I need to correct this urgent academic essay for a diploma.

YoumnHassan

April 17, 2025

I need to correct this urgent academic essay for a diploma.

Contingency theory proposes that leadership is not a one-size-fits-all approach. Leadership should not be predetermined by universal or inherent qualities. Understanding the complexity of human behavior is of interest because leadership is primarily driven by people. This theory considers situational factors, task structure, followers’ backgrounds, needs, and environment. Therefore, this article argues that contingency theory is the most comprehensive framework to use in leadership positions. A prime example of this argument is the prime minister of Malaysia, Mahathir Mohamed. His trajectory presents adaptation to the requirements of the situation.
Contingency leadership style appeared as a response to trait and behavioral styles, which suggested that certain traits define effective leaders. However, Fred Fiedler believed that leadership effectiveness depends on how the leader tackles the situation at hand. Fiedler also categorized leaders as either task-oriented or relationship-oriented, depending on the leader’s focus (Northouse, 2021). He suggests that the degree of effective leadership is determined by several factors such as control and influence that the leader has in a particular situation. In addition to the level of support and cooperation from team members. For example, Zigarmi and Roberts (2017) reported that when leaders change their style based on followers’ needs, it is positively related to job affect, trust, and favorable work intentions.
This theory is illustrated effectively through Mahathir Mohamad, the Prime Minister of Malaysia. He used contingency theory throughout his leadership career. In the 1980s and 1990s, he adapted a transformational style to push Malaysia towards a transition from overdependence on the west to coalition with the east. Consequently, he initiated a move called east policy. He took advantage of his country`s strength points and identity to build strong ties with more advanced countries that share his country’s culture and values. In 1997, he shifted to an authoritarian style to address the financial crisis that led to an economic collapse. He rejected the IMF conditions and imposed capital controls. Even though other countries resorted to these trends. He took bold moves but eventually Malaysia recovered faster than the other neighboring countries. In 2010, when he returned as Prime Minister at the age of 92, he decided to ally with his former rival, Anwar Ibrahim. This demonstrated a collaborative style when it came to the country’s benefit. The shift between leadership styles shows explicitly how Mahathir constantly recognizes his country, and people’s needs and changed his leadership style accordingly.
By and large, Mahathir Mohamad differentiated between leadership theories to address the tasks and the situations in place. He demonstrated authoritarian leadership during a crisis, collaboration during political shifts, and transformational leadership during change. His legacy underscores the key aspect of this theory that there is no single best way to lead. Leadership style should be adapted according to the situational demands.

englisheducationessayacademic

en 1

Corrections

shadowfax26

I need to correct this urgent academic essay for a diploma.

Contingency theory proposes that leadership is not a one-size-fits-all approach.

Leadership should not be predetermined by universal principles or inherent qualities.

This theory considers situational factors, task structure, followers’ backgrounds, needs, and environment.

Therefore, this article argues that contingency theory is the most comprehensive framework to use in leadership positions.

A prime example of this argument is the prime minister of Malaysia, Mahathir Mohamed.

His trajectory ~~presents adaptation to the requirements of the situation~~illustrates his ability to adapt to situational requirements.

CThe contingency leadership style appeared as a response to trait and behavioral styles, which suggested that certain traits define effective leaders.

However, Fred Fiedler believed that leadership effectiveness depends on how the leader tackles the situation at hand.

Fiedler also categorized leaders as either task-oriented or relationship-oriented, depending on the leader’s focus (Northouse, 2021).

He suggests that the degree of effective leadership is determined by several factors such as control and influence that the leader has in a particular situation.,

~~In addition to~~and the level of support and cooperation from team members.

For example, Zigarmi and Roberts (2017) reported that when leaders change their style based on followers’ needs, it is positively related to job affect, trust, and favorable work intentions.

This theory is illustrated effectively through Mahathir Mohamad, the Prime Minister of Malaysia.

He used contingency theory throughout his leadership career.

In the 1980s and 1990s, he adapted a transformational style to push Malaysia towards a transition from overdependence on the wWest to coalition with the eEast.

Consequently, he initiated a move called east policy.

He took advantage of his country`s strength points and identity to build strong ties with more advanced countries that share his country’s culture and values.

In 1997, he shifted to an authoritarian style to address the financial crisis that led to an economic collapse.

He rejected the IMF conditions and imposed capital controls.,

Eeven though other countries ~~resorted to these~~followed more conventional trends.

He took bold moves but eventually Malaysia recovered faster than the other neighboring countries.

In 2010, when he returned as Prime Minister at the age of 92, he decided to ally with his former rival, Anwar Ibrahim.

This demonstrated a collaborative style when it came to the country’s benefit.

The shift between leadership styles shows explicitly how Mahathir constantly recognizes his country, and people’s needs and changed his leadership style accordingly.

By and large, Mahathir Mohamad differentiated between leadership theories to address the tasks and the situations in place.

He demonstrated authoritarian leadership during a crisis, collaboration during political shifts, and transformational leadership during change.

His legacy underscores the key aspect of this theory that there is no single best way to lead.

Leadership style should be adapted according to the situational demands.

I need to correct this urgent academic essay for a diploma.