gGlobalization Globalization

The reading and the lecture are bothoday's lecture and reading are about the influences of globalization. Today's lecture and reading are about the influences of globalization.

A bit of context here would help a lot. Which reading and lecture? Who is giving the lecture/reading?

Theis reading and the lecture are both about the influences of globalization. This reading and lecture are about the influences of globalization.

Whereas tThe author of the reading states that globalization brings up some benefits, whereas the lecturer casts doubts on the main point made in the reading by providing three reasons. counterpoints. The author of the reading states that globalization brings up some benefits, whereas the lecturer casts doubts on the main point made in the reading by providing three counterpoints.

Whereasile the author of the reading states that globalization brings up some benefits, the lecturer casts doubts on the main point made in the reading by providing three reasons. counterpoints. While the author of the reading states that globalization brings up some benefits, the lecturer casts doubts by providing three counterpoints.

To begin with, according to the reading, globalization gives a chance to people, who liveliving in developing nations, to survive on low spend in daily life because tha tight budget since products are cheap. To begin with, according to the reading, globalization gives a chance to people, living in developing nations, to survive on a tight budget since products are cheap.

To begin with, according to the reading, globalization gives a chance to people, who liveing in developing nations, survive on low spend in daily life because the products are cheap. To begin with, according to the reading, globalization gives a chance to people living in developing nations, survive on low spend in daily life because the products are cheap.

The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer.To counter this point, the lecturer suggest possible danger of reliance on the global market. To counter this point, the lecturer suggest possible danger of reliance on the global market.

The specific argument is challenged by the lecturerlecturer challenges this argument by suggesting that there lies a danger on the reliance of the global market. The lecturer challenges this argument by suggesting that there lies a danger on the reliance of the global market.

He suggests that there is a danger of reliance on the global market.

Moreover, he takespoints at the financial crisis in 2008 for example,where neither the U.S.A. Moreover, he points at the financial crisis in 2008 where neither the U.S.A.

S.

A nor Europe suffered from the economic crash and recession. nor Europe suffered from the economic crash and recession.

Secondly, the writer demonstrates that oneshows another of the benefits of globalization is: people can purchase a nice quality of objects at a reasonable price. Secondly, the writer shows another of the benefits of globalization: people can purchase nice quality objects at a reasonable price.

Secondly, the writer demonstrates that one of points to another benefits of globalization is: people can purchase a nice quality of objects at a reasonable prices. Secondly, the writer points to another benefit of globalization: people can purchase quality objects at reasonable prices.

If you meant to say "quantity," then "people can purchase a nice quantity of objects at reasonable prices" is how I'd phrase it.

Nevertheless, the lecturer rebuts this by mentioning that some factorcompanies have sent their work to other countries for cheaper workerslabor. Nevertheless, the lecturer rebuts this by mentioning that some companies have sent their work to other countries for cheaper labor.

Furthermore, he presentsAnd that because of this, there are fewer job opportunities in the original placecountry. And that because of this, there are fewer job opportunities in the original country.

TV industries, for example, used to make content in America, but now have moved to Mexico for lower labor cost. TV industries, for example, used to make content in America, but now have moved to Mexico for lower labor cost.

I'm just filling the blanks here.

The American TV industriesy, for example, used to make in America, but now move tonow makes content in Mexico for lowcheaper labor cost. The American TV industry, for example, now makes content in Mexico for cheaper labor cost.

Finally, the author of the reading posits that governments are protecting their own residents’ livfe quality. Finally, the author of the reading posits that governments are protecting their own residents’ life quality.

Finally, the author of the reading posits that governments are protecting their own residents’ live quality of life. Finally, the author of the reading posits that governments are protecting their own residents’ quality of life.

You can say "life quality," but it is far more common to hear and read "quality of life." It also sounds much more natural.

In contrast, the lecturer’s position is that developing countries produce cheap products and export goods whichat the cost of contaminateing the environment, such as air pollution. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is that developing countries produce cheap products and export goods at the cost of contaminating the environment.

Thus, global trade increases cheap goods and productions are often environments harmful. but is often harmful to the environment. Thus, global trade increases cheap goods and production but is often harmful to the environment.