kailynhuynh96's avatar
kailynhuynh96

Dec. 19, 2024

43
Day 41

Misunderstandings sometimes occur within the communication. While we try to express our opinions, in some cases our opinions can be expressed in a more different way than what we thought. Therefore, when emotions explode while communicating, the conversation can end with a fight, which opposite with original thoughts. When the opponent is agitated, it is hard to lead to a smooth conversation.


Những hiểu lầm thường xảy ra trong khi giao tiếp. Thông thường, khi ta cố gắng truyền đạt ý kiến của mình, có nhiều trường hợp ý kiến được thể hiện theo một hướng khác với điều chúng ta nghĩ. Vì vậy đôi khi cảm xúc dâng trào trong cuộc đối thoại, và cuộc trò chuyện cuối cùng kết thúc bằng một cuộc chiến, trái với ý định ban đầu. Khi đối phương kích động như thế, khó có thể hình thành một cuộc đối thoại suôn sẻ.

Corrections

Day 41

Misunderstandings sometimes occur within theduring communication.

While we try to express our opinions, in some cases our opinions can be expresseunderstood in a more different way thanrombosis what we thought.intended.

Therefore, when emotions explode while communicating, the conversation can end with a fight, which opposite wiin an argument, which was not the intention of the original thoughts.

When the opponent is agitated, it is hard to leadhave to a smoothcalm conversation.

kailynhuynh96's avatar
kailynhuynh96

yesterday

43

Thank you very much for your correction.

Day 41

Misunderstandings can sometimes occur within thhile communicationg.

Using “can” emphasizes the possibility of misunderstandings occurring. “While communicating” is simpler and easier to understand.

While we try to express our opinions in a certain way, in some cases our opinions can be expressed in a morecome across different waly than what we thought.e intended;

“Come across” works better because it specifically refers to the interpretation by the listener. “In a more different way” sounds unnatural, so we should simplify it to “differently.” While “than what we thought” works, “than we intended” flows better!

Ttherefore, when emotions explode while communicating, thea conversation can end with a fight, which is the opposite with original thoughtsof what was intended.

“Therefore” and “however” are special words. When they come at the beginning of a sentence, the last sentence needs to end in a semicolon (;). “Sentence 1; therefore, sentence 2.” “Sentence 1; however, sentence 2.”

When the opponentther person is agitated, it is hard to lead to a smooth conversation.

“Opponent” makes it sound like you were intentionally fighting with the person.

Feedback

Well written! I just made a few changes to add nuance to your writing!

kailynhuynh96's avatar
kailynhuynh96

yesterday

43

Thank you so much for your correction.

Misunderstandings sometimes occur within theduring communication.

Since communication is an action it makes sense to use "during". You could also say "Misunderstandings sometimes occur while communicating."

While we trying to express our opinions, they can, in some cases our opinions can be expressed in a more different way than what we thought, be conveyed differently from what we were thinking.

"Trying" instead of "we try" makes the sentence more concise. If you want to use "in some cases" it sounds more native and fluent if you embed it in the sentence, you could also use "sometimes" if you would like it to be more concise. I suggest using the word "conveyed" so the word expressed is not repeated too much, and also conveyed indicates that the *outcome* is different from what we wanted. Instead of "different way" you could use the adverb "differently", in which case you don't need "more" with it. "From what we were thinking" works better in this context. "Than" is usually used when you compare qualities (i.e better than, larger than), "from" shows the relationship between thoughts and expressed opinions better! Using the continuous present "we were thinking" conveys your idea more clearly than the past tense "we thought" since thinking is an ongoing process that occurs while expressing opinions, and is not a finalised action!

Therefore, when emotions explodeoverwhelm us while communicating, the conversation can end within a fight, which opposite wicontrary to the original thoughtintentions.

Using "overwhelm us" or even saying "when emotions run high while communicating" makes the text sound more formal. "end in a fight" is better than "end with a fight" since using "in" shows that the fight is the *consequence* of the emotional conversation while "with" doesn't usually imply a consequence (i.e. you say a wedding ended with a speech). I think you tried to say "contrary to the original intentions" but let me know if you meant something else!

When the opponent is agitated, it is hard to lead to a smooth conversation.

This sentence is correct! Just a small tip, "opponent" is usually used in the context of debates, if you are talking about normal conversation then it is better to use "the other person", but if you did mean it in the context of a debate then well done.

Feedback

Day 41 woooo!! You're doing great, keep it up! I love the ideas you talk about it's just about refining your writing. You go girl you've got this :D

kailynhuynh96's avatar
kailynhuynh96

yesterday

43

Wow thank you for your correction and your encouragement.

Day 41

Misunderstandings sometimes occur within the communication.

While we try to express our opinions, in some cases our opinions can be expressed in a more different way than what we thought.

Therefore, when emotions explode while communicating, the conversation can end with a fight, which is the opposite withof what we originally thoughts.

Or you could say “which is the opposite of what we originally wanted” which makes more sense.

When the opponent is agitated, it is hard to lead to a smooth conversation.

kailynhuynh96's avatar
kailynhuynh96

yesterday

43

Thank you for your correction.

When the opponent is agitated, it is hard to lead to a smooth conversation.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

When the opponent is agitated, it is hard to lead to a smooth conversation.

This sentence is correct! Just a small tip, "opponent" is usually used in the context of debates, if you are talking about normal conversation then it is better to use "the other person", but if you did mean it in the context of a debate then well done.

When the opponentther person is agitated, it is hard to lead to a smooth conversation.

“Opponent” makes it sound like you were intentionally fighting with the person.

When the opponent is agitated, it is hard to leadhave to a smoothcalm conversation.

Day 41


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Misunderstandings sometimes occur within the communication.


Misunderstandings sometimes occur within the communication.

Misunderstandings sometimes occur within theduring communication.

Since communication is an action it makes sense to use "during". You could also say "Misunderstandings sometimes occur while communicating."

Misunderstandings can sometimes occur within thhile communicationg.

Using “can” emphasizes the possibility of misunderstandings occurring. “While communicating” is simpler and easier to understand.

Misunderstandings sometimes occur within theduring communication.

While we try to express our opinions, in some cases our opinions can be expressed in a more different way than what we thought.


While we try to express our opinions, in some cases our opinions can be expressed in a more different way than what we thought.

While we trying to express our opinions, they can, in some cases our opinions can be expressed in a more different way than what we thought, be conveyed differently from what we were thinking.

"Trying" instead of "we try" makes the sentence more concise. If you want to use "in some cases" it sounds more native and fluent if you embed it in the sentence, you could also use "sometimes" if you would like it to be more concise. I suggest using the word "conveyed" so the word expressed is not repeated too much, and also conveyed indicates that the *outcome* is different from what we wanted. Instead of "different way" you could use the adverb "differently", in which case you don't need "more" with it. "From what we were thinking" works better in this context. "Than" is usually used when you compare qualities (i.e better than, larger than), "from" shows the relationship between thoughts and expressed opinions better! Using the continuous present "we were thinking" conveys your idea more clearly than the past tense "we thought" since thinking is an ongoing process that occurs while expressing opinions, and is not a finalised action!

While we try to express our opinions in a certain way, in some cases our opinions can be expressed in a morecome across different waly than what we thought.e intended;

“Come across” works better because it specifically refers to the interpretation by the listener. “In a more different way” sounds unnatural, so we should simplify it to “differently.” While “than what we thought” works, “than we intended” flows better!

While we try to express our opinions, in some cases our opinions can be expresseunderstood in a more different way thanrombosis what we thought.intended.

Therefore, when emotions explode while communicating, the conversation can end with a fight, which opposite with original thoughts.


Therefore, when emotions explode while communicating, the conversation can end with a fight, which is the opposite withof what we originally thoughts.

Or you could say “which is the opposite of what we originally wanted” which makes more sense.

Therefore, when emotions explodeoverwhelm us while communicating, the conversation can end within a fight, which opposite wicontrary to the original thoughtintentions.

Using "overwhelm us" or even saying "when emotions run high while communicating" makes the text sound more formal. "end in a fight" is better than "end with a fight" since using "in" shows that the fight is the *consequence* of the emotional conversation while "with" doesn't usually imply a consequence (i.e. you say a wedding ended with a speech). I think you tried to say "contrary to the original intentions" but let me know if you meant something else!

Ttherefore, when emotions explode while communicating, thea conversation can end with a fight, which is the opposite with original thoughtsof what was intended.

“Therefore” and “however” are special words. When they come at the beginning of a sentence, the last sentence needs to end in a semicolon (;). “Sentence 1; therefore, sentence 2.” “Sentence 1; however, sentence 2.”

Therefore, when emotions explode while communicating, the conversation can end with a fight, which opposite wiin an argument, which was not the intention of the original thoughts.

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium