Radio personalities usually speak objectively because most of world's history haves been moving on without my country up until modern times.

Thus, I want to learn about my country's history through the eyes in of another country.

It surely would gives me a new perspective.

But I cannot find any good podcasts.

Radio personalitiehosts usually speak objectively because most of world history have been movingunfolded without my country being involved until modern times.

Thus, I want to learn my country's history through the eyes in of another country.

It surely gives me a new perspective.

Radio personalities usually speak objectively because most of world history have been moving without my country until modern timesy country has not been mentioned in the world history until recently.

Not quite sure what you are trying to say here, so the "correction" is based on my guess on your meaning. However it still does not quite make sense. By objectively did you actually mean in an objecting kind of tone? Since "objective" has a different meaning than "objecting/objection".

Thus, I want to learn my country's history through the eyes inof other countryies.

It would surely gives me a new perspective.

Since it sounds like you haven't found the podcast that gives you this perspective yet, so adding the "would" will give the hypothetical nuance to your sentence.