izgiyesildal's avatar
izgiyesildal

March 5, 2022

0
IELTS Writing Task 2

TASK:

The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking.

To what extend do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.



ANSWER:
Mobile phone usage is increasing dramatically and there is a belief that the use of mobile phones are just antisocial as smoking therefore it should be banned in some places like smoking. I do not agree that cell phones are antisocial as smoking however thay should be restricted in some areas.

First of all, smoking is the source of some biggest health problems such as lung cancer and tumours. It is not just harmful to the smoker but also to people nearby considering they also breath in the smoke that hangs in the air. While cigarettes, in fact, disturb everyone at any circumstances, mobile phones do not cause a problem or irritation on indiviual use. It is possible to put a phone on a silent mode but impossible to block smoke from a cigarette.

On the other hand, there are some circumstances where even a phone on a silent mode can be disturbing such as cinema or theatre. There is no doubt that they are essential to comminication and emergencies. However the light of the screen will glow in the dark even though it is on lowest setting and irritate other viewers moreover disturb the actors. To overcome this problem mobile phones must be banned in these places.

To sum up, smoking is not only antisocial, but harmful to people's healths therefore should be banned in indoors, while mobile phones can only be identified as antisocial in some areas under specific circumstances. That being said, restriction in certain places could be acceptable and must be encouraged.

writingieltsielts academictask 2
Corrections

The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking.

Smoking is banned in certain places, so mobile phones should also be banned likesimilarly to smoking.

To what extendt do you agree or disagree?

Mobile phone usage is increasing dramatically and there is a belief that the use of mobile phones are just as antisocial as smoking is, therefore it should be banned in some places like smoking.

I do not agree that cell phones are just as antisocial as smoking, however, I believe thaey should be restricted in some areas.

First of all, smoking is the source of some of the biggest health problems, such as lung cancer and tumours.

It is not just harmful to the smoker but also to people nearby, considering they also breathe in the smoke that hangs in the air.

While cigarettes, in fact, disturb everyone at any circumstancess plenty of people, mobile phones usage does not cause a problem or irritation on indiviual useothers to get irritated.

It is possible to put a phone on a silent mode but impossible to block smoke from a cigarette.

On the other hand, there are some circumstances where even a phone on a silent mode can be disturbing, such as in a cinema or theatre.

There is no doubt that they are essential to commiunication and emergencies.

However the light of, the screen will's light glows in the dark even though it is on, despite being on the lowest setting and can irritate other viewers moreover disturb the actors.

The screen from a phone will not disturb the actors in the movie.

To overcome this problem, mobile phones mustshould be banned in these kinds of places.

To sum upIn conclusion, smoking is not only antisocial, but also harmful to people's healths and therefore should be banned in indoors, while mobile phones canshould only be identified as antisocial in some areas under specific circumstancbanned in areas where they cause the most disturbance, such as movie theatres.

That being said, restriction in certain places could be acceptable and must be encouraged.

This sentence is unnecessary as you have already finished up your conclusion. However, if you still want to add it, then place it before the conclusion.

IELTS Writing Task 2


TASK:


The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking.


The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking.

Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking.


Smoking is banned in certain places, so mobile phones should also be banned likesimilarly to smoking.

To what extend do you agree or disagree?


To what extendt do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.


ANSWER:


Mobile phone usage is increasing dramatically and there is a belief that the use of mobile phones are just antisocial as smoking therefore it should be banned in some places like smoking.


Mobile phone usage is increasing dramatically and there is a belief that the use of mobile phones are just as antisocial as smoking is, therefore it should be banned in some places like smoking.

I do not agree that cell phones are antisocial as smoking however thay should be restricted in some areas.


I do not agree that cell phones are just as antisocial as smoking, however, I believe thaey should be restricted in some areas.

First of all, smoking is the source of some biggest health problems such as lung cancer and tumours.


First of all, smoking is the source of some of the biggest health problems, such as lung cancer and tumours.

It is not just harmful to the smoker but also to people nearby considering they also breath in the smoke that hangs in the air.


It is not just harmful to the smoker but also to people nearby, considering they also breathe in the smoke that hangs in the air.

While cigarettes, in fact, disturb everyone at any circumstances, mobile phones do not cause a problem or irritation on indiviual use.


While cigarettes, in fact, disturb everyone at any circumstancess plenty of people, mobile phones usage does not cause a problem or irritation on indiviual useothers to get irritated.

It is possible to put a phone on a silent mode but impossible to block smoke from a cigarette.


It is possible to put a phone on a silent mode but impossible to block smoke from a cigarette.

On the other hand, there are some circumstances where even a phone on a silent mode can be disturbing such as cinema or theatre.


On the other hand, there are some circumstances where even a phone on a silent mode can be disturbing, such as in a cinema or theatre.

There is no doubt that they are essential to comminication and emergencies.


There is no doubt that they are essential to commiunication and emergencies.

However the light of the screen will glow in the dark even though it is on lowest setting and irritate other viewers moreover disturb the actors.


However the light of, the screen will's light glows in the dark even though it is on, despite being on the lowest setting and can irritate other viewers moreover disturb the actors.

The screen from a phone will not disturb the actors in the movie.

To overcome this problem mobile phones must be banned in these places.


To overcome this problem, mobile phones mustshould be banned in these kinds of places.

To sum up, smoking is not only antisocial, but harmful to people's healths therefore should be banned in indoors, while mobile phones can only be identified as antisocial in some areas under specific circumstances.


To sum upIn conclusion, smoking is not only antisocial, but also harmful to people's healths and therefore should be banned in indoors, while mobile phones canshould only be identified as antisocial in some areas under specific circumstancbanned in areas where they cause the most disturbance, such as movie theatres.

That being said, restriction in certain places could be acceptable and must be encouraged.


That being said, restriction in certain places could be acceptable and must be encouraged.

This sentence is unnecessary as you have already finished up your conclusion. However, if you still want to add it, then place it before the conclusion.

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium