resist in bridges very well 2000 years later. I assume they would ask me questions too. For exemple, why I ask them so much.

Corrections

Interesting People

If I could speak to anybody, first I would think inof famous and interesting persons such as Nikola Tesla, Jesúus, Marie Curie, Antoni Gaudí, Mozart, Selma Lagerlöf, or Neil Armstrong.

But later I would considered that talso could be interessant to talkking with an anonymous person in some moment of the ancient times, like a rRoman citizen, in the time of Marcus Aurelius Emperor, and for example in 130 AD year would also be interesting.

I can imagine a lively conversation talking with a rRoman family below a big tree, ion a sunny afternoon.

We arewould sharinge some food and wine, and I would asked them a lot of questions about it life, it house, its jobstheir lives, and anything that I could think.

"about their lives, and anything that I could think." the comma after "lives" is called the oxford comma. Leaving out the comma is also technically correct, but adding the comma is considered superior to those who have a deep understanding of English grammar or were taught right.

I would ask them for instance, about the formulation of rthe Roman cement, that resist inholds together bridges very well 2000 years later.

I assume they would ask me questions too.

For exemple, wWhy I ask them so muchany questions, for example.

Feedback

Overall very good.

lilyoftheprairie's avatar
lilyoftheprairie

July 4, 2022

0

It's a title, so people would be capitalized. All words in a title except a, the, an, and a couple other similar words are not capitalized in titles, unless they are the first word in a title.

Interesting Ppeople

I wouldn’t capitalise people

If I could speak to anybody, first I would think inof famous and interesting personsople such as Nikola Tesla, Jesús, Marie Curie, Antoni Gaudí, Mozart, Selma Lagerlöf, or Neil Armstrong.

But lLater, I considered that alsoit could also be interessantting to talk with an anonymous person in some moment of theunknown person who lived in ancient times, like a roman citizen, in the time of Marcus Aurelius Emperor, and for example in 130 AD year.

I can imagine a lively conversation, talking with a roman family below a big tree, ion a sunny afternoon.

We arwould be sharing some food and wine, and I could asked them a lot of questions about itheir life, itheir house, itstheir jobs and anything else that I could think. of.

I could ask them for instance, about the formulation of roman cement, that resistis found in bridges very wellin good condition 2000 years later.

I assume they would ask me questions too.

For exemple, why I do ask them so muchany questions.

lilyoftheprairie's avatar
lilyoftheprairie

July 4, 2022

0

Interesting Ppeople

It's a title, so people would be capitalized. All words in a title except a, the, an, and a couple other similar words are not capitalized in titles, unless they are the first word in a title.

Interesting People

If I could speak to anybody, first I would think inof famous and interesting personsople, such as Nikola Tesla, Jesús, Marie Curie, Antoni Gaudí, Mozart, Selma Lagerlöf, or Neil Armstrong.

It sounds a lot more natural to use "people" in this context. "Persons" isn't used very often in English and sounds very formal.

But later I considered that it also could be interessantting to talk with an anonymous person infrom some moment of thein ancient times, like a roman citizen, in the time of Emperor Marcus Aurelius Emperor, and for example in the year 130 AD year.

I can imagine a lively conversation talking with a rRoman family below a big tree, ion a sunny afternoon.

You can just write: "conversation with [person]".

We are sharing some food and wine, and I asked them a lot of questions about it life, itheir house, itstheir jobs and anything else that I could think of.

Since you are talking about "them", the possessive pronoun would be "their".

I ask them, for instance, about the formulation of rRoman cement, that resistworks very well in bridges very well 2000 years later.

I assume they would ask me questions too.

For exeample, why I ask them so much.

Feedback

Good job! I agree that it would definitely be interesting to know more about the lives of ancient people. If we could travel back in time, just think of everything they could tell us! :D

Interesting People


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Interesting Ppeople

I wouldn’t capitalise people

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

If I could speak to anybody, first I would think in famous and interesting persons as Nikola Tesla, Jesús, Marie Curie, Antoni Gaudí, Mozart, Selma Lagerlöf, or Neil Armstrong.


If I could speak to anybody, first I would think inof famous and interesting personsople, such as Nikola Tesla, Jesús, Marie Curie, Antoni Gaudí, Mozart, Selma Lagerlöf, or Neil Armstrong.

It sounds a lot more natural to use "people" in this context. "Persons" isn't used very often in English and sounds very formal.

If I could speak to anybody, first I would think inof famous and interesting personsople such as Nikola Tesla, Jesús, Marie Curie, Antoni Gaudí, Mozart, Selma Lagerlöf, or Neil Armstrong.

If I could speak to anybody, first I would think inof famous and interesting persons such as Nikola Tesla, Jesúus, Marie Curie, Antoni Gaudí, Mozart, Selma Lagerlöf, or Neil Armstrong.

But later I considered that also could be interessant to talk with an anonymous person in some moment of the ancient times, like a roman citizen, in the time of Marcus Aurelius Emperor, and for example in 130 AD year.


But later I considered that it also could be interessantting to talk with an anonymous person infrom some moment of thein ancient times, like a roman citizen, in the time of Emperor Marcus Aurelius Emperor, and for example in the year 130 AD year.

But lLater, I considered that alsoit could also be interessantting to talk with an anonymous person in some moment of theunknown person who lived in ancient times, like a roman citizen, in the time of Marcus Aurelius Emperor, and for example in 130 AD year.

But later I would considered that talso could be interessant to talkking with an anonymous person in some moment of the ancient times, like a rRoman citizen, in the time of Marcus Aurelius Emperor, and for example in 130 AD year would also be interesting.

I can imagine a lively conversation talking with a roman family below a big tree, in a sunny afternoon.


I can imagine a lively conversation talking with a rRoman family below a big tree, ion a sunny afternoon.

You can just write: "conversation with [person]".

I can imagine a lively conversation, talking with a roman family below a big tree, ion a sunny afternoon.

I can imagine a lively conversation talking with a rRoman family below a big tree, ion a sunny afternoon.

We are sharing some food and wine, and I asked them a lot of questions about it life, it house, its jobs and anything that I could think.


We are sharing some food and wine, and I asked them a lot of questions about it life, itheir house, itstheir jobs and anything else that I could think of.

Since you are talking about "them", the possessive pronoun would be "their".

We arwould be sharing some food and wine, and I could asked them a lot of questions about itheir life, itheir house, itstheir jobs and anything else that I could think. of.

We arewould sharinge some food and wine, and I would asked them a lot of questions about it life, it house, its jobstheir lives, and anything that I could think.

"about their lives, and anything that I could think." the comma after "lives" is called the oxford comma. Leaving out the comma is also technically correct, but adding the comma is considered superior to those who have a deep understanding of English grammar or were taught right.

I ask them for instance, about the formulation of roman cement, that resist in bridges very well 2000 years later.


I ask them, for instance, about the formulation of rRoman cement, that resistworks very well in bridges very well 2000 years later.

I could ask them for instance, about the formulation of roman cement, that resistis found in bridges very wellin good condition 2000 years later.

I would ask them for instance, about the formulation of rthe Roman cement, that resist inholds together bridges very well 2000 years later.

I assume they would ask me questions too.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

For exemple, why I ask them so much.


For exeample, why I ask them so much.

For exemple, why I do ask them so muchany questions.

For exemple, wWhy I ask them so muchany questions, for example.

But later I considered that also could be interessant to talk with an anonymous person in some moment of the ancient times, like a roman citizen, in the time of Marcus Aurelius Emperor, and for example in 165 AD year.


You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium