I read a passage on the difference of diets between the poor and the affluent. Extensive research suggested that the limited food skills leads to the nutrition-poor dietary of the poor. However, the reality is more likely to be that there no remarkable differences of food knowledge between the poor and the affluent and the determinant of food security is the food price. I read a passage on the difference of diets between the poor and the affluent. Extensive research suggested that the limited food skills leads to the nutrition-poor dietary of the poor. However, the reality is more likely to be that there no remarkable differences of food knowledge between the poor and the affluent and the determinant of food security is the food price.

I read a passage on the difference of diets betweenbetween diets of the poor andversus the affluent. Extensive research suggested that the limited food skills of the poor leads to the nutrition-poor dietary of the poor.s. However, the reality is more likely to be thereat there is no remarkable difference of food knowledge between the poor and the affluent, and the determinant of food security is the food price. I read a passage on the difference between diets of the poor versus the affluent. Extensive research suggested that the limited food skills of the poor leads to the nutrition-poor diets. However, the reality is more likely to be that there is no remarkable difference of food knowledge between the poor and the affluent, and the determinant of food security is the food price.

Couple changes here to make the sentences flow more naturally but overall it was very easy to understand

I read a passage on the difference ofin diets between the poor and the affluent. Extensive research suggested that the limited food skills leads to the nutrition-poor dietary of the poor. However, the reality is more likely to be thereat there is no remarkable difference ofbetween the food knowledge betweenof the poor and the affluent, and the determinant of food security is the food price. I read a passage on the difference in diets between the poor and the affluent. Extensive research suggested that limited food skills leads to the nutrition-poor dietary of the poor. However, the reality is more likely to be that there is no remarkable difference between the food knowledge of the poor and the affluent, and the determinant of food security is the food price.

I would say 'difference in' would be the more normal expression. No 'the' in front of 'limited food skills' it is not a specific 'limited food skills' that you are drawing attention to. Must a space after a full-stop and comma. Use 'that' after 'the reality is more likely to be' to introduce the next clause.

I read a passage on the difference of diets between the poor and the affluent. Extensive research suggested that the limited food skills leads to the nutrition-poor dietary of the poor. However, the reality is more likely to be theat there are no remarkable difference of food knowledge between the poor and the affluent and the determinant of food security is the food price. I read a passage on the difference of diets between the poor and the affluent. Extensive research suggested that limited food skills lead to the nutrition-poor diet of the poor. However, the reality is more likely to be that there are no remarkable difference of food knowledge between the poor and the affluent and the determinant of food security is the food price.