Is Facebook makeing people happy? Is Facebook making people happy?

IDoes Facebook mMake pPeople hHappy? Does Facebook Make People Happy?

"Is" is a to-be verb, like ある. "Does" is to actively do, like してる. In English, the words making up a title should be capitalized except for words such as a, for, so, etc.

I just met someone in the class. I just met someone in class.

How manyThis is not the first times I've said that I don't have itone. This is not the first time I've said I don't have one.

Phrasing a bit awkward.

How many times have I said that I don't have it.? How many times have I said that I don't have it?

"Have" is needed here to form the present perfect tense.

Some people are addicted to typeposting stories about their daily lives ion Facebook. Some people are addicted to posting stories about their daily lives on Facebook.

Some people are addicted to typeing stories about their daily lives ion Facebook. Some people are addicted to typing stories about their daily lives on Facebook.

Addict is a noun, addicted is an adjective. Since "are" is used earlier in the sentence, "to type" needs to be "typing." (Some people are to type vs. Some people are typing) "Some people are addicts, typing stories about their daily lives on Facebook," could also work here depending on if you wanted to say the people are addicts instead.

There is no hesitation to post their families' faces and private pictures. There is no hesitation to post their families' faces and private pictures.

Alt: There is no hesitation to post their families' faces, as well as private pictures.

In fact, they areseem really satisfied with it. In fact, they seem really satisfied with it.

Why does this phenomenon occur in modern society in the world? Why does this phenomenon occur in modern society?

A bit repetitive, just modern society OR the world is fine.

Why does this phenomenon occur in modern society in the world? Why does this phenomenon occur in modern society?

Adding "in the world" isn't necessary and sounds somewhat confusing.

When they show off their deluxe and gorgeous honeymoon pictures in a public space, they would bare under the illusion and might thinkthat they are celebrities. When they show off their gorgeous honeymoon pictures in a public space, they are under the illusion that they are celebrities.

I get what you're trying to say, but people don't really describe honeymoon with deluxe. "Luxurious" is a better word choice.

When they show off their deluxe and gorgeous honeymoon pictures in a public, they wouldmay be under the illusion and might thinkthat they are celebrities. When they show off their deluxe and gorgeous honeymoon pictures in public, they may be under the illusion that they are celebrities.

"Public" doesn't need "a" in this instance. If you were describing a public bath or a public bus, then using a before public is appropriate. "Would" as you have used it carries a high degree of certainty with it, "may" is the better choice here as you are supposing why they might be posting photos. In order to be "under the illusion," you need to say what they are under the illusion of, in this case being celebrities.

SThe scary thing is that, some robberies broke houses because owners' of housetook place because the victims showed too much information ofabout their houses go through SNS without any thought ofposts. They were posting without thinking of the risks. The scary thing is, some robberies took place because the victims showed too much information about their houses through SNS posts. They were posting without thinking of the risks.

Too much info going on, making it a run-on sentence. I separated it into two.

SThe scary thing is that some robberies brokes have broken into houses because owners' of housef the owners showeding too much information of their houses go throughn SNS without any thought of the risks. The scary thing is that some robbers have broken into houses because of the owners showing too much information on SNS without any thought of the risks.

Robberies are when theft has taken place, robbers are people who commit theft. I'm using present perfect tense again to describe an event that has and continues to happen for "robbers have broken." Since the topic of the sentence is houses, you don't need to specify what the owners own or what the information is about as it is implied by the rest of the sentence.

In the contrast, my father and younger brother are concentraboth committed to hidestaying private. In contrast, my father and younger brother are both committed to staying private.

In the contrast, my father and younger brother are concentrate to hided on being private. In contrast, my father and younger brother are concentrated on being private.

I think a more natural sentence would be, "In contrast, my father and younger brother are focused on privacy." However, the wording you've chosen works well and conveys the same point.

For example, my father really doesn't want to invite anyone into his house except for our relatives in order to conceal inside of the house. For example, my father doesn't invite anyone to his house except for our relatives.

The previous sentence just talked about your father's commitment to staying private, so "in order to conceal inside of the house" is redundant.

For example, my father really doesn't want to invite anyone inside his house, except our relatives, in order to conceal the inside of the house. For example, my father really doesn't want to invite anyone inside his house, except our relatives, in order to conceal the inside of the house.

When my brother goes out from the house, he will, he checks if anyone walk in front of the houseis nearby. When my brother goes out, he checks if anyone is nearby.

When my brother go out from the house, he willleaves, he checks if anyone walks in front of the house. When my brother leaves, he checks if anyone walks in front of the house.

In English we try to avoid repetition where possible. While "When my brother leaves the house," is grammatically correct, stylistically it is a little clunky. "When my brother leaves," is still correct and is more natural.

In case,f there are people around there, he will waits until they will disappear before leaving the house. If there are, he waits until they disappear before leaving the house.

In case, there are people around there, he will wait until they will disappear. In case there are people around there, he will wait until they disappear.

That said, I think thatey are too much careful andbeing too careful and their behavior are a little unusual. That said, I think they are being too careful and their behavior are a little unusual.

I think that they are too much careful and unusual. I think that they are too careful and unusual.

"Too" already carries the meaning of more or much, so "much" isn't necessary here.