July 23, 2021
Diary
I read an article today about the use of knowledge graph in note taking. It's interesting that people often refer to library classification methods when referring to labeling of notes. Although I've studied library classification of information organization, I don't think this method is suitable for personal notes at all. Because what I am most interested in is actually the breakdown of some fields, which is often not covered by the library taxonomy. For example, blockchain. The Chinese library taxonomy would put it under "e-commerce - payment methods - research". But "e-commerce" and "payment methods" are not what I'm interested in. I want to learn more about blockchain applications, such as the application of NFT in community and digital art, the pollution caused by the minting, and so on. So "blockchain, NFT, community, digital art, environmental protection" would be better labels for me.
Unfortunately, my school has introduced knowledge graph but only at the theoretical level, not in application. And the method described in the article I read today is too cumbersome: in order to easily see the relationship between two notes in the knowledge graph, a new file needs to be created as a bridge when referencing a paragraph. If you need to quote many paragraphs in a note, you need to create so many new files. This will bring great chaos!
Diary
I read an article today about the use of knowledge graphs in note taking.
It's interesting that people often refer to library classification methods when referrdiscussing tohe labeling of notes.
'Discussing' sounds a bit better here, so you can avoid using 'refer' too much.
Although I've studied library classification ofand information organization, I don't think this method is suitable for personal notes at all.
'Library classification of information organization' sounds very long and puzzling.
You could also say 'library classification as a way to organize information'?
Because what I am most interested in is actually the breakdown of some fieldshow some fields are broken down, which is often not covered by the library taxonomy.
I understand this but 'breakdown of some fields' sounds a bit confusing.
For example, blockchain.
The Chinese library taxonomy would put it under "e-commerce - payment methods - research".
But "e-commerce" and "payment methods" are not what I'm interested in.
I want to learn more about blockchain applications, such as the application of NFTs in community and digital art, the pollution caused by the minting, and so on.
So "blockchain, NFT, community, digital art, environmental protection" would be better labels for me.
Unfortunately, my school has introduced knowledge graphs, but only at the theoretical level, not in application.
And the method described in the article I read today is too cumbersome: in order to easily see the relationship between two notes in the knowledge graph, a new file needs to be created as a bridge when referencing a paragraph.
If you need to quote many paragraphs in a single note, you need to create so many new files.
This will bring great chaos!
Feedback
It was interesting to read about how libraries organize their resources. But I'm still not entirely sure what a knowledge graph is?
July 24, 2021
"A knowledge graph is a directed labeled graph in which the labels have well-defined meanings. "
For me, it's simply about turning knowledge into visual dotted line diagrams.
Thanks :)
|
Diary This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
I read an article today about the use of knowledge graph in note taking. I read an article today about the use of knowledge graphs in note taking. |
|
It's interesting that people often refer to library classification methods when referring to labeling of notes. It's interesting that people often refer to library classification methods when 'Discussing' sounds a bit better here, so you can avoid using 'refer' too much. |
|
Although I've studied library classification of information organization, I don't think this method is suitable for personal notes at all. Although I've studied library classification 'Library classification of information organization' sounds very long and puzzling. You could also say 'library classification as a way to organize information'? |
|
Because what I am most interested in is actually the breakdown of some fields, which is often not covered by the library taxonomy. Because what I am most interested in is actually I understand this but 'breakdown of some fields' sounds a bit confusing. |
|
For example, blockchain. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The Chinese library taxonomy would put it under "e-commerce - payment methods - research". This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
But "e-commerce" and "payment methods" are not what I'm interested in. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
I want to learn more about blockchain applications, such as the application of NFT in community and digital art, the pollution caused by the minting, and so on. I want to learn more about blockchain applications, such as the application of NFTs in community and digital art, the pollution caused by the minting, and so on. |
|
So "blockchain, NFT, community, digital art, environmental protection" would be better labels for me. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Unfortunately, my school has introduced knowledge graph but only at the theoretical level, not in application. Unfortunately, my school has introduced knowledge graphs, but only at the theoretical level, not in application. |
|
And the method described in the article I read today is too cumbersome: in order to easily see the relationship between two notes in the knowledge graph, a new file needs to be created as a bridge when referencing a paragraph. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
If you need to quote many paragraphs in a note, you need to create so many new files. If you need to quote many paragraphs in a single note, you need to create so many new files. |
|
This will bring great chaos! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium