Have you heard about Gregório de Matos (or in similiar english: Gregory Matos)? Have you heard about Gregório de Matos?

I think it is OK to just use the Portugese name.

He was born oin the 17th century XVII, when formerly a big country called Pindorama would become as BrazilBrazil was still known as Pindorama. He was born in the 17th century, when Brazil was still known as Pindorama.

We don't typically use Roman numerals for centuries in English, we just use numbers: "the 20th century", "the 21st century", etc. I would rephrase the last part to make it a bit clearer that this was just the old name for what is now Brazil. Alternative: "before the country of Pindorama became Brazil."

He was born on century XVII, when formerlyin a big country formerly called Pindorama that would become as Brazil. He was born on century XVII, in a big country formerly called Pindorama that would become Brazil.

If you didn't know, in the past, Brazil was once a Portuguese colony and Portugal had two important capitals there: Bahia and Recife. If you didn't know, in the past, Brazil was once a Portuguese colony and Portugal had two important capitals there: Bahia and Recife.

I've added "there" to make it clear these were Portugese capitals in Brazil specifically, and not in Portugal.

One of these cities was borning our main character:, Gregório (Gregory) de Matode Matos, was born in one of these cities. Our main character, Gregório de Matos, was born in one of these cities.

OR: "In one of these cities, our main character Gregório de Matos was born." OR: "One of these cities was the birthplace of our main character, Gregório de Matos." "Borning" is not a word in English --> this word doesn't change much across the different tenses, eg. you would say "he was born", "he will be born", "he had been born", "he is being born", etc

In my opinion, I considerthink that Gregory was a pearson ahead of his time, because in a En era when the State and the Church has been fighting trying to have control of the sociaety and, of course, the Orient and Occident's colonies, besides other kind of things like to censureor the freedom of speech and discard literary work. In my opinion, I think that Gregory was a person ahead of his time, because in an era when the State and the Church has been fighting to have control of the society and, of course, the Orient and Occident's colonies, besides other kind of things like to censor the freedom of speech.

OR: "I consider Gregório a person ahead of this time." "An" before words starting with a vowel (a, e, i, o, u) Censure = an official legal action to express disapproval Censor = to suppress free speech in books, letters, speeches, other media "the Orient and Occident" = I understand what you are saying, but I think it would be more natural to say "the East and the West", as this phrasing is kind of formal or even old-fashioned I wasn't 100% sure what you meant by "discard literary works", so I just removed it. If you kept it in, you would have to add an S to workS, as it is plural.

In my opinion, I consider Gregory was a pearson ahead of his time, because in a En era when the State and the Church hasd been fighting trying to have control of the sociaety and, of course, the Orient and Occident's colonies, besides other kind of things like tothrough censure theing freedom of speech and discarding literary work. In my opinion, Gregory was a person ahead of his time, in an era when the State and the Church had been fighting trying to have control of society and, of course, the Orient and Occident's colonies, through censuring freedom of speech and discarding literary work.

My correction isn't the only possibility but it is one way to make the sentence more concise.

We're talking about the 17th century XVII, when the Inquisition was happening in Europe, problably). We're talking about the 17th century, when the Inquisition was happening in Europe, probably).

But, in Brazil, Gregory had never closed his mouth. But, in Brazil, Gregory never closed his mouth.

But, in Brazil, Gregory had never closed his mouth. But, in Brazil, Gregory never closed his mouth.

He was a poet and he has hated all the people using the same intensity. He was a poet and he has hated all people using the same intensity.

He was a poet and he has hated all the people using the same intensity. He was a poet and he hated all the people using the same intensity.

He hasdidn't hadve any kind of respect aboutfor the bBrazilian people (when formely they were only a explorers), the Pindorama's natives, the bBlack people slaves, the bourgeoisies, the religion'us figures, men, women, allor any of the creatures aliving one at that time. He didn't have any kind of respect for the Brazilian people (when formely they were only explorers), Pindorama's natives, the Black slaves, the bourgeoisies, the religious figures, men, women, or any of the creatures alive at that time.

You typically have respect FOR someone or something Don't forget to capitalise nationalities (eg. Brazilian, Australian, English, etc) Ethnicities are also typically capitalised (eg. Black, Indigenous, Jewish, etc) Either "alive" or "living" AT that time

He hasdidn't hadve any kind of respect aboutfor the bBrazilian people (when formerly they were only a explorers), the Pindorama's natives, the black people slaves, the bourgeoisies, the religion'us figures, men, women, all of the creatures aliving on that time. He didn't have any kind of respect for the Brazilian people (when formerly they were only explorers), the Pindorama's natives, the black people slaves, the bourgeoisies, the religious figures, men, women, all of the creatures living on that time.

He has long poems about them, criticizing their lives and showing their hypocrety along the poemsisy. He has long poems about them, criticizing their lives and showing their hypocrisy.

I think it would be best to remove the last part as you already specified he was writing poems, so it's just a bit repetitive.

He has long poems about them, criticizing their lives and showing their hypocrety alongisy in the poems. He has long poems about them, criticizing their lives and showing their hypocrisy in the poems.

Now the text is extensive, but above all, I totally recomend tohat you google more things about him. Now the text is extensive, but above all, I totally recomend that you google more things about him.

Now the text is extensive, but above all, I totally recommend to googleing more things about him. Now the text is extensive, but above all, I totally recommend googling more things about him.

And my next text is goona be holdinging to provide more informations about him. And my next text is going to provide more information about him.

Information is never pluralised. It is also usually "provided", not "held". You CAN use "gonna" as a shortened form of "going to", but it is extremely informal so I would use it only for texting friends, and not use it in essays like this.

And my next text is goona be holding to containg more informations about him. And my next text is going to contain more information about him.