March 1, 2026
Religion for Atheist
I should type Religion for an Atheist maybe. Because there can be different types. There was a science-based one. But scientist could become a flamen (a woodoo). I don’t mean Science like a cult. I mean science could be a pseudoscience. In addition, so called atheists could go in for astrology, esoteric etc. There is a word Asur in Bhagavad Gita, some dictionary said that means a demon-atheist. I think it’s funny. Should I use a Pure Atheist?
All that doesn’t matter. I don’t care and you don’t take it to heart, too.
I read (listened an audio) Strugatsky brothers’ science fiction novel A Billion Years Before the End of the World, sometimes called Definitely Maybe. Some persons faced irresistible forces. I decided to make short summary. The end.
Religion for Atheists
I should type Religion for an Atheist maybe.
There was a science-based one.
Not a correctness issue, but it's not quite clear what "one" is referring to - I'm guessing religion? In which case it might be clearer to state this.
But a scientist could become a flamen (a wvoodoo).
I had to look up what flamen was - I learned something new! :) Not sure though if you meant to type "voodoo" though? In which case I don't believe a scientist can become one, as it is a practice / religion.
I don’t mean Sscience is like a cult.
I mean science could be a pseudoscience.
In addition, so called atheists could go in for astrology, esoteric knowledge, etc.
"esoteric" on its own is an adjective, and in this context I'm guessing woul dbe used like "esoteric knowledge" or "esoteric wisdom".
There is a word Asur in Bhagavad Gita, some dictionary said that means a demon-atheist.
Should I use a Ppure Aatheist?
Not entirely sure what you mean here, but maybe "should I describe it as pure atheism?" would sound more natural if you are trying to put a name to a type of person / belief system.
I don’t care and you don’t take it to heart, tooeither.
I read (listened to an audio of)
Some personsople faced irresistible forces.
Feedback
Interesting post, well done!
yesterday
Thank you, loafdumpling!
|
Religion for Atheist Religion for Atheists |
|
I should type Religion for an Atheist maybe. I should type Religion for an Atheist maybe. |
|
Because there can be different types. |
|
There was a science-based one. There was a science-based one. Not a correctness issue, but it's not quite clear what "one" is referring to - I'm guessing religion? In which case it might be clearer to state this. |
|
But scientist could become a flamen (a woodoo). But a scientist could become a flamen (a I had to look up what flamen was - I learned something new! :) Not sure though if you meant to type "voodoo" though? In which case I don't believe a scientist can become one, as it is a practice / religion. |
|
I don’t mean Science like a cult. I don’t mean |
|
I mean science could be a pseudoscience. I mean science could be |
|
In addition, so called atheists could go in for astrology, esoteric etc. In addition, so called atheists could go in for astrology, esoteric knowledge, etc. "esoteric" on its own is an adjective, and in this context I'm guessing woul dbe used like "esoteric knowledge" or "esoteric wisdom". |
|
There is a word Asur in Bhagavad Gita, some dictionary said that means a demon-atheist. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
I think it’s funny. |
|
Should I use a Pure Atheist? Should I use a Not entirely sure what you mean here, but maybe "should I describe it as pure atheism?" would sound more natural if you are trying to put a name to a type of person / belief system. |
|
All that doesn’t matter. |
|
I don’t care and you don’t take it to heart, too. I don’t care and |
|
I read (listened an audio) I read (listened to an audio of) |
|
Strugatsky brothers’ science fiction novel A Billion Years Before the End of the World, sometimes called Definitely |
|
Maybe. |
|
Some persons faced irresistible forces. Some pe |
|
I decided to make short summary. |
|
The end. |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium