today
I have to say, Claire and Paul have a great idea. But they all have forgotten a crucial factor, time. As I said, nobody ever got the free time for new students. So, what if they were during the busy time? Should new students look for some guidance like a fly? I definitely confirm it would lose new students positively. Since we must have some tools to replace students, such as a campus guide website. In addition, a new transform student can use the web whenever they need to, and register as a member in a club. In conclusion, when new students get the guide to help them smoothly find out how the new campus works, they would love this new campus for their new school life.
Professor Diaz
This week we will discuss issues faced by secondary school administrators. I'm referring to schools for teenage students. One such issue is students who change schools. Students change schools for many different reasons, the most common being a family move. On the discussion board, I want you to exchange ideas about what schools can do to make the transition to a new school easier for teenagers.
Claire
I think schools should assign new students a fellow student who can help them adjust. The "student buddy" can do things like make sure the new student can find the cafeteria or the right classrooms. For new students, it's a lot easier to ask a fellow student a question rather than ask a teacher or the principal.
Paul
I would require new students to sign up for some school club or activity that meets outside of class. That way, new students would have an easy way to meet other students in a friendly environment. lt would give them a group to immediately identify with.
As I said, nobody ever gothas the free time for new students.
So, what if they were during the busy timebusy?
Who was buys? New students or Claire and Paul?
Should new students look for some guidance like a fly?
I don't really understand this sentence, it sounds like an idiom that was directly translated into English.
I definitely confirm it would lose new students positively.
"net-positive loss of students"? The meaning is not clear.
Since wWe must have some tools to replace students, such as a campus guide website.
In addition, a new transformer student can use the web whenever they need to, and register as a member in a club.
In conclusion, when new students get the guide to help them smoothly find out how the new campus works, they would love this new campus for their new school life.
Meaning is unclear...I would write something like: "In conclusion, once a new student has access to an online campus guide, they would be able to navigate their new campus more smoothly (easily) and fall in love with their new school (OR: integrate into campus life)"
Feedback
What was the original prompt?
Daily Life: Part 13
I have to say, Claire and Paul have a great ideas.
Claire and Paul each came up with an idea, so it's two ideas (plural)
But they all haveboth forgotten a crucial factor, time.
When talking about two people, we'd default to "both"
As I said, nobody ever got thehas free time for new students.
I have
You have
He/She/Nobody has
They've got
So, what if they wereis happens during thea busy time of the school year?
Better to speak more about the situation (this) rather than people (they)
Should new students look for some guidance like a flypeople to guide them, like flies?
Liking studentS to flieS, both should be plural
I definitelycan confirm ithat would cause the school to lose new students positiv, definitely.
It's redundant to have both "definitely" and "positively," better to keep one at the end for a strong emphasis.
Since wWe must have some tools to replacintegrate students, such as a campus guide website.
The original sentence can't stand like this with "since"
Speaking more directly to the point would rather be "integration," or how to smoothly on-board students into their new school
In addition, a new transform student canould use the web whenever they needed to, and register as a member in a club.
Talking about a hypothetical situation: could use
In conclusion, when new students get the guidance to help them smoothly find outlearn how their new campus works, they wouldill love thiseir new campus forand their new school life.
You're phrasing this as a general truth, like a cause and consequence, so we use the present into the future (when they X, they will Y). When I go swimming, I will get wet.
Feedback
Great job
Since we must have some tools to replace students, such as a campus guide website.
The original sentence can't stand like this with "since" Speaking more directly to the point would rather be "integration," or how to smoothly on-board students into their new school
|
In addition, a new transform student can use the web whenever they need to, and register as a member in a club. In addition, a new Talking about a hypothetical situation: could use In addition, a new transf |
In conclusion, when new students get the guide to help them smoothly find out how the new campus works, they would love this new campus for their new school life. In conclusion, when new students get You're phrasing this as a general truth, like a cause and consequence, so we use the present into the future (when they X, they will Y). When I go swimming, I will get wet. In conclusion, when new students get the guide to help them smoothly find out how the new campus works, they would love this new campus for their new school life. Meaning is unclear...I would write something like: "In conclusion, once a new student has access to an online campus guide, they would be able to navigate their new campus more smoothly (easily) and fall in love with their new school (OR: integrate into campus life)" |
I definitely confirm it would lose new students positively. I It's redundant to have both "definitely" and "positively," better to keep one at the end for a strong emphasis. I definitely confirm it would lose new students "net-positive loss of students"? The meaning is not clear. |
Daily Life: Part 13 This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
I have to say, Claire and Paul have a great idea. I have to say, Claire and Paul have Claire and Paul each came up with an idea, so it's two ideas (plural) |
But they all have forgotten a crucial factor, time. But they When talking about two people, we'd default to "both" |
As I said, nobody ever got the free time for new students. As I said, nobody ever I have You have He/She/Nobody has They've got As I said, nobody ever |
So, what if they were during the busy time? So, what if th Better to speak more about the situation (this) rather than people (they) So, what if they were Who was buys? New students or Claire and Paul? |
Should new students look for some guidance like a fly? Should new students look for Liking studentS to flieS, both should be plural Should new students look for some guidance like a fly? I don't really understand this sentence, it sounds like an idiom that was directly translated into English. |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium