I saw a video about this topic on TED tTalks.

"TED Talks" is a formal name for an organization

The idea certainly sounds like something too unrealistic to believe and you would think that it should not be that easy to achieve, but the presenter, Ray Kurzweil, showed some convincing graphs for those skeptics.

The fact that artificial intelligence hads been evolving at an accelerated pace for decades, especially in recent years.

I work in the health care industry, and they have been pushing out messages like “We will never give up toward achieving a better well-being for every people all over the world”, or “We will never disappoint patients who are wainting for the solutions”.

But in reality, I wasam not personally ready to answer the desire to live forever, as something an individual can ever request.

I am not sure if the healthcare industry itself has somehas a clear view on this.

Does that make sense if someone say ms, “iIt is a natural and fundamental thing for a human being to wish he/sthat they could live forever.

You can see that in those historical examples”?"?

It might be controversial in the furthear future generally, but for those a few people who have superimmense political power or an extra-hugmassive financial advantages, it wouldmight not take so long to fachave this options.

Esvcape Velocity Longevity

I saw a video about this topic on TED talks.

More than one 'talk'.

The idea certainly sounds like something too unrealistic to believe, and you would think it should not be that easy to achieve, but the presenter, Ray Kurzweil, showed some convincing graphs for thosgraphs that might convince skceptics.

The fact that artificial intelligence had been evolving at an accerated pace for decades, especially in recent years.

Correct sentence but not sure what it has to do with the topic of living forever.

I work in the health care industry, and they have been pushing out messages like “We will never give up on achieving better well-being for every people all over the world”, o.” Or “We will never disappoint patients who are wainting for the solutions”.”

'The healthcare industry' it is a specific thing. You don't need the 'every' in front of people, 'all over the world' implies it.

But in reality, I wasam not personally ready to answer the desire tobelieve that liveing forever, a is something an individual can ever request.

This work seems to be mostly in the present tense so I have changed 'was' to 'am'. Changed the rest of sentence to make to flow better and think 'believe' sounds better than 'answer'. You don't really request a desire so I have removed desire.

I am not sure the healthcare industry itself has someany clear views on this.

Does that make sense if someone says m, “it is a natural and fundamental thing for a human being to wish he/sthey could live forever.?

You need to say what is 'natural and fundamental' or you can say 'It is natural and fundamental' without the 'a'. If you do not know the sex of the person you can replace he/she with 'they'.

YAnd that you can see that in those historical examples”?

I've rewritten the last two sentences in indirect speech.

It might be controversial in the furthear future generally, but for those a few people who have supergreat deal of political power or an extra-hugmassive financial advantages, it would might not take so long to facecall for this options.

'far future' is more common term. 'super' is quite a slangy way of saying it.