Let’s say person A work ins for the government and person B work ins for a private company, i. If the two of them do the same work, person A get a higher salary than person B, i. If person B wants to get the same salary as person A, he or sher needs to do more work than person A, but i. But that doesn’t mean working infor the government is rich or somethingwill make you rich, it only means that working infor the government is relatively better than working inbetter paid, relative to private companies. Let’s say person A works for the government and person B works for a private company. If the two of them do the same work, person A get a higher salary than person B. If person B wants to get the same salary as person A, he or she needs to do more work than person A. But that doesn’t mean working for the government will make you rich, it only means that working for the government is better paid, relative to private companies.

- Normally we work 'for' things, instead of 'in' them. - Prefer shorter complete sentences to a long run-on one with lots of commas. Especially when constructing an argument, as it makes each point clearer. -

Let’s say person A work ins for the government and person B work ins for a private company, if the two. If both of them do the same work, person A gets a higher salary than person B, i. If person B wants to get the same salary as person A, he or sher needs to do more work than person A, but it doesn’t mean you're rich working infor the government is rich or something, it only means working infor the government is relatively better than working infor private companies. Let’s say person A works for the government and person B works for a private company. If both of them do the same work, person A gets a higher salary than person B. If person B wants to get the same salary as person A, he or she needs to do more work than person A, but it doesn’t mean you're rich working for the government or something, it only means working for the government is relatively better than working for private companies.

Let’s saySuppose person A work ins for the government and person B work ins for a private company, if t. The two of them do the same work, but person A get a higher salary than person B, i. If person B wants to getbe paid the same salary as person A, the or hery needs to do more work than person A, but ithat doesn’t mean working infor the government is rich or somethingpays well, it only means working infor the government is relatively better than working infor private companies. Suppose person A works for the government and person B works for a private company. The two of them do the same work, but person A get a higher salary than person B. If person B wants to be paid the same salary as person A, they need to do more work than person A, but that doesn’t mean working for the government pays well, it only means working for the government is relatively better than working for private companies.

Generally speaking, as ordinary government employees in China, they are able to live theircomfortable lives without working stoo hard, but they are not considered rich. Generally speaking, ordinary government employees in China are able to live comfortable lives without working too hard, but they are not considered rich.

I think "comfortable" is important here. It makes it clear that government jobs pay well enough to live off; but they won't make you rich.

Generally speaking, as ordinary government employees in China, they are able to live their lives without working aso hard, but they are not considered rich. Generally speaking, as ordinary government employees in China, they are able to live their lives without working as hard, but they are not considered rich.

Generally speaking, as ordinary government employees in China, they are able to live their lives without working sovery hard, but they are not considered rich. Generally speaking, as ordinary government employees in China, they are able to live their lives without working very hard, but they are not considered rich.