July 22, 2023
The section begins by defining multiplication as an abbreviation of addition. Then the book introduces the commutative law, that states that in a multiplication, the order of the factors doesn't matter: a x b is equal to b x a. And this is eventually extended to three or more numbers. Also, take into account that these numbers must be integers. They could be negative numbers, positive numbers or zero, but they have to be integers, because only then we are able to define multiplication in the way we are doing it, which is the previously mentioned abbreviation of addition. After we are introduced to the commutative law and after it is extended to three or more terms or numbers, then we are introduced to the associative law, which states that the multiplication of, say, three quantities, is equal to the multiplication of the product of the first two quantites and the third one. Or, alternatively, the multiplication of the first quantity and the product of the two following quantities. This allows us to write a given multiplication of three or more terms in various ways and combined with the commutative law, describes multiplication almost completely. To completely describe multiplication we need to define the distributive property of multiplication, which links multiplication to addition.
Thanks in advance!
The section begins by defining multiplication as an abbreviation of addition.
Then the book introduces the commutative law, that states that in a multiplication, the order of the factors doesn't matter: a x b is equal tothe same as b x a.
Since you're talking about multiplication in general, no need for the "a" before multiplication
And this is eventuallycan be extended to three or more numbers.
Also, we have to take into account that these numbers must be integers.
Your original sentence makes it sound like you're talking to the reader that they have to "take (this) into account," which is fine in a textbook which is directly teaching the reader something, but this is an explanation of the content in the book.
They could be negative numbers, positive numbers, or zero, but they have to be integers, because only then we arare we able to define multiplication in the way we are doing it, which is the previously mentioned abbreviation of addition.
After we are introduced to the commutative law and after it is extended to three or more terms or numbers, then we are then introduced to the associative law, which states that the multiplication of, say, three quantities, is equal to the multiplication of the product of the first two quantities and the third one.
Not wrong, but "we are then" makes the phrases seem slightly more individual and discrete compared to "then we are".
Or, alternatively, the multiplication of the first quantity and the product of the two following quantities.
This allows us to write a given multiplication equation of three or more terms/factors in various ways and combined with the commutative law, describes multiplication almost completely.
Generally the numbers to be multiplied are called factors.
To completely describe multiplication we need to define the distributive property of multiplication, which links multiplication to addition.
Thanks in advance!
Explaining my book's section on multiplication.
The section begins by defining multiplication as an abbreviation of addition.
Then the book introduces the commutative law, that states that in a multiplication, the order of the factors doesn't matter: a x b is equal to b x a.
And this is eventually extended to three or more numbers.
Also, take into account that these numbers must be integers.
They could be negative numbers, positive numbers or zero, but they have to be integers, because only then we arare we able to define multiplication in the way we are doing it, which is the previously mentioned abbreviation of addition.
After we are introduced to the commutative law and after it is extended to three or more terms or numbers, then we are introduced to the associative law, which. This states that the multiplication of, say, three quantities, is equal to the multiplication of the product of the first two quantites and the third one.
I suggest you break up a very long sentence
Or, alternatively, the multiplication of the first quantity and the product of the two following quantities.
This allows us to write a given multiplication of three or more terms in various ways and combined with the commutative law, describes multiplication almost completely.
To completely describe multiplication, we need to define the distributive property of multiplication, which links multiplication to addition.
Thanks in advance!
Explaining my book's section on multiplication. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
The section begins by defining multiplication as an abbreviation of addition. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
Then the book introduces the commutative law, that states that in a multiplication, the order of the factors doesn't matter: a x b is equal to b x a. This sentence has been marked as perfect! Then the book introduces the commutative law, that states that in Since you're talking about multiplication in general, no need for the "a" before multiplication |
And this is eventually extended to three or more numbers. This sentence has been marked as perfect! And this |
Also, take into account that these numbers must be integers. This sentence has been marked as perfect! Also, we have to take into account that these numbers must be integers. Your original sentence makes it sound like you're talking to the reader that they have to "take (this) into account," which is fine in a textbook which is directly teaching the reader something, but this is an explanation of the content in the book. |
They could be negative numbers, positive numbers or zero, but they have to be integers, because only then we are able to define multiplication in the way we are doing it, which is the previously mentioned abbreviation of addition. They could be negative numbers, positive numbers or zero, but they have to be integers, because only then They could be negative numbers, positive numbers, or zero, but they have to be integers, because only then |
After we are introduced to the commutative law and after it is extended to three or more terms or numbers, then we are introduced to the associative law, which states that the multiplication of, say, three quantities, is equal to the multiplication of the product of the first two quantites and the third one. After we are introduced to the commutative law and after it is extended to three or more terms or numbers, then we are introduced to the associative law I suggest you break up a very long sentence After we are introduced to the commutative law and after it is extended to three or more terms or numbers, Not wrong, but "we are then" makes the phrases seem slightly more individual and discrete compared to "then we are". |
Or, alternatively, the multiplication of the first quantity and the product of the two following quantities. Or This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
This allows us to write a given multiplication of three or more terms in various ways and combined with the commutative law, describes multiplication almost completely. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This allows us to write a given multiplication equation of three or more terms/factors in various ways and combined with the commutative law, describes multiplication almost completely. Generally the numbers to be multiplied are called factors. |
To completely describe multiplication we need to define the distributive property of multiplication, which links multiplication to addition. To completely describe multiplication, we need to define the distributive property of multiplication This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
Thanks in advance! This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium