megu's avatar
megu

Oct. 4, 2023

0
Electronic books have several positive benefits

Certainly, both electronic books and paper books have several positive benefits, but electronic books have more benefits than paper books. There are some reasons why electronic books are better than paper books. Firstly, electronic books are lighter than paper books so people can carry its conveniently and people can buy books wherever they are. In addition, electronic books has become widespread so there are many books that people can read. Secondly, electronic books can read on the smartphones. These days, almost all people have their own smartphones so people don’t need to buy another device to read electronic books. Also, electronic books can write notes and can remove them. Finally, electronic books can give positive influence on the environment. Electronic books can reduce paper consumption. As a result, it can reduce garbages. For these reasons mentioned above, the advantages of electronic books overweighted the downsides. Surely, paper books have the own advantages but people need o shifting to use electronic books.

Corrections (2)
Correction Settings
Choose how corrections are organized

Only show inserted text
Word-level diffs are planned for a future update.

megu's avatar
megu

Oct. 5, 2023

0
ondaluminosa's avatar
ondaluminosa

Oct. 5, 2023

0

Thank you for your corrections! Your explanations were clear and understandable :)

There are some reasons why electronic books are better than paper books.

Electronic books can reduce paper consumption.

megu's avatar
megu

Oct. 5, 2023

0

Electronic books have several positive benefits


Electronic books have several positivemany benefits Electronic books have many benefits

Benefits are inherently positive.

Certainly, both electronic books and paper books have several positive benefits, but electronic books have more benefits than paper books.


Certainly, both electronic books and paper books have several positivemany benefits, but electronic books have more benefits than paper books. Certainly, both electronic books and paper books have many benefits, but electronic books have more benefits than paper books.

I think "many" better suits your usage here; "several" makes it sound more like you're about to list what these "several benefits" are, whereas here you seem to be going for something more general for this introductory sentence.

Certainly,While both electronic books and paper books have several positive benefits, buttheir advantages, electronic books have more benefits than paper books. While both electronic books and paper books have their advantages, electronic books have more benefits than paper books.

Your sentence is grammatically correct, but a native speaker would probably not phrase it this way, because starting a sentence with "certainly" sounds very formal and a little old-fashioned. Instead, it sounds more natural to restructure the sentence to start with "while". You could also use "however", but you'd need to use two separate sentences, for example: "Both electronic books and paper books have their advantages. However, electronic books have more benefits than paper books."

There are some reasons why electronic books are better than paper books.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

ThHere are some reasons why electronic books are better than paper books. Here are some reasons why electronic books are better than paper books.

Firstly, electronic books are lighter than paper books so people can carry its conveniently and people can buy books wherever they are.


Firstly, electronic books are lighter than paper books, so people can carry itsthem conveniently and people can buy booksbuy them wherever they are. Firstly, electronic books are lighter than paper books, so people can carry them conveniently and buy them wherever they are.

Some things: 1. When "so" is used to connect two independent clauses showing a cause-and-effect relationship (in that order), it is generally considered appropriate to add a comma. "X so Y" without a comma is used in, for example, "I came so that you wouldn't be lonely." Notice that this is a different kind of usage. 2. The antecedent is "electronic books," so "its [sic]" is not appropriate. Be aware of pronoun-antecedent agreement. 3. Because "people can buy books wherever they are" is an independent clause, it would generally be considered appropriate to add a comma before the preceding "and." However, in this case, I think just removing the "people" improves the flow of the sentence.

Firstly, electronic books are lighter than paper books, so people can carry itsthem conveniently and p. People can buy new electronic books wherever they are. Firstly, electronic books are lighter than paper books, so people can carry them conveniently. People can buy new electronic books wherever they are.

There are two arguments here so for clarity it's best to split this sentence in two.

In addition, electronic books has become widespread so there are many books that people can read.


In addition, electronic books has become widespread, so there are many books that people can read electronically. In addition, electronic books has become widespread, so there are many books that people can read electronically.

In addition, electronic books hasve become widespread, so there are many books that people can readtitles available. In addition, electronic books have become widespread, so there are many titles available.

This is a better-sounding structure that avoids using the word "books" twice in the sentence.

Secondly, electronic books can read on the smartphones.


Secondly, electronic books can be read on the smartphones. Secondly, electronic books can be read on smartphones.

Passive voice constructions are formed with a be verb + past participle. "Smartphones" does not take a definite article because you are not talking about some specific set of smartphones, you are just talking about them in general.

Secondly, electronic books can be read on the smartphones. Secondly, electronic books can be read on smartphones.

These days, almost all people have their own smartphones so people don’t need to buy another device to read electronic books.


These days, almost all peopleveryone haves their own smartphones, so people don’t need to buy another device to read electronic books. These days, almost everyone has their own smartphone, so people don’t need to buy another device to read electronic books.

These days, almost all people have their own smartphones, so peoplethey don’t need to buy another device to read electronic books. These days, almost all people own smartphones, so they don’t need to buy another device to read electronic books.

Your original sentence is not incorrect, but this is a more concise way of making the same point.

Also, electronic books can write notes and can remove them.


Also, with electronic books can write notes, you can easily andd cand remove themnotes. Also, with electronic books, you can easily add and remove notes.

1. Electronic books are not the things adding and removing notes, so that cannot be the subject. 2. "can X and can Y" are usually more fluently expressed as "can X and Y" 3. Stylistically, I consider "add" to better mirror "remove" than does "write" (you could, for instance, say "write and erase") 4. You can add and remove notes with paper books as well, it's just more difficult.

Also, electronic books can write notes and can remove themyou can write or remove notes in electronic books. Also, you can write or remove notes in electronic books.

Finally, electronic books can give positive influence on the environment.


Finally, electronic books can givhave a more positive influence on the environment. Finally, electronic books can have a more positive influence on the environment.

You "have an influence" as opposed to "giving influence."

Finally, electronic books can givehave a positive influence on the environment. Finally, electronic books can have a positive influence on the environment.

Electronic books can reduce paper consumption.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

As a result, it can reduce garbages.


As a result, ithey can reduce garbages. As a result, they can reduce garbage.

Pronoun antecedent agreement Garbage is a mass noun.

As a result, ithis can reduce garbageslevels of waste. As a result, this can reduce levels of waste.

"Waste" or "refuse" is more formal than "garbage" and sounds better in a written context.

For these reasons mentioned above, the advantages of electronic books overweighted the downsides.


For these reasons mentioned above, the advantages of electronic books overutweighted the downsides. For these reasons mentioned above, the advantages of electronic books outweigh the downsides.

"Overweight" is an adjective meaning fat

For these reasons mentioned above, the advantages of electronic books overutweighted the downsides. For the reasons mentioned above, the advantages of electronic books outweigh the downsides.

Surely, paper books have the own advantages but people need o shifting to use electronic books.


SureUndoubtedly, paper books have their own advantages, but people need to shifting to usereading electronic books. Undoubtedly, paper books have their own advantages, but people need to shift to reading electronic books.

Surely -> undoubtedly usage Inappropriate use of the definite article Comma before coordinating conjunction connecting independent clauses "Need to shift to using," not "Need to shifting to use"

Surely,While paper books have the ownir advantages but, people need to shifting to useing electronic books. While paper books have their advantages, people need to shift to using electronic books.

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium