Democracy,It used to be said, that democracy was a reliable system, and able to confront any obstacle.

However, recently events around the world have exposured the weaknessess of this system of government, and the problems that this system carries withits inherent problems.

Throughout the world, massive manifedemonstrations have taken place.

BesidesAlso, there is a constantly tendencesy towards making democracy a face to face imply that democracy is a battle, where two polarized ideacamps wrestle for power.

The ideas are not battling, the people are battling

TSome people believe, that the current situation has its origin inbeen made worse by the rise of the modern "information technology."

Although innoffensive at first glance, has dividedsocial media has accentuated pushing society into two partcamps, not only in political issues, but in almost all the things related to social life.

In the same way, news haves also been also a means of dividpushing society, mainly because the p apart. People who use mobile phones tend to search only the things which are related withand social media may tend to only see news which supports their own ideas.

Thus, they only receivsee what they want to hearsee, therefore ignoring othe other´s ideasr points of view.

As a result, people prefer to hearlisten to populist politicians than to hear reliable and factual information.

To sum up, technology is, has been, and will be a menace to democracy, but. The future of democracy resides oin the capacity of democracy to get used to this new "fellow" and to establish the constraints when it isich are necessary hifor its own survival.

Only with this approach, will democracy will be guaranteed to the future generations, so freedom will be safeand freedom will be safe for future generations.

Democracy, used to be said, wasviewed as being a reliable system, and able to confront that can face any obstacle.

However, recently events around the world have exposured the weaknessess of this system of government, and the problems thatof this system carries with.

Throughout the world, masive manifestations have taken place.

you could also use the word "protests"

BesidesIn a democracy, there is a constantly tendences towards making democracy a face to face battle, whery to have two polarizeding ideaologies wrestle each other for power.

The current situation has its origin inoriginated from the riseera of the rise of modern "information technology."

Although innofesive at first glance, has divided society in two parts, not only in political issues, but in almost all the things relatedt appears to be innovative in the beginning, but it has since divided society politically and socially into two social life.parts.

In the same way, news have been also a means ofs also played a role in dividing the society, mainly because the people who use mobile phones tend to search only for the things which are related withthat support their own ideas.

Thus, they only receiveabsorb what they want to hear, thereforwhile ignoring othe other´s ideas.r points of view.

As a result, people prefer to hear populist politicians than to hearrather than reliable and factual information.

Undoubtedly, this ishas been and will continue to be a big threat to democracy.

To sum up, technology is, has been, and will continue to be a menace to democracy, but resides on the capacity of democracy to get used to this new "fellow" and to establish constraints when it is necessary his own survival.

I'm not sure I understand the second part of your sentence. Whose survival? who is the "new fellow? technology or new media?

Only with this approach, could democracy willand freedom be guaranteed to thefor future generations, so freedom will be safe.