alisiah's avatar
alisiah

Sept. 19, 2020

0
Human beings

What is a human being? Do human beings have a main feature? If that is the case that they have, what is this distinctive characteristic? The Greece philosopher Aristotle thinks a human is an animal that speaks. The ability of speaking is something that sets human beings apart from other creatures. By speaking Aristotle means the capability of thinking. Humans are the only creatures who can use their brains to this extent. Ancient philosophers thought that animals act only according to their instincts, not by thinking. This belief still, in the modern age, is common among people and scientists, but some researches have shown that this habitual belief is not necessarily true.
Studies conducted on dolphins have led to this theory that the way dolphins communicate with each other is more complicated than what seemed to be at first. Humans are able to think through language. Language shapes and restricts their thoughts, determines the horizon they can see. Lack or richness of vocabulary within a domain can result in imagining different phenomena. By the language, they can give meaning to their feeling experiences. They can send messages to their fellow peers through words. The common belief about animal language has been that it is composed of a meaningless series of sounds, not representing any signals.
As a result, if the future studies give rise to more sound evidence and prove this theory, then, we can see the end of this old widespread belief which has endured during several millennia.

Corrections

Do human beings have a main feature?

If that is the case that they have,so, what is thits distinctive characteristic?

The Greecek philosopher Aristotle thinks a human is an animal that speaks., because

Tthe ability tof speaking is something twhat sets human beings apart from other creatures.

By speaking, Aristotle means the capability tof thinking.

HIn the past, people believed that humans are the only creatures who can use their brains to this extent.

need to explain to what extent?

AFor example, ancient philosophers thought that animals act only according toby their instincts, and not by thinking.eir thoughts.

This belief still, in the modern age, is common among people and scientists, but some researches have shown that this habitual belief is not necessarilycontinues to be held by people and scientists in the modern age, however, some researches have shown that it may not be true.

Studies conducted on dolphins have led to thise theory that the way dolphins communicate with each other isn a much more complicated than what seemed to be at first.manner than we thought.

Humans are able to think through their language.

Language shapes and restricts their thoughts, and also determines the horizon they canat they see.

Lack or richness of vocabulary within a domain can result in imagining different phenomena.

I have no idea what is being said here. Cannot correct.

By the language, they can give meaning to their feelingThrough words, people can transmit their feelings through personal experiences.

I'm just guessing this is what you are trying to say.

TheyPeople can send messages to their fellow peeach others through words.

The common belief about animal language has beens is that it is composedmade up of a series of a meaningless series of sounds,ounds, which do not representing any signalideas.

As a result, if the future studies give rise to more sound evidence and prove this theoryprovide more evidence that animals do communicate effectively through sounds, then, we can see the end of this old widespread belief which has endured during several millennia.would be able to dispel the beliefs of ancient philosophers.

Feedback

interesting

alisiah's avatar
alisiah

Sept. 26, 2020

0

I'm really grateful.

nschafer888's avatar
nschafer888

Sept. 26, 2020

0

You're welcome

Do human beings have a main featurecharacteristic?

This sounds more natural.

If that is the case that they have, what is this distinctive characteristic?

The Ggreecek philosopher Aristotle thinks a human is an animal that speaks.

The ability tof speaking is something that sets human beings apart from other creatures.

By speaking, Aristotle means the capability tof thinking.

able - you can do it
capable - you can potentially do it

Ancient philosophers thought that animals act only according to their instincts, not bydidn't thinking.

I felt like this made the sentence sound more natural.

This belief is still, in the modern age, is common among people and scientists, but some researchers have shown that this habitual belief is not necessarily true.

Studies conducted on dolphins have led to thise theory that the way dolphins communicate with each other is more complicated than what seemed to be at firstwas previously believed.

You can also say "one another" instead of "each other" but either one works.

Language shapes and restricts their thoughts, and determines the horizon they can see.

Lack orThe richness of vocabulary, or lack thereof, within a domain can result in imagining a different phenomena.

By theThrough language, they can give meaning to their feelings and experiences.

The common belief about animal language has been that it i's composed of a meaningless series of sounds, not representing any signals.

As a result, if the future studies give rise toprovide more sound evidence and prove this theory, then, we can see the end of this old widespread belief, which has endured during several millennia.

Feedback

Great Job!

alisiah's avatar
alisiah

Sept. 26, 2020

0

Thank you very much.

Human beings


What is a human being?


Do human beings have a main feature?


Do human beings have a main featurecharacteristic?

This sounds more natural.

Do human beings have a main feature?

If that is the case that they have, what is this distinctive characteristic?


If that is the case that they have, what is this distinctive characteristic?

If that is the case that they have,so, what is thits distinctive characteristic?

The Greece philosopher Aristotle thinks a human is an animal that speaks.


The Ggreecek philosopher Aristotle thinks a human is an animal that speaks.

The Greecek philosopher Aristotle thinks a human is an animal that speaks., because

The ability of speaking is something that sets human beings apart from other creatures.


The ability tof speaking is something that sets human beings apart from other creatures.

Tthe ability tof speaking is something twhat sets human beings apart from other creatures.

By speaking Aristotle means the capability of thinking.


By speaking, Aristotle means the capability tof thinking.

able - you can do it capable - you can potentially do it

By speaking, Aristotle means the capability tof thinking.

Humans are the only creatures who can use their brains to this extent.


HIn the past, people believed that humans are the only creatures who can use their brains to this extent.

need to explain to what extent?

Ancient philosophers thought that animals act only according to their instincts, not by thinking.


Ancient philosophers thought that animals act only according to their instincts, not bydidn't thinking.

I felt like this made the sentence sound more natural.

AFor example, ancient philosophers thought that animals act only according toby their instincts, and not by thinking.eir thoughts.

This belief still, in the modern age, is common among people and scientists, but some researches have shown that this habitual belief is not necessarily true.


This belief is still, in the modern age, is common among people and scientists, but some researchers have shown that this habitual belief is not necessarily true.

This belief still, in the modern age, is common among people and scientists, but some researches have shown that this habitual belief is not necessarilycontinues to be held by people and scientists in the modern age, however, some researches have shown that it may not be true.

Studies conducted on dolphins have led to this theory that the way dolphins communicate with each other is more complicated than what seemed to be at first.


Studies conducted on dolphins have led to thise theory that the way dolphins communicate with each other is more complicated than what seemed to be at firstwas previously believed.

You can also say "one another" instead of "each other" but either one works.

Studies conducted on dolphins have led to thise theory that the way dolphins communicate with each other isn a much more complicated than what seemed to be at first.manner than we thought.

Humans are able to think through language.


Humans are able to think through their language.

Language shapes and restricts their thoughts, determines the horizon they can see.


Language shapes and restricts their thoughts, and determines the horizon they can see.

Language shapes and restricts their thoughts, and also determines the horizon they canat they see.

Lack or richness of vocabulary within a domain can result in imagining different phenomena.


Lack orThe richness of vocabulary, or lack thereof, within a domain can result in imagining a different phenomena.

Lack or richness of vocabulary within a domain can result in imagining different phenomena.

I have no idea what is being said here. Cannot correct.

By the language, they can give meaning to their feeling experiences.


By theThrough language, they can give meaning to their feelings and experiences.

By the language, they can give meaning to their feelingThrough words, people can transmit their feelings through personal experiences.

I'm just guessing this is what you are trying to say.

They can send messages to their fellow peers through words.


TheyPeople can send messages to their fellow peeach others through words.

The common belief about animal language has been that it is composed of a meaningless series of sounds, not representing any signals.


The common belief about animal language has been that it i's composed of a meaningless series of sounds, not representing any signals.

The common belief about animal language has beens is that it is composedmade up of a series of a meaningless series of sounds,ounds, which do not representing any signalideas.

As a result, if the future studies give rise to more sound evidence and prove this theory, then, we can see the end of this old widespread belief which has endured during several millennia.


As a result, if the future studies give rise toprovide more sound evidence and prove this theory, then, we can see the end of this old widespread belief, which has endured during several millennia.

As a result, if the future studies give rise to more sound evidence and prove this theoryprovide more evidence that animals do communicate effectively through sounds, then, we can see the end of this old widespread belief which has endured during several millennia.would be able to dispel the beliefs of ancient philosophers.

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium