Ielts aAcademic wWriting - 1

Capitalization

Tests and examinations are central features of school systems in many countries.

Pluralization (matching)

Do you think the educational benefits of testing outweigh any disadvantages.?

Question mark

After the revolution, middle and low class masspeople could access education.

Wording

When the number of students increased, educational systems needed a method for giving equal information to every students a to measure their knowledge of them.

Word order/clarity

This model created the basis of the test and examination system, that today is used in many countries.

The education system in the 1900s focused mainly on how to manage increasing population of students without disputes and preparinge them for working in fabricsctories (?).

Not really sure what you meant by "fabrics"

The examination aimed to only measure the information, that students could memorize.

This means a student could have an extraordinary gift for painting but still could be unsuccessful at school, because he/she could not solve mathematical problems.

This issue geot bigger with time and ministries of education of different countries attempted to overcome this.

There is no examination in elementary schools and the school system centerings around the emotional development of children, there is also no university exam, this keeps teenagers awayless stressed and gives them time to develop their personality.

There is no doubt in my mind that the examination system should change, but I also cannot give an alternative for measureing the knowledge of students objectively.

I think, the method that Scandinavian countries are currently using does not fits to all countries.

The demographic structure of most of them are similar and their population is low.

I think their method is not suitable for countries, that hasve overpopulation, low educational levels and unstable schooling systems.

Plural

Thisese countries need an objective general examination system.

In conclusion, the examination system ishas been criticized in past decades and it continues today.

Different countries are attempting to change this old fashioned educational measuring system with different solutions but there is still no one size model that is suitable for all countries, and because of ithis the testing system remains in most of the countries.

Do you think the educational benefits of testing outweigh any disadvantages.?

After the revolution, middle and low class mthe masses of the low and middle class could access education.

When the number of students increased, the educational system needed a method forto givinge equal information to every students a measure the knowledge of them.

not sure i understand what you meant in this sentence by "equal information" and "measure the knowledge" (should be 'measure their knowledge')

This model created the basis of the test and examination system, that todayis used in many countries today.

The education system in 1900s focused mainly how to manage increasing population of students without dispute and preparing them for working in fabrics.

The examination aimed only to measure the information, that students could memorize.

you usually won't put a comma before that (this is not always true but it's good to remember. comma before 'which', not before that)

This means that a student could have extraordinary gift for painting but still could be unsuccessful at school, because he/ or she could not solve mathematical problems.

This issue get bigger withrew time and ministries of education of different countries attempted to overcome this.

Scandinavian countries are well known instances of good examinations and school systems.

There is no examination in elementary schools and school systems centering on the emotional development of children, t. There is also no university exam, thisconsequently keepsing teenagers away stress and giveing them time to develop their personality.

Students and parents in other countries compare the examination systems and criticize itto those in Scandinavia and criticize the systems of their own countries.

There is no doubt in my mind that the examination system should change, but I also cannot give an alternative forto objectively measure the knowledge of students objectively.

I think, the method that Scandinavian countries currently usinge does not fits to all countries.

The demographic structure of most of them are similar and their population iss are low.

I think their method iss are not suitable for countries, that hasve overpopulation, low educational levels and unstable schooling systems.

you use plural because you're referring to multiple countries and therefore multiple systems

In conclusion, the examination system ishas been criticized in pasthroughout the past few decades and it continues to be criticized.

Different countries are attempting to change this old fashioned educational measuringevaluation system with different solutions, but there is still no one size model that is suitable for all countries, b. Because of ithis, a testing system remains in most of the countries of the world.

Ielts aELTS Academic wWriting -1

All words but particles and articles usually get capitalised in titles.

Before the industrial revolution, proper education was only available for highupper class people.

After the revolution, middle and lower class masses could access education.

When the number of students increased, the educational system needed a method for giving equal information to every student as a measure of their knowledge of them.

This model created the basis of the test and examination system, that todayis still used in many countries today.

The education system in 1900s focused mainly on how to manage the increasing populationnumbers of students without dispute and to preparinge them for working in fabctorices.

The examination aimed only at measureing the information, that students could memorize.

This means that a student could have an extraordinary gift for painting, but still couldcould still be unsuccessful at school, because he/she could not solve mathematical problems.

This issue geot bigger withover time and ministries of education of different countries attempted to overcome this.

Scandinavian countries are well known instances of a good examination and school system.

There is no examination in elementary schools and the school system centerings on the emotional development of children, there is also no university exam, this keeps teenagers away stresstress away from teenagers and gives them time to develop their personality.

Students and parents in other countries compare the examination systems and criticize itheir own.

I think that's what you meant ....

There is no doubt in my mind that the examination system should change, but I also cannot give an alternative for measureing the knowledge of students objectively.

I think, that the method Scandinavian countries currently usinge is not fits tosuitable for all countries.

The demographic structures of most of them are similar and their population is low.

I think their method is not suitable for countries, that hasve overpopulation, a low educational level and an unstable schooling system.

Thisese countries need an objective general examination system.

In conclusion,: the examination system iwas criticized inover the past decades and it continues to be criticized.

DThough different countries are attempting to change this old fashioned educational measuringement system with different solutions ,there is still no one size fits all model that is suitable for all countries, and because of ithis the testing system remains the same in most of the countries.