Nov. 15, 2019
globalization
The reading and the lecture are both about the influences of globalization. Whereas the author of the reading stats that globalization brings up some benefits, the lecturer casts doubts on the main point made in the reading by providing three reasons.
To begin with, according to the reading, globalization gives a chance to people, who live in developing nations, survive on low spend in daily life because the products are cheap. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He suggests that there is a danger of reliance on the global market.
Moreover, he takes the financial crisis in 2008 for example, neither the U.S.A nor Europe suffered from the economic crash and recession.
Secondly, the writer demonstrates that one of the benefits of globalization is people can purchase a nice quality of objects at a reasonable price. Nevertheless, the lecturer rebuts this by mentioning that some factories have sent their work to other countries for cheaper workers. Furthermore, he presents that because of this, there are fewer job opportunities in the original place. TV industries, for example, used to make in America, but now move to Mexico for lower labor cost.
Finally, the author of the reading posits that governments are protecting own residents’ live quality. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is that developing countries produce cheap products and export goods which contaminate the environment, such as air pollution. Thus, global trade increases cheap goods and productions are often environments harmful.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about the perspectives of the globalization, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
Theis reading and the lecture are both about the influences of globalization.
Whereasile the author of the reading states that globalization brings up some benefits, the lecturer casts doubts on the main point made in the reading by providing three reasons.
¶counterpoints.¶
¶
To begin with, according to the reading, globalization gives a chance to people, who liveing in developing nations, survive on low spend in daily life because the products are cheap.
The specific argument is challenged by the lecturerlecturer challenges this argument by suggesting that there lies a danger on the reliance of the global market.
Secondly, the writer demonstrates that one of points to another benefits of globalization is: people can purchase a nice quality of objects at a reasonable prices.
If you meant to say "quantity," then "people can purchase a nice quantity of objects at reasonable prices" is how I'd phrase it.
The American TV industriesy, for example, used to make in America, but now move tonow makes content in Mexico for lowcheaper labor cost.
¶¶
¶
Finally, the author of the reading posits that governments are protecting their own residents’ live quality of life.
You can say "life quality," but it is far more common to hear and read "quality of life." It also sounds much more natural.
Nov. 16, 2019
To begin with, according to the reading, globalization gives a chance to people, who liveing in developing nations, survive on low spend in daily life because the products are cheap.
Ahh, I didn't finish this one. It should be: To begin with, the author believes that globalization provides people living in developing nations a chance to survive on low income since the products are cheap.
gGlobalization
The reading and the lecture are bothoday's lecture and reading are about the influences of globalization.
A bit of context here would help a lot. Which reading and lecture? Who is giving the lecture/reading?
Whereas tThe author of the reading states that globalization brings up some benefits, whereas the lecturer casts doubts on the main point made in the reading by providing three reasons.
¶counterpoints.¶
¶
To begin with, according to the reading, globalization gives a chance to people, who liveliving in developing nations, to survive on low spend in daily life because tha tight budget since products are cheap.
The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer.To counter this point, the lecturer suggest possible danger of reliance on the global market.
He suggests that there is a danger of reliance on the global market.
¶
Moreover, he takespoints at the financial crisis in 2008 for example,where neither the U.S.A.
S.
A nor Europe suffered from the economic crash and recession.
¶¶
¶
Secondly, the writer demonstrates that oneshows another of the benefits of globalization is: people can purchase a nice quality of objects at a reasonable price.
Nevertheless, the lecturer rebuts this by mentioning that some factorcompanies have sent their work to other countries for cheaper workerslabor.
Furthermore, he presentsAnd that because of this, there are fewer job opportunities in the original placecountry.
TV industries, for example, used to make content in America, but now have moved to Mexico for lower labor cost.
¶¶
¶
I'm just filling the blanks here.
Finally, the author of the reading posits that governments are protecting their own residents’ livfe quality.
In contrast, the lecturer’s position is that developing countries produce cheap products and export goods whichat the cost of contaminateing the environment, such as air pollution.
Thus, global trade increases cheap goods and productions are often environments harmful.
¶ but is often harmful to the environment.¶
¶
Nov. 15, 2019
I appreciated it 😀
|
globalization
|
|
The reading and the lecture are both about the influences of globalization. T A bit of context here would help a lot. Which reading and lecture? Who is giving the lecture/reading? Th |
|
Whereas the author of the reading stats that globalization brings up some benefits, the lecturer casts doubts on the main point made in the reading by providing three reasons.
|
|
To begin with, according to the reading, globalization gives a chance to people, who live in developing nations, survive on low spend in daily life because the products are cheap. To begin with, according to the reading, globalization gives a chance to people, To begin with, according to the reading, globalization gives a chance to people |
|
The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer.
|
|
He suggests that there is a danger of reliance on the global market.
|
|
Moreover, he takes the financial crisis in 2008 for example, neither the U. Moreover, he |
|
S.
|
|
A nor Europe suffered from the economic crash and recession.
|
|
Secondly, the writer demonstrates that one of the benefits of globalization is people can purchase a nice quality of objects at a reasonable price. Secondly, the writer Secondly, the writer If you meant to say "quantity," then "people can purchase a nice quantity of objects at reasonable prices" is how I'd phrase it. |
|
Nevertheless, the lecturer rebuts this by mentioning that some factories have sent their work to other countries for cheaper workers. Nevertheless, the lecturer rebuts this by mentioning that some |
|
Furthermore, he presents that because of this, there are fewer job opportunities in the original place. |
|
TV industries, for example, used to make in America, but now move to Mexico for lower labor cost. TV industries, for example, used to make content in America, but now have moved to Mexico for lower labor cost. I'm just filling the blanks here. The American TV industr |
|
Finally, the author of the reading posits that governments are protecting own residents’ live quality. Finally, the author of the reading posits that governments are protecting their own residents’ li Finally, the author of the reading posits that governments are protecting their own residents’ You can say "life quality," but it is far more common to hear and read "quality of life." It also sounds much more natural. |
|
In contrast, the lecturer’s position is that developing countries produce cheap products and export goods which contaminate the environment, such as air pollution. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is that developing countries produce cheap products and export goods |
|
Thus, global trade increases cheap goods and productions are often environments harmful. Thus, global trade increases cheap goods and production |
|
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about the perspectives of the globalization, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer. |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium