Ma réponse : corrigerz le texte ci-dessous; s’il vous plaît :)

Bien, je pense que quand tusi on choisist d'habiter à la campagne tu écouteras , on entendra le coq/des coqs tous les jours !

écouter = listen to (paying attention to a noise)
entendre = hear (perceiving a noise)

"Quand" expresses general truths ("every time A happens, B automatically follows") so "entendre" would rather be in the present tense, in that case. If you want to go for the future, you should pick a "si"-clause

It's better to use "on" for general statements/truths, although "tu" or "vous" can fulfill this purpose in some oral situations, but in a written text or exam, "on" would definitely be better

Par exemple, pendant nos réunions pour lde travail, ma collègue a un coq et il se réveille tôt.

Pour eux, c'est normal, ils habitent dans leun village.

"dans LE" would mean in a specific village already defined (by a previous sentence or a context). "Le village" as a global, abstract concept (like "la campagne" or "à la ville") doesn't exist.

Si tuon aimes laes grandes villes ou qu'on détestez la vie à la campagne, neil ne faut jamais y déménager à la campagne !

y = there, to the countryside (it avoids repeating "countryside")

Pour moi, ce serait très/trop bruyant, donc, je n'y habite pas à la campagne.

CLa situation décrite sera très intéressante.

Better to specify what you're describing with a noun here

IlLes plaignants veulent que le maire intervienne.

Same thing here

Et, je ne comprends pas (où est) la justice pour, dans cette situation.

Parce que j'imagine que c'est la nature pour ledu coq d'être bruyant et de réveiller les voisins à deux heures du matin.

Noun complements are often introduced using "de" ("of"). "Pour" is widely used in French, but less than in English, especially for building noun complements
"réveiller" depends on "c'est la nature" => DE réveiller

It'd be far better to merge this sentence with the previous one. Technically, you can separate a main clause from a "parce que" one, which often creates some kind of stylistical effect, but in cases where both are tightly connected (semantically), it can look very odd.

Les voisins doivent réalisercomprendre que c'est la faiblesse quand vous habitez dansun inconvénient d'habiter à la campagne.

"réaliser" in the sense of "understanding" is an anglicism. Although it's a well-accepted one, I always prefer suggesting purely French alternatives => comprendre, se rendre compte que, s'apercevoir que, etc
a disadvantage = un inconvénient
"dans la campagne" exists, but it would be more definite, like somewhere deep in the land, in the woods or in the meadows

Pour moiEn ce qui me concerne, j'aurais détesté être réveillé par un coq tous les jours, donc, je choisis habiter dans la citéen ville et je n'ai pas unde ferme.

as for me = en ce qui me concerne (in my case)
"cité" have different meanings, but it has a lot of sociological connotations, especially in France — actually, "une cité" is very often the equivalent of a North American ghetto, i.e. a poor, run-down neighborhood with violence or crime problems. The neutral term for "city" is "ville"
to live in the city = vivre en ville

Et voilà, je dors pour huit heures sans coq le matin !

Duration is expressed with "durant/pendant", or with nothing at all, like in this case, but almost never with "pour"