heatedcanine's avatar
heatedcanine

June 26, 2024

1
I Love in Here Already!

I've been more comfortable on here than on Nyan-8, for several reasons.
I seldom use Nyan-8 now because I feel uncomfortable there.
I can get much more corrections by native English speakers on LangCorrect.
It's obvious that the number of "active" native English speaker participants here is much more than Nyan-8.
System itself seems better here because we don't need to *speak ill of other members or other correction makers here. (*speak ill of ---> mention something negative)
(In other words, members are disassociated with each other than Nyan-8, except the writer and the corrections maker's relationship itself.)
As a result, there is much less chance to have opinion conflictions here.
On the contrary, you can get more close to members on Nyan-8, you can feel more friendly there, but only until you will have opinion confictions.

Making a group in order to attack other group is one of the human nature, I'm afraid to say. But I believe making such a group here seems much more difficult or even impossible here. It's because the system overall is different.

It is so common that the more you get closer to someone, the more you will find their demerits as well as merits.

In short, it is very simple; members who prefers here are coming here, and membrs who prefers there are coming there, and someone who prefer both would come to the both.

By the way, my "rate" has risen to 3.84% from 1.17% today because of the rule change, thanks to the administrators.
I hope this place is becoming even bertter with those chanegs, and I don't wish it will affect negatively, such as getting less corrections than before.

Thanks!

Corrections

I Love int Here Already!

I've been more comfortable on here than on Nyan-8, and for several reasons.

I seldom use Nyan-8 now because I feel uncomfortable there.

I can get much more corrections by native English speakers here on LangCorrect.

It's obvious that the number of "active" native English speaker participants here is much more than Nyan-8.

SThe system itself seems better here because we don't need to *speak ill of other members or other correction makers here.

(*speak ill of ---> mention something negative) (In other words, members are disassociated with each other than Nyan-8, except the writer and the corrections maker's relationship itself.)

As a result, there is much less chance to have opinion conflictions here.

On the contrary, you can get more close to members on Nyan-8, you can feel more friendly there, but that’s only until you will have opinion conflictions .

MUnfortunately, making a group in order to attack another group is one of thesimply human nature, I'm afraid to say.

But I believe making such a group here seems much more difficult or even impossible here.

It's because the system overall is different.

It is so common that the more you get closer to someone, the more you will find their demerits as well as merits.

In short, it is veryt’s plain simple; members who prefers here are coming here, and members who prefers there are coming there, ago. And someone who prefers both would come to thedance between both.

“Plain simple” is a more natural way to say “very simple”

By the way, my "rate" has risen to 3.84% from 1.17% today because of thea rule change, thanks to by the administrators.

Thanks!

Feedback

Very good entry overall! Sorry for the late correction, I’ve been a bit busy

I Love inIt Here Already!

I've b feenl more comfortable on here than on Nyan-8, for several reasons.

I seldom use Nyan-8 now because I feel uncomfortable there.

I can get much more corrections byfeedback from native English speakers on LangCorrect.

Or: "many more corrections"

It's obvious that the number of "active" native English speaker participants here is much morehigher than on Nyan-8.

SThe system itself seems better here because we don't need to *speak ill of other members or other correction makeors here.

Do people speak ill of other members on Nyan-8? :(((

(*speak ill of ---> mention something negative)
(In other words,
members are disassociatedcorrecting members have less to do with each other than on Nyan-8, except the writer but it meands the corrections maker's relationship itselfre is a stronger relationship between the writer and the corrector.)

I think this is what you mean! "Disassociated from each other" sounds a little negative, like LangCorrect members don't care about each other (in a mean way) xD

As a result, there is a much lessower chance tof have opinioning conflicting opinions here.

On the contrary,However, while you can get more closer to members on Nyan-8, you can feel more friendly there, but only until you will have opinionit will only be friendly until you have conflicting opinions.

Making a group in order to attack other group is one of the human nature, I'm safraid to say.

But I believe making such antagonistic groups here seems much more difficult or even impossible here.

It's because the system overall is different.

It is so common that the morecloser you get closer to someone, the more you will find their demeritflaws as well as merittheir strengths.

In short, it is very simple;: members who prefers here are LangCorrect will cominge here, and members who prefers there are coming Nyan-8 will go there, and someonpeople who prefer both would come to theill frequent both.

By the way, my "rate" has risen to 3.84% from 1.17% today because of the rule change, thanks to the administrators.

I hope this place is becominges even bertter with thosee new chaneges, and I don't wishhope it willon't affect us negatively, such as getting lessfewer corrections than before.

Thanks!

Feedback

I LOVE THE NEW RATIO!! It's so wonderful! :D

I've been more comfortable on here than on Nyan-8, for several reasons.

I seldom use Nyan-8 now because I feel uncomfortable there.

I can get muchany more corrections by native English speakers on LangCorrect.

It's obvious that the number of "active" native English speaker participants here is much moregreater than Nyan-8.

SThe system itself seems better here because we don't need to *speak ill of other members or other correction makers here.

(*speak ill of ---> mention something negative)
(In other words, members are
more disassociated with each other than Nyan-8, except the writer and the corrections maker's relationship itself.)

As a result, there is much less chance tof have opinioning a conflict of opinions here.

On the contraryHowever, you can get more close tocloser with members on Nyan-8, you can feel more friendly there , but only until you will have opinionhave a conflict of opinions.

Making a group in order to attack other groups is one of the human nature, I'm afraid to say.

But I believe making such a group here seems much more difficult or even impossible here.

It is so common that the more you get closer to someone, the more you will find their demerits as well as merits.

In short, it is very simple;, members who prefers here are coming here, and membrs who prefers there are comgoing there, and s. Someone who prefers both would come to thuse both.

I hope this placsite is becoming even bertter with those chanegs,ges and I don't wish it will affect negatively, such as gettingthat it doesn’t lead to less corrections than before.

I Love int Here Already!

I've been more comfortable on here than on Nyan-8, for several reasons.

I seldom use Nyan-8 now because I feel uncomfortable there.

I can get much more corrections by native English speakers on LangCorrect.

It's obvious that the number of "active" native English speaker participants here is much more than on Nyan-8.

SThe system itself seems better here because we don't need to *speak ill of other members or other correction makeors here.

'correctors' is more concise

(*speak ill of ---> mention something negative)
(In other words, members are disassociated with each other
than, unlike Nyan-8, except the writer and the corrections makeor's relationship itself.)

I don't know how Nyan-8 works.

As a result, there is much less chance to have opinion conflictions here.

On the contrary, yYou can get more close to members on Nyan-8, you can and the community feels more friendly there, but only until you will have opinion conflictions.

Making a group in order to attack another group is one of thepart of human nature, I'm afraid to say.

But I believe making such a group here seems much more difficult or even impossible here.

It'This is because the system overall is different.

It is so commonoften the case that the morecloser you get closer to someone, the more you will find their demerits as well as merits.

In short, it is very simple; members who prefers it here are coming here, and members who prefers it there are comgoing there, and someone who prefers both would come to the both.

By the way, my "correction rate"io has risen to 3.84% from 1.17% today because of the rule change, thanks to the administrators.

I hope this place is becominges even bertter with those chaneges, and I don't wish it will affecthope it won't bring any negatively effects, such as getting less corrections than before.

Thanks!

Feedback

I think the change is for the better, although corrections will very likely decrease.

I Love inIt Here Already!

I've been more comfortable on here than on Nyan-8, for several reasons.

I seldom use Nyan-8 now because I feel uncomfortable there.

I can get much more corrections by native English speakers on LangCorrect.

It's obvious that the number of "active" native English speaker participants here is much more than Nyan-8.

SThe system itself seems better here because we don't need to *speak ill of other members or other correction makers here.

I'm not sure how Nyan-8 works but unless their algorithm actually requires you to speak ill of others, you don't need the "need to."

(*speak ill of ---> mention something negative)
(In other words, members are
disassociatless involved with each one another than they are on Nyan-8, except the writer and the corrections maker's relationship itself.)

As a result, there is much less chance to have opinion conflictions here.

On theIn contraryst, you can get more closer to members on Nyan-8, you canand it might feel more friendly there, but only until you will have opinionstart having conflicts in opinions.

Making a group in order to attack other group is one of the human nature, I'm afraid to say.

But, I believe making such a group here seems much more difficult or even impossible here.

It's because the system overall is different.

It is so common that the more you get closer to someone, the more you will find their demerits as well as merits.

In short, it is very simple; members who prefers here are coming here, and members who prefers there are comgoing there, and someone who preferlikes both would come to the both.

By the way, my "rate" has risen to 3.84% from 1.17% today because of the rule change, thanks to the administrators.

I hope this place is becominges even bertter with thoese chaneges, and I don't wish it will affecthope it doesn't have a negatively effect, such as getting less corrections than before.

Thanks!

I Love in Here Already!


I Love inIt Here Already!

I Love int Here Already!

I Love inIt Here Already!

I Love int Here Already!

I've been more comfortable on here than on Nyan-8, for several reasons.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

I've been more comfortable on here than on Nyan-8, for several reasons.

I've b feenl more comfortable on here than on Nyan-8, for several reasons.

I've been more comfortable on here than on Nyan-8, and for several reasons.

I seldom use Nyan-8 now because I feel uncomfortable there.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

I seldom use Nyan-8 now because I feel uncomfortable there.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

I can get much more corrections by native English speakers on LangCorrect.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

I can get muchany more corrections by native English speakers on LangCorrect.

I can get much more corrections byfeedback from native English speakers on LangCorrect.

Or: "many more corrections"

I can get much more corrections by native English speakers here on LangCorrect.

It's obvious that the number of "active" native English speaker participants here is much more than Nyan-8.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

It's obvious that the number of "active" native English speaker participants here is much more than on Nyan-8.

It's obvious that the number of "active" native English speaker participants here is much moregreater than Nyan-8.

It's obvious that the number of "active" native English speaker participants here is much morehigher than on Nyan-8.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

System itself seems better here because we don't need to *speak ill of other members or other correction makers here.


SThe system itself seems better here because we don't need to *speak ill of other members or other correction makers here.

I'm not sure how Nyan-8 works but unless their algorithm actually requires you to speak ill of others, you don't need the "need to."

SThe system itself seems better here because we don't need to *speak ill of other members or other correction makeors here.

'correctors' is more concise

SThe system itself seems better here because we don't need to *speak ill of other members or other correction makers here.

SThe system itself seems better here because we don't need to *speak ill of other members or other correction makeors here.

Do people speak ill of other members on Nyan-8? :(((

SThe system itself seems better here because we don't need to *speak ill of other members or other correction makers here.

(*speak ill of ---> mention something negative) (In other words, members are disassociated with each other than Nyan-8, except the writer and the corrections maker's relationship itself.)


(*speak ill of ---> mention something negative)
(In other words, members are
disassociatless involved with each one another than they are on Nyan-8, except the writer and the corrections maker's relationship itself.)

(*speak ill of ---> mention something negative)
(In other words, members are disassociated with each other
than, unlike Nyan-8, except the writer and the corrections makeor's relationship itself.)

I don't know how Nyan-8 works.

(*speak ill of ---> mention something negative)
(In other words, members are
more disassociated with each other than Nyan-8, except the writer and the corrections maker's relationship itself.)

(*speak ill of ---> mention something negative)
(In other words,
members are disassociatedcorrecting members have less to do with each other than on Nyan-8, except the writer but it meands the corrections maker's relationship itselfre is a stronger relationship between the writer and the corrector.)

I think this is what you mean! "Disassociated from each other" sounds a little negative, like LangCorrect members don't care about each other (in a mean way) xD

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

On the contrary, you can get more close to members on Nyan-8, you can feel more friendly there, but only until you will have opinion confictions.


On theIn contraryst, you can get more closer to members on Nyan-8, you canand it might feel more friendly there, but only until you will have opinionstart having conflicts in opinions.

On the contrary, yYou can get more close to members on Nyan-8, you can and the community feels more friendly there, but only until you will have opinion conflictions.

On the contraryHowever, you can get more close tocloser with members on Nyan-8, you can feel more friendly there , but only until you will have opinionhave a conflict of opinions.

On the contrary,However, while you can get more closer to members on Nyan-8, you can feel more friendly there, but only until you will have opinionit will only be friendly until you have conflicting opinions.

On the contrary, you can get more close to members on Nyan-8, you can feel more friendly there, but that’s only until you will have opinion conflictions .

Making a group in order to attack other group is one of the human nature, I'm afraid to say.


Making a group in order to attack other group is one of the human nature, I'm afraid to say.

Making a group in order to attack another group is one of thepart of human nature, I'm afraid to say.

Making a group in order to attack other groups is one of the human nature, I'm afraid to say.

Making a group in order to attack other group is one of the human nature, I'm safraid to say.

MUnfortunately, making a group in order to attack another group is one of thesimply human nature, I'm afraid to say.

But I believe making such a group here seems much more difficult or even impossible here.


But, I believe making such a group here seems much more difficult or even impossible here.

But I believe making such a group here seems much more difficult or even impossible here.

But I believe making such a group here seems much more difficult or even impossible here.

But I believe making such antagonistic groups here seems much more difficult or even impossible here.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

It's because the system overall is different.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

It'This is because the system overall is different.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

As a result, there is much less chance to have opinion conflictions here.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

As a result, there is much less chance to have opinion conflictions here.

As a result, there is much less chance tof have opinioning a conflict of opinions here.

As a result, there is a much lessower chance tof have opinioning conflicting opinions here.

As a result, there is much less chance to have opinion conflictions here.

It is so common that the more you get closer to someone, the more you will find their demerits as well as merits.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

It is so commonoften the case that the morecloser you get closer to someone, the more you will find their demerits as well as merits.

It is so common that the more you get closer to someone, the more you will find their demerits as well as merits.

It is so common that the morecloser you get closer to someone, the more you will find their demeritflaws as well as merittheir strengths.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

By the way, my "rate" has risen to 3.84% from 1.17% today because of the rule change, thanks to the administrators.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

By the way, my "correction rate"io has risen to 3.84% from 1.17% today because of the rule change, thanks to the administrators.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

By the way, my "rate" has risen to 3.84% from 1.17% today because of thea rule change, thanks to by the administrators.

In short, it is very simple; members who prefers here are coming here, and membrs who prefers there are coming there, and someone who prefer both would come to the both.


In short, it is very simple; members who prefers here are coming here, and members who prefers there are comgoing there, and someone who preferlikes both would come to the both.

In short, it is very simple; members who prefers it here are coming here, and members who prefers it there are comgoing there, and someone who prefers both would come to the both.

In short, it is very simple;, members who prefers here are coming here, and membrs who prefers there are comgoing there, and s. Someone who prefers both would come to thuse both.

In short, it is very simple;: members who prefers here are LangCorrect will cominge here, and members who prefers there are coming Nyan-8 will go there, and someonpeople who prefer both would come to theill frequent both.

In short, it is veryt’s plain simple; members who prefers here are coming here, and members who prefers there are coming there, ago. And someone who prefers both would come to thedance between both.

“Plain simple” is a more natural way to say “very simple”

I hope this place is becoming even bertter with those chanegs, and I don't wish it will affect negatively, such as getting less corrections than before.


I hope this place is becominges even bertter with thoese chaneges, and I don't wish it will affecthope it doesn't have a negatively effect, such as getting less corrections than before.

I hope this place is becominges even bertter with those chaneges, and I don't wish it will affecthope it won't bring any negatively effects, such as getting less corrections than before.

I hope this placsite is becoming even bertter with those chanegs,ges and I don't wish it will affect negatively, such as gettingthat it doesn’t lead to less corrections than before.

I hope this place is becominges even bertter with thosee new chaneges, and I don't wishhope it willon't affect us negatively, such as getting lessfewer corrections than before.

Thanks!


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium