Dec. 10, 2024
Day 32
AI in cleaning robots or self-driving cars may make people’s lives more convenient. However, people may lose their current jobs because of AI’s replacement in those jobs. It is also unclear whether who will be responsible for the problems due to AI’s mistakes. For example, if a self-driving car get involved in an accident, ethical and legal conflicts about responsibilities will happen.
Robot dọn dẹp hoặc ô tô tự lái được phát triển sử dụng trí tuệ nhân tạo có thể giúp cuộc sống của mọi người thuận tiện hơn. Tuy nhiên, con người có thể mất việc vì trí tuệ nhân tạo thay thế công việc mà con người đang làm trước đây. Và người chịu trách nhiệm cho vấn đề phát sinh do sự cố trí tuệ nhân tạo không rõ ràng có thể gây ra vấn đề. Ví dụ, nếu một chiếc xe tự lái xảy ra tai nạn, sẽ có tranh cãi về mặt đạo đức và pháp lý về trách nhiệm này.
However, people may lose their current jobs because of AI’s replacement inof those jobs.
It is also unclear whether who will be responsible for the problems due to AI’s mistakes.
whether is only for yes-or-no cases, you don't need it if you say "who"
For example, if a self-driving car gets involved in an accident, ethical and legal conflicts aboutover responsibilities will happeny for the accident will take place.
original is okay, but I think this is closer to what you mean
It is also unclear whether who will be responsible for the problems due to AI’s mistakes.
The word "whether" is normally used when you are presenting multiple options/possibilities. For example, if you wrote "It is also unclear whether somebody will be held responsible or not," it will be fine to use whether since there's more than one option presented: (1) held responsible or (2) not held responsible. In your sentence, there's not multiple possibilities.
Dec. 11, 2024
Thank you for your correction.
|
Day 32 |
|
It is also unclear whether who will be responsible for the problems due to AI’s mistakes. It is also unclear The word "whether" is normally used when you are presenting multiple options/possibilities. For example, if you wrote "It is also unclear whether somebody will be held responsible or not," it will be fine to use whether since there's more than one option presented: (1) held responsible or (2) not held responsible. In your sentence, there's not multiple possibilities. It is also unclear whether is only for yes-or-no cases, you don't need it if you say "who" |
|
For example, if a self-driving car get involved in an accident, ethical and legal conflicts about responsibilities will happen. For example, if a self-driving car gets involved in an accident, ethical and legal conflicts original is okay, but I think this is closer to what you mean |
|
AI in cleaning robots or self-driving cars may make people’s lives more convenient. |
|
However, people may lose their current jobs because of AI’s replacement in those jobs. However, people may lose their current jobs because of AI’s replacement |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium