Jack's avatar
Jack

Sept. 12, 2022

0
A Grammar Rule

In English, there is a grammar rule: when the subject is the "third person singular", the verbs in the sentences should add an S to the end of them. For example,"he hits me" and "she smiles at him".

Why is there this grammar rule? What is the meaning of it? I have checked this question online many times, but no one can give an ideal answer.

I once asked some native English speakers, they were like "we are used to it", "saying a S is not that difficult" or "if I don't say the S, I often feel something wrong".

My point of view is, this grammar rule doesn't have any practical meaning and it will be dropped soon or later.

Corrections (4)
Correction Settings
Choose how corrections are organized

Only show inserted text
Word-level diffs are planned for a future update.

A Grammar Rule

Why is there this grammar rule?

For example,"he hits me" and "she smiles at him".

Jack's avatar
Jack

Sept. 12, 2022

0

Jack's avatar
Jack

Sept. 12, 2022

0

Jack's avatar
Jack

Sept. 12, 2022

0

A Grammar Rule


A Grammar Rules Grammar Rules

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

In English, there is a grammar rule: when the subject is the "third person singular", the verbs in the sentences should add an S to the end of them.


In English, there is a grammar rule: when the subject is the "third person singular", the verbs in the sentences should add an S to the end of themsuffix. In English, there is a grammar rule: when the subject is the "third person singular", the verbs in the sentences should add an S suffix.

In English, there is a grammar rule: when the subject is the "third person singular", the verbs in the sentences should add an S"s" to the end of them. In English, there is a grammar rule: when the subject is the "third person singular", the verbs in the sentences should add an "s" to the end of them.

When referring to a literal thing you are adding, it's common to write it exactly as it usually appears and put it in double quotes. S would be understood, but it was unexpected, "s" tells you exactly what it is and nothing more.

In English, there is a grammar rule: when the subject is the "third person singular", the verbs in the sentences should add an San "s" should be added to the end of them verb. In English, there is a grammar rule: when the subject is the "third person singular", an "s" should be added to the end of the verb.

I think it's better to use passive form And you should use " " for s.

In English, thereis is a grammar rule: when the subject is the "third person singular", the verbs in the sentences should add an S to the end of them. In English, this is a grammar rule: when the subject is third person singular, the verbs in the sentences should add an S to the end of them.

For example,"he hits me" and "she smiles at him".


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

For example, "he hits me" and "she smiles at him"." For example, "he hits me" and "she smiles at him."

Why is there this grammar rule?


Why is theredoes this grammar rule exist? Why does this grammar rule exist?

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

What is the meaning of it?


What is the meaning of itdoes it mean? What does it mean?

I have checked this question online many times, but no one can give an ideal answer.


I have checked this question online many times, but no one can give an ideal answer. I have checked this question online many times, but no one can give an ideal answer.

"I have asked this question" or "I have checked this issue" are more correct. Technically, you don't check a question, instead you check something that exists, such as the result of asking a question. You could also "check for this question" if you're just seeing if the question has been asked, without specifying you're looking for the answer.

I have checked online for this question online many times, but no one can give an ideal answer. I have checked online for this question many times, but no one can give an ideal answer.

I once asked some native English speakers, they were like "we are used to it", "saying a S is not that difficult" or "if I don't say the S, I often feel something wrong".


I once asked some native English speakers, and they were like "we are used to it", "saying an S is not that difficult" or "if I don't say the S, I often feel like something’s wrong". I once asked some native English speakers and they were like "we are used to it", "saying an S is not that difficult" or "if I don't say the S, I often feel like something’s wrong".

I once asked some native English speakers, and they were like "we are used to it", "saying a S is not that difficult" or "if I don't say the S, I often feel something wrong". I once asked some native English speakers, and they were like "we are used to it", "saying a S is not that difficult" or "if I don't say the S, I often feel something wrong".

You want a conjunction here, because "they were like ..." is a fully separate clause. Without "and" or something similar, it feels strange, or like it's speech (which would be quoted). Instead of a conjunction you could use a semi colon (;) as well.

I once asked some native English speakers, they were like "we are used to it", "saying a S is not that difficult" or "if I don't say the S, I often feel like something is wrong". I once asked some native English speakers, they were like "we are used to it", "saying a S is not that difficult" or "if I don't say the S, I often feel like something is wrong".

I once asked some native English speakers, and they were like, "we a're used to it", "say," "adding an S is not that difficult" or "if I don't say the S, I often feel something wrong".it sounds funny." I once asked some native English speakers and they were like, "we're used to it," "adding an S is not that difficult" or "if I don't say the S, it sounds funny."

My point of view is, this grammar rule doesn't have any practical meaning and it will be dropped soon or later.


My point of view isIn my opinion, this grammar rule doesn't have any practical meaning and it will be dropped sooner or later. In my opinion, this grammar rule doesn't have any practical meaning and it will be dropped sooner or later.

My point of view is, this grammar rule doesn't have any practical meaning and it will be dropped soon or later. My point of view is, this grammar rule doesn't have any practical meaning and it will be dropped soon or later.

"My point of view is that this grammar rule..." or "My point of view: this grammar rule ..." or just "My point of view is this grammar rule ...". The comma here would make sense in speech to indicate a pause, but in writing it ungrammatical.

My point of view is,opinion is that this grammar rule doesn't have any practical meaning whatsoever and it will be dropped sooner or later. My opinion is that this grammar rule doesn't have any practical meaning whatsoever and will be dropped sooner or later.

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium