Oct. 12, 2020
From a review's comment for an academic manuscript.
Considering the paucity of the evidence in the field and the importance of the study subject, I strongly favor this work concerning publication. Nevertheless, several aspects should be considered before acceptance.
The manuscript is rather hard to read. Please redo editing and language correction for better flow. The table notes (the notes being presented below the notes) need to follow the guideline from ICMJE. The numbers in the manuscript should be consistent in format. For example, sensitivity was presented either as 26-61% or 0.86.
Did you mean "p < 0.05" instead of "p ≤ 0.05"?
The results should preferably be described in the result section instead of the discussion section.
Considering the paucity of the evidence in the field and the importance of the study subject, I strongly favor this work concerning publicatione publication of this work.
Nevertheless, several aspects should be considered before acceptance.
The manuscript is rather hard to read.
Please redo the editing and language correctioncorrect the language for a better flow of ideas.
The table notes (the notes being presented below the notes) need to follow the guideline from ICMJE.
The numbers in the manuscript should be consistent in format.
For example, sensitivity was presented either as 26-61% or 0.86.
Did you mean "p < 0.05" instead of "p ≤ 0.05"?
The results should preferably be described in the result section instead of the discussion section.
Oct. 12, 2020
Thank you!
|
From a review's comment for an academic manuscript. |
|
Considering the paucity of the evidence in the field and the importance of the study subject, I strongly favor this work concerning publication. Considering the paucity of |
|
Nevertheless, several aspects should be considered before acceptance. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The manuscript is rather hard to read. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Please redo editing and language correction for better flow. Please redo the editing and |
|
The table notes (the notes being presented below the notes)need to follow the guideline from ICMJE. |
|
The numbers in the manuscript should be consistent in format. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
For example, sensitivity was presented as either 26-61% or 0.86. |
|
Did you mean "p < 0.05" instead of "p ≤ 0.05"? This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The results should preferably be described in the result section instead of the discussion section. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The table notes (the notes being presented below the notes) need to follow the guideline from ICMJE. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
For example, sensitivity was presented either as 26-61% or 0.86. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium