July 18, 2021
Golden Slumber
I have finished reading "Golden Slumber"! It took me more than a month to read it. At the beginning, I thought it was boring, so I read quit slowly.
The atmosphere of the book is stressful. Just like you are confronting a strong power which is everywhere. But the worse is you don't know where is it. You have to keep escaping again and again. It is similar with "1984", but it is worse than it. Because in "1984", most people are facing the same question, whereas in "Golden Slumber", only the main actor is confronting the circumstance like that.
He is unlucky to be trapped, but he is also lucky in some points. He has several good friends in college, he has lots of wonderful memories with them. When he is escaping, he gets a number of help. Some of which is from strangers. Obivating the part of inference, the novel also is a urban novel.
Golden Slumber
I have finished reading "Golden Slumber"!
It took me more than a month to read it.
AtIn the beginning, I thought it was boring, so I read quite slowly.
The atmosphere of the bookplot is stressful.
JustIt feels like you are confronting a strong power whichthat is everywhere.
But the worse isthing is that you don't know where is it.
Because in "1984", most people are facing the same questionpredicament, whereas in "Golden Slumber", only the main actor is confronting theis type of circumstance like that.
He is unlucky to be trapped, but he is also lucky in some pointways.
HFor example, he has several good friends in college, and he has lots of wonderful memories with them.
When he is escaping, he gets a numberreceives a lot of help.
S, some of which is from strangers.
I would add this to your previous sentence.
Obivating the part of inference, the novel also is a urban novel.
Not sure what you mean by the part of inference.
Obviating is not used often, it does not suit the tone of the rest of your article.
July 19, 2021
Obivating the part of inference, the novel also is a urban novel.
I've learned the word "obviate"recently, so I think I can use it right now. I want to say that this is a book regarding as dectective novel, but I could't recommand the right word to describe so I looked up a dictionary and then find"reference".
What I want to mean is: omit the part of detective, the novel is also an urban novel.
July 20, 2021
I've learned the word "obviate"recently, so I think I can use it right now. I want to say that this is a book regarding as dectective novel, but I could't recommand the right word to describe so I looked up a dictionary and then find"reference". What I want to mean is: omit the part of detective, the novel is also an urban novel.
Obviating does not necessarily mean to omit, it has a more avoid and preventative meaning.
For example: To obviate disaster or to obviate the possibility of harm.
With respect to the word "inference", the only relation to the word "detective" I can see is that detectives use the tool of inference as a thinking process to solve cases, for example "She inferred from the blood stain that something funny was going on". However, inference cannot encapsulate the meaning of detective and people will have a hard time understanding that you mean detective by just writing inference.
You could say: Aside from being a detective story, this novel is also an urban fiction.
July 20, 2021
Obviating does not necessarily mean to omit, it has a more avoid and preventative meaning. For example: To obviate disaster or to obviate the possibility of harm. With respect to the word "inference", the only relation to the word "detective" I can see is that detectives use the tool of inference as a thinking process to solve cases, for example "She inferred from the blood stain that something funny was going on". However, inference cannot encapsulate the meaning of detective and people will have a hard time understanding that you mean detective by just writing inference. You could say: Aside from being a detective story, this novel is also an urban fiction.
got it
Golden Slumber
I have finished reading "Golden Slumber"!
It took me more than a month to read it.
AtIn the beginning, I thought it was boring, so I read quite slowly.
"At" refers more to like a shorter, more specific period of time when you started, versus "in" is more that longer period of initial boredom.
The atmosphere of the book is stressful.
Just like you are confronting a strong power whichthat is everywhere.
Just a note that that is not technically a complete sentence. It can be used like this for stylistic emphasis, but it's not "proper" (and in this case, I would actually still connect it to the previous sentence like "The atmosphere of the book is stressful, just . . ." or ". . . is stressful—just . . ."
But thewhat's worset is you don't know where ist its.
"Is it" is the modified word order used in questions, but you should use the typical one here because it's a statement.
You have to keep escaping again and again.
It is similar with "1984"," but it is worse than it.
Periods and commas always go in quotation marks for American English (it's different in British English).
Because in "1984"," most people are facing the same question, whereas in "Golden Slumber"," only the main actor is confronting the circumstance like that.
I'd recommend combining this with the previous sentence. You can start a sentence with a subordinating conjunction in common usage these days (at least that's the convention most people use, if not the "proper" rule), but I wouldn't do so here because the flow is weird (the first sentence, as in the previous one, is really short comparatively).
He is unlucky to be trapped, but he is also lucky inat some points.
He has several good friends in college, and he has lots of wonderful memories with them.
Whilen he is escaping, he gets a number of helplot of help, some of which is from strangers.
Some of which is from strangers.
Combine into the previous sentence because this isn't a full sentence.
Obiviating the part of inference, the novel also is an urban novel.
Not sure what "part of inference" is referring to. Also, "obviate" is seldom used; I wouldn't recommend it for the tone you employ throughout the rest of the entry.
|
Golden Slumber This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
I have finished reading "Golden Slumber"! This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
It took me more than a month to read it. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
At the beginning, I thought it was boring, so I read quit slowly.
"At" refers more to like a shorter, more specific period of time when you started, versus "in" is more that longer period of initial boredom.
|
|
The atmosphere of the book is stressful. This sentence has been marked as perfect! The atmosphere of the |
|
Just like you are confronting a strong power which is everywhere. Just like you are confronting a strong power Just a note that that is not technically a complete sentence. It can be used like this for stylistic emphasis, but it's not "proper" (and in this case, I would actually still connect it to the previous sentence like "The atmosphere of the book is stressful, just . . ." or ". . . is stressful—just . . ."
|
|
But the worse is you don't know where is it. But "Is it" is the modified word order used in questions, but you should use the typical one here because it's a statement. But the worse |
|
You have to keep escaping again and again. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
It is similar with "1984", but it is worse than it. It is similar with "1984 Periods and commas always go in quotation marks for American English (it's different in British English). |
|
Because in "1984", most people are facing the same question, whereas in "Golden Slumber", only the main actor is confronting the circumstance like that. Because in "1984 I'd recommend combining this with the previous sentence. You can start a sentence with a subordinating conjunction in common usage these days (at least that's the convention most people use, if not the "proper" rule), but I wouldn't do so here because the flow is weird (the first sentence, as in the previous one, is really short comparatively). Because in "1984", most people are facing the same |
|
He is unlucky to be trapped, but he is also lucky in some points. He is unlucky to be trapped, but he is also lucky He is unlucky to be trapped, but he is also lucky in some |
|
He has several good friends in college, he has lots of wonderful memories with them. He has several good friends in college, and he has lots of wonderful memories with them.
|
|
When he is escaping, he gets a number of help. While When he is escaping, he |
|
Some of which is from strangers.
Combine into the previous sentence because this isn't a full sentence.
I would add this to your previous sentence. |
|
Obivating the part of inference, the novel also is a urban novel. Ob Not sure what "part of inference" is referring to. Also, "obviate" is seldom used; I wouldn't recommend it for the tone you employ throughout the rest of the entry. Obivating the part of inference, the novel also is a urban novel. Not sure what you mean by the part of inference. Obviating is not used often, it does not suit the tone of the rest of your article. |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium