Aug. 2, 2022
Hidden variables in a physical system
Roboticists at Columbia University developed an AI which reportedly has discovered "new" physical variables in a dynamic system. They explain that a double pendula was used in this experiment. This system can be described by four state variables (angle and angular velocity of each pendulum). However, this AI found two "new" variables which can be used to describe mathematically the system.
Nevertheless, this raises a few questions. For instance, are these variables a linear combination of other physical variables? The roboticists stated that the "new" variables do not correlate with angular velocity. However, this does not signify that this set of variables is not a linear combination of the angular velocity of each pendulum. It seems this AI is still at an early stage of development. Thus, hypothesis cannot be discarded.
Consequently, if the AI findings are indeed a new set of variables to describe the double pendula. Then it would mean there is a complete branch of physics to be discovered. Even though it's unlikely it would lead to a theory of unification, finding new ways of seeing the world can take mankind really far.
Euler, Newton and Lagrange did an excellent job describing these dynamic systems. Who would be the next genius?
Hidden vVariables in a pPhysical sSystem
This system can be described by four state variables (the angle and angular velocity of each pendulum).
However, this AI found two "new"additional variables which can be used to describe mathematically describe the system.
Nevertheless, this finding raises a few questions.
Generally, we want to qualify "this" with something specific - it helps with clarity!
The roboticists stated that the "new"ly discovered variables do not correlate with angular velocity.
Thus, the hypothesis cannot be discard(refuted/dismissed).
Consequently, if the AI findings are indeed a new set of variables to describe the double pendula, then it would signify that there is a completely new branch of physics to be discovered.
Combined to make a complete sentence.
Then it would mean there is a complete branch of physics to be discovered.
Even though it' is unlikely it wouldto lead to a theory of unification, finding new ways of seeing the world can take mankind really far.
Removed contraction in "it's" and "really" for more consistency in tone. Just comes off as more formal to me!
Who would(might/will) be the next genius?
Feedback
Excellent!
Roboticists at Columbia University developed an AI which reportedly has discovered "new" physical variables in a dynamic system.
They explain that a double pendula was used in this experiment.
This system can be described by four state variables, the (angle and angular velocity of each pendulum).
This is mostly a stylistic change, to avoid using parenthesis.
However, this AI found two "new" variables which can be used to describe the system mathematically the system.
"...which can be used to mathematically describe the system" is also ok.
Nevertheless, this raises a few questions.
For instance, are these variables a linear combination of other physical variables?
The roboticists stated that the "new" variables do not correlate with angular velocity.
It seems this AI is still at an early stage of development.
Thus, the hypothesis cannot be discarded.
Consequently, if the AI findings are indeed a new set of variables to describe the double pendula, then it would mean there is a completely new branch of physics to be discovered.
These two ideas work better as one sentence.
Then it would mean there is a complete branch of physics to be discovered.
Even though it's unlikely it would lead to a theory of unification, finding new ways of seeing the world can take mankind really far.
Euler, Newton and Lagrange did an excellent job describing these dynamic systems.
Who wouldill be the next genius?
Feedback
This was interesting to read!
Hidden vVariables in a pPhysical sSystem
We usually capitalize the first letter of important words in a title
Roboticists at Columbia University developed an AI which reportedly has discovered "new" physical variables in a dynamic system.
They explain that a double pendula was used in this experiment.
This system can be described by four state variables (the angle and angular velocity of each pendulum).
However, this AI found two "new"previously undiscovered variables which can be used to describeexplain the system mathematically the system.
Nevertheless, this raises a few questions.
For instance, are these variables a linear combination of other physical variables?
The roboticists stated that the "new"recently discovered variables do not correlate with angular velocity.
However, this does not necessarily signify that this set of variables is not a linear combination of the angular velocity of each pendulum.
It seems that this AI is still at an early stage of development.
Thus, this hypothesis cannot be discardeasily dismissed.
Consequently, if the AI findings arhave indeed a newfound another set of variables which can be used to describe the double pendula then it would mean that there's a complete branch of physics yet to be discovered.
The original phrase isn't a complete sentence so I added the next sentence to complete it.
Then it would mean there is a complete branch of physics to be discovered.
I added this fragment to the previous sentence fragment.
Even though it's unlikely it would lead to a theory of unification, finding new ways of seeing the world can take mankind really far.
Euler, Newton and Lagrange did an excellent job describing these dynamic systems.
Who wouldill be the next genius?
Feedback
Good job!
|
Hidden variables in a physical system Hidden We usually capitalize the first letter of important words in a title Hidden |
|
Roboticists at Columbia University developed an AI which reportedly has discovered "new" physical variables in a dynamic system. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
They explain that a double pendula was used in this experiment. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
This system can be described by four state variables (angle and angular velocity of each pendulum). This system can be described by four state variables (the angle and angular velocity of each pendulum). This system can be described by four state variables, the This is mostly a stylistic change, to avoid using parenthesis. This system can be described by four state variables (the angle and angular velocity of each pendulum). |
|
However, this AI found two "new" variables which can be used to describe mathematically the system. However, this AI found two However, this AI found two "new" variables which can be used to describe the system mathematically "...which can be used to mathematically describe the system" is also ok. However, this AI found two |
|
Nevertheless, this raises a few questions. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! Nevertheless, this finding raises a few questions. Generally, we want to qualify "this" with something specific - it helps with clarity! |
|
For instance, are these variables a linear combination of other physical variables? This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The roboticists stated that the "new" variables do not correlate with angular velocity. The roboticists stated that the This sentence has been marked as perfect! The roboticists stated that the |
|
However, this does not signify that this set of variables is not a linear combination of the angular velocity of each pendulum. However, this does not necessarily signify that this set of variables is not a linear combination of the angular velocity of each pendulum. |
|
It seems this AI is still at an early stage of development. It seems that this AI is still at an early stage of development. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Thus, hypothesis cannot be discarded. Thus, this hypothesis cannot be Thus, the hypothesis cannot be discarded. Thus, the hypothesis cannot be |
|
Consequently, if the AI findings are indeed a new set of variables to describe the double pendula. Consequently, if the AI findings The original phrase isn't a complete sentence so I added the next sentence to complete it. Consequently, if the AI findings are indeed a new set of variables to describe the double pendula, then it would mean there is a completely new branch of physics to be discovered. These two ideas work better as one sentence. Consequently, if the AI findings are indeed a new set of variables to describe the double pendula, then it would signify that there is a completely new branch of physics to be discovered. Combined to make a complete sentence. |
|
Then it would mean there is a complete branch of physics to be discovered.
I added this fragment to the previous sentence fragment.
|
|
Even though it's unlikely it would lead to a theory of unification, finding new ways of seeing the world can take mankind really far. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! Even though it Removed contraction in "it's" and "really" for more consistency in tone. Just comes off as more formal to me! |
|
Euler, Newton and Lagrange did an excellent job describing these dynamic systems. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Who would be the next genius? Who w Who w Who |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium