July 16, 2021
Differences of turkish legal system
The legal system is the rules applied in a country at a certain time. Different legal systems around the world have emerged according to their priorities and principles. These are divided into common law and civil law.
The legal rules applying within the borders of Turkish republic are called the “Turkish legal system”. In general, Turkish legal system is taken place in the scope of civil law. Turkish law system consists of two main parts as public law and private law. Unlike common law, the rules of law are written in codes and constitutions. Court decisions are only an supplementary source of law, they are not the basis for the decision.
The principle of separation of powers is valid in Turkey. The legislature is carried out by the Turkish Grand National Assembly, the executive is carried out by the president and ministers, and the judiciary is carried out by independent courts.
With the election in 2017, the parliamentary system was replaced by the presidential system. The powers of the President increased and he became the head of the executive. For this reason, unlike the parliamentary system, the prime minister no longer takes part in the executive. However, the presidential system in the Turkish legal system is slightly different from the presidential system in America. In Turkey, the president can dissolve the parliament. However, in the United States, the parliament can impeach the president and dismiss him.
On the other hand, unlike the presidential system in the USA, there is no senate in Turkey that oversees the president. Another important distinction is the strictness of the separation of powers. The presidential system in the USA the executive cannot interfere in the legislation. In extraordinary circumstances, the president can enact laws. However, this must be approved by the Senate. On the other hand, in Turkey president can issue a decree, whenever he wants. As there is no senate in Turkey, these decrees cannot be rejected. In this respect, legal security is in danger here.
A two-thirds majority of the Senate is required to ratify International Treaties in the United States. But the situation is different in Turkey. According to Article 90 of the Constitution, some international treaties are signed with the direct approval of the president, while others are signed with the approval of the absolute majority of the parliament.
Differences of tin the Turkish legal system
The legal system is the rules applied in a country at a certain time.
Different legal systems around the world have emerged according to their priorities and principles.
These are divided into common law and civil law.
The legal rules applying within the borders of Turkish republic are called the “Turkish legal system”.
In general, the Turkish legal system is taken place in the scope of civil law.
This is grammatically correct, but I'm not 100% sure what you mean.
The Turkish law system consists of two main parts as: public law and private law.
Unlike common law, the rules of law are written in codes and constitutions.
Court decisions are only an supplementary source of existing law,s; they are not the basis for the decisiondon't replace them.
The principle of separation of powers is valid in Turkey.
The legislature is carried out by the Turkish Grand National Assembly, the executive is carried out by the president and ministers, and the judiciary is carried out by independent courts.
WithAfter the election in 2017, the parliamentary system was replaced by the presidential system.
The powers of the President increased and he became the head of the executive branch.
For this reason, unlike the parliamentary system, the prime minister no longer takes part in the executive processes.
However, the presidential system in the Turkish legal system is slightly different from the presidential system in America.
In Turkey, the president can dissolve the parliament.
However, in the United States, the parliamentCongress can impeach the president and dismiss him.
On the other hand, unlike the presidential system in the USA, there is no senate in Turkey that oversees the president.
Another important distinction is the strictness of the separation of powers.
TAccording to the presidential system in the USA, the executive power cannot interfere in the legislation.
In extraordinary circumstances, the president can enact laws.
However, this must be approved by the Senate.
On the other hand, in Turkey president can issue a decree, whenever he wants.
As there is no senate in Turkey, these decrees cannot be rejected.
In this respect, legal security is in danger here.
A two-thirds majority of the Senate is required to ratify Iinternational Ttreaties in the United States.
But the situation is different in Turkey.
According to Article 90 of the Constitution, some international treaties are signed with the direct approval of the president, while others are signed with the approval of the absolute majority of the parliament.
July 18, 2021
Thank you so much :))))
|
Differences of turkish legal system Differences |
|
The legal system is the rules applied in a country at a certain time. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Different legal systems around the world have emerged according to their priorities and principles. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
These are divided into common law and civil law. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The legal rules applying within the borders of Turkish republic are called the “Turkish legal system”. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
In general, Turkish legal system is taken place in the scope of civil law. In general, the Turkish legal system is taken place in the scope of civil law. This is grammatically correct, but I'm not 100% sure what you mean. |
|
Turkish law system consists of two main parts as public law and private law. The Turkish law system consists of two main parts |
|
Unlike common law, the rules of law are written in codes and constitutions. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Court decisions are only an supplementary source of law, they are not the basis for the decision. Court decisions |
|
The principle of separation of powers is valid in Turkey. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The legislature is carried out by the Turkish Grand National Assembly, the executive is carried out by the president and ministers, and the judiciary is carried out by independent courts. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
With the election in 2017, the parliamentary system was replaced by the presidential system.
|
|
The powers of the President increased and he became the head of the executive. The powers of the President increased and he became the head of the executive branch. |
|
For this reason, unlike the parliamentary system, the prime minister no longer takes part in the executive. For this reason, unlike the parliamentary system, the prime minister no longer takes part in the executive processes. |
|
However, the presidential system in the Turkish legal system is slightly different from the presidential system in America. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
In Turkey, the president can dissolve the parliament. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
However, in the United States, the parliament can impeach the president and dismiss him. However, in the United States, |
|
On the other hand, unlike the presidential system in the USA, there is no senate in Turkey that oversees the president. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Another important distinction is the strictness of the separation of powers. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The presidential system in the USA the executive cannot interfere in the legislation.
|
|
In extraordinary circumstances, the president can enact laws. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
However, this must be approved by the Senate. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
On the other hand, in Turkey president can issue a decree, whenever he wants. On the other hand, in Turkey president can issue a decree |
|
As there is no senate in Turkey, these decrees cannot be rejected. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
In this respect, legal security is in danger here. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
A two-thirds majority of the Senate is required to ratify International Treaties in the United States. A two-thirds majority of the Senate is required to ratify |
|
But the situation is different in Turkey. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
According to Article 90 of the Constitution, some international treaties are signed with the direct approval of the president, while others are signed with the approval of the absolute majority of the parliament. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium