Sckeptic's avatar
Sckeptic

March 1, 2026

0
Religion for Atheist

I should type Religion for an Atheist maybe. Because there can be different types. There was a science-based one. But scientist could become a flamen (a woodoo). I don’t mean Science like a cult. I mean science could be a pseudoscience. In addition, so called atheists could go in for astrology, esoteric etc. There is a word Asur in Bhagavad Gita, some dictionary said that means a demon-atheist. I think it’s funny. Should I use a Pure Atheist?
All that doesn’t matter. I don’t care and you don’t take it to heart, too.
I read (listened an audio) Strugatsky brothers’ science fiction novel A Billion Years Before the End of the World, sometimes called Definitely Maybe. Some persons faced irresistible forces. I decided to make short summary. The end.

Corrections (1)
Correction Settings
Choose how corrections are organized

Only show inserted text
Word-level diffs are planned for a future update.

There is a word Asur in Bhagavad Gita, some dictionary said that means a demon-atheist.

Sckeptic's avatar
Sckeptic

March 3, 2026

0

Religion for Atheist


Religion for Atheists Religion for Atheists

I should type Religion for an Atheist maybe.


I should type Religion for an Atheist maybe. I should type Religion for an Atheist maybe.

Because there can be different types.


There was a science-based one.


There was a science-based one. There was a science-based one.

Not a correctness issue, but it's not quite clear what "one" is referring to - I'm guessing religion? In which case it might be clearer to state this.

But scientist could become a flamen (a woodoo).


But a scientist could become a flamen (a wvoodoo). But a scientist could become a flamen (a voodoo).

I had to look up what flamen was - I learned something new! :) Not sure though if you meant to type "voodoo" though? In which case I don't believe a scientist can become one, as it is a practice / religion.

I don’t mean Science like a cult.


I don’t mean Sscience is like a cult. I don’t mean science is like a cult.

I mean science could be a pseudoscience.


I mean science could be a pseudoscience. I mean science could be pseudoscience.

In addition, so called atheists could go in for astrology, esoteric etc.


In addition, so called atheists could go in for astrology, esoteric knowledge, etc. In addition, so called atheists could go in for astrology, esoteric knowledge, etc.

"esoteric" on its own is an adjective, and in this context I'm guessing woul dbe used like "esoteric knowledge" or "esoteric wisdom".

There is a word Asur in Bhagavad Gita, some dictionary said that means a demon-atheist.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

I think it’s funny.


Should I use a Pure Atheist?


Should I use a Ppure Aatheist? Should I use a pure atheist?

Not entirely sure what you mean here, but maybe "should I describe it as pure atheism?" would sound more natural if you are trying to put a name to a type of person / belief system.

All that doesn’t matter.


I don’t care and you don’t take it to heart, too.


I don’t care and you don’t take it to heart, tooeither. I don’t care and don’t take it to heart, either.

I read (listened an audio)


I read (listened to an audio of) I read (listened to an audio of)

Strugatsky brothers’ science fiction novel A Billion Years Before the End of the World, sometimes called Definitely


Maybe.


Some persons faced irresistible forces.


Some personsople faced irresistible forces. Some people faced irresistible forces.

I decided to make short summary.


The end.


You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium