daigorou's avatar
daigorou

yesterday

1
History

I often listen to podcasts about world history.
Radio personalities usually speak objectively because most of world history have been moving without my country until modern times.
Thus, I want to learn my country's history through the eyes in other country.
It surely gives me a new perspective.
But I cannot find good podcasts.

Corrections

History

I often listen to podcasts about world history.

Radio personalitiehosts usually speak objectively because most of world history have been movingunfolded without my country being involved until modern times.

Thus, I want to learn my country's history through the eyes in of another country.

It surely gives me a new perspective.

Feedback

I recently watched a Youtube video about why Japan had been closed to other countries until the mid 19th century, which is why many Japaneses are still wary of foreigners today. Perhaps you've wanted to know what was happening outside of Japan while it was closed, but I wanted to share it with you anyway, because I found it very interesting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTz6DQJH1Og&t=198s

SouthernCross's avatar
SouthernCross

yesterday

1

^ I made a typo! There's no such word as "Japaneses", I meant to type "many Japanese people are still ...".

History

I often listen to podcasts about world history.

Radio personalities usually speak objectively because most of world history have been moving without my country until modern timesy country has not been mentioned in the world history until recently.

Not quite sure what you are trying to say here, so the "correction" is based on my guess on your meaning. However it still does not quite make sense. By objectively did you actually mean in an objecting kind of tone? Since "objective" has a different meaning than "objecting/objection".

Thus, I want to learn my country's history through the eyes inof other countryies.

It would surely gives me a new perspective.

Since it sounds like you haven't found the podcast that gives you this perspective yet, so adding the "would" will give the hypothetical nuance to your sentence.

But I cannot find good podcasts.

History


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

I often listen to podcasts about world history.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Radio personalities usually speak objectively because most of world history have been moving without my country until modern times.


Radio personalities usually speak objectively because most of world history have been moving without my country until modern timesy country has not been mentioned in the world history until recently.

Not quite sure what you are trying to say here, so the "correction" is based on my guess on your meaning. However it still does not quite make sense. By objectively did you actually mean in an objecting kind of tone? Since "objective" has a different meaning than "objecting/objection".

Radio personalitiehosts usually speak objectively because most of world history have been movingunfolded without my country being involved until modern times.

Thus, I want to learn my country's history through the eyes in other country.


Thus, I want to learn my country's history through the eyes inof other countryies.

Thus, I want to learn my country's history through the eyes in of another country.

It surely gives me a new perspective.


It would surely gives me a new perspective.

Since it sounds like you haven't found the podcast that gives you this perspective yet, so adding the "would" will give the hypothetical nuance to your sentence.

It surely gives me a new perspective.

But I cannot find good podcasts.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium