May 20, 2025
Ingmar Bergman
A writer that obssesed with undrestanding 'the after'. The general theme of his movies are focused on the death and the questions about after that but at this poit that exaggerated curiosity turned into some kind of obsession. Watching his movies is way different than others, like you don't think abut something even the movie that you watching, you just stare at the screen. He
prevents you from directly understanding her obsession, you understand that he is obssesive while staring blankly at the black screen.
'Sonrasını' anlamaya takıntılı bir yazar. Onun filmlerinin genel konusu ölüm ve bundan sonrası ile ilgili konulara odaklanmıştır ama bu noktada bu abartılı merak bir çeşit obsesyona dönmüştür. Onun filmlerini izlemek diğerlerinden farklıdır, mesela filmi izlerken bir şey düşünmezsiniz izlediğiniz filmi bile, sadece ekrana dik dik bakarsınız. Obsesyonunu doğrudan anlamanızı engeller, onun obsesif olduğunu ekrana boş boş bakarken anlarsınız.
Ingmar Bergman
A writer thatwho is obssessed with undrerstanding '"the after'".
It's not wrong to use "that" here, but when talking about people, it's slightly more natural to use "who". "The apple THAT I ate. The person WHO gave it to me."
This can happen with every interrogative word EXCEPT "what":
People: "The person WHO gave it to me."
Things/Ideas: "The apple THAT I ate."
Time periods: "The year WHEN I was born."
Places: "The hotel WHERE I stayed."
Reasons: "The reason WHY I'm doing this."
The general theme of his movies are focused on the death and the questions about after that but at this poiwhat happens after it, but that exaggerated curiosity turneds into some kind of obsession.
Abstract concepts like "death", "life", "youth", "creativity", etc; don't usually use articles like "the" or "a".
"At this point" doesn't feel right here, and it's difficult to describe why. "At this point" feels like it should describe something NEW that is happening because of something that has been CHANGING. For instance, if I have a job, but every year my pay gets lower and lower, one year the pay may be so low that I would say, "Well, at this point, I may as well quit!"
Watching his movies is way different thanfrom watching others, l. Like, you don't think about someanything, not even the movie that you're watching, y. You just stare at the screen.
Using "like" as an interjection is very informal and colloquial (in the West Coast where I'm from especially).
He
¶ prevents you from directly understanding heris obsession, you. You just understand that he is obssessive while staring blankly at the black screen.
He/his/him She/her/her They/their/them
The use of "her" implied that we were talking about a completely different person, one who was a woman.
I've used "just" for more emphasis. It is often used in sentences like this, but it's difficult for me to describe exactly how it works.
Feedback
Hope this helps! Keep it up!
May 21, 2025
Teşekkür ederim
|
Ingmar Bergman This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
A writer that obssesed with undrestanding 'the after'. A writer It's not wrong to use "that" here, but when talking about people, it's slightly more natural to use "who". "The apple THAT I ate. The person WHO gave it to me." This can happen with every interrogative word EXCEPT "what": People: "The person WHO gave it to me." Things/Ideas: "The apple THAT I ate." Time periods: "The year WHEN I was born." Places: "The hotel WHERE I stayed." Reasons: "The reason WHY I'm doing this." |
|
The general theme of his movies are focused on the death and the questions about after that but at this poit that exaggerated curiosity turned into some kind of obsession. The general theme of his movies are focused on Abstract concepts like "death", "life", "youth", "creativity", etc; don't usually use articles like "the" or "a". "At this point" doesn't feel right here, and it's difficult to describe why. "At this point" feels like it should describe something NEW that is happening because of something that has been CHANGING. For instance, if I have a job, but every year my pay gets lower and lower, one year the pay may be so low that I would say, "Well, at this point, I may as well quit!" |
|
Watching his movies is way different than others, like you don't think abut something even the movie that you watching, you just stare at the screen. Watching his movies is way different Using "like" as an interjection is very informal and colloquial (in the West Coast where I'm from especially). |
|
He prevents you from directly understanding her obsession, you understand that he is obssesive while staring blankly at the black screen. He He/his/him She/her/her They/their/them The use of "her" implied that we were talking about a completely different person, one who was a woman. I've used "just" for more emphasis. It is often used in sentences like this, but it's difficult for me to describe exactly how it works. |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium