"AThe "[that's] one small step for a[a] man, aone giant leap for mankind" story is hard to believe now, because it's still very difficult for men and women to go to the moon, even with the help of excellent AI. The "[that's] one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind" story is hard to believe now, because it's still very difficult for men and women to go to the moon, even with the help of excellent AI.

Corrected the quote based on my memory, and a quick Wikipedia check.

The "A small step for a man, a giant leap for mankind" story is hard to believe now because it's still very difficult for men and women to go to the moon, even with the help of excellent AI. The "A small step for a man, a giant leap for mankind" story is hard to believe now because it's still very difficult for men and women to go to the moon, even with the help of excellent AI.

"AThe "a small step for a man, a giant leap for mankind" story is hard to believe now because it's still very difficult for men and women to go to the moon, even with the help of excellent AI. The "a small step for a man, a giant leap for mankind" story is hard to believe now because it's still very difficult for men and women to go to the moon, even with the help of excellent AI.

Since you are talking about a particular story, it's best to qualify it with a 'the'.

Fifty-seven years ago, there were only room-sized, unintelligent computers whose memory system consisted of paper tapes or plastic tapes, and the Houston control center was filled with (tobacco) smoke, yet they were able to send Captain (Neil) Armstrong, Co(Buzz) Aldrin (oops, this spelling has been pointed out as wrong by the red wavy underline), and, oops, I don't remember the third crew member, sorry for him (Michael Collins), sorry, to the moon. Fifty-seven years ago, there were only room-sized, unintelligent computers whose memory system consisted of paper or plastic tape, and the Houston control center was filled with (tobacco) smoke, yet they were able to send Captain (Neil) Armstrong, (Buzz) Aldrin (oops, this spelling has been pointed out as wrong by the red wavy underline), and, oops, I don't remember the third crew member (Michael Collins), sorry, to the moon.

I also didn't remember Michael Collins. I don't think he got to step on the moon. You were close, though - you just mixed up Aldrin + Collins!

Fifty-seven years ago, there were only room-sized, unintelligent computers whose memory system consisted of paper tapes or plastic tapes, and the Houston control center was filled with smoke, yet they were able to send Captain Armstrong, CoAldrin (oops, this spelling has been pointed out as wrong by the red wavy underline), and, oops, I don't remember the third crew member, sorry for him, to the moon. Fifty-seven years ago, there were only room-sized, unintelligent computers whose memory system consisted of paper tapes or plastic tapes, and the Houston control center was filled with smoke, yet they were able to send Captain Armstrong, Aldrin (oops, this spelling has been pointed out as wrong by the red wavy underline), and, oops, I don't remember the third crew member, sorry for him, to the moon.

Fifty-seven years ago, there were only room-sized, unintelligent computers whose memory system consisted of paper tapes or plastic tapes, and the Houston control center was filled with smoke, yet they were able to send Captain Armstrong, CoAldrin (oops, this spelling has been pointed out as wrong by the red wavy underline), and, oops, I don't remember the third crew member, sorry for him, to the moon. Fifty-seven years ago, there were only room-sized, unintelligent computers whose memory system consisted of paper tapes or plastic tapes, and the Houston control center was filled with smoke, yet they were able to send Captain Armstrong, Aldrin (oops, this spelling has been pointed out as wrong by the red wavy underline), and, oops, I don't remember the third crew member, sorry for him, to the moon.

The third member was the pilot, Michael Collins :) (Though I had to look this up)

Probaossibly, humans in the 1960s were much more intelligent than present humans. Possibly, humans in the 1960s were much more intelligent than present humans.

Probably hHumans in the 1960s were probably much more intelligent than present humans. Humans in the 1960s were probably much more intelligent than present humans.

I'm proud to say that, for my sake.) I'm proud to say that.)

Or, I'm proud to say that I'm not a smoker.

"Apollo" seems like a funnyn unusual name because I believe that the American people in Houston at that time were supposed to be almost all Christians,; believers in a monotheistic religion. "Apollo" seems like an unusual name because I believe that the American people in Houston at that time were almost all Christians; believers in a monotheistic religion.

However, Greek gods were plural deities, part of polytheismt beliefs. However, Greek gods part of polytheist beliefs.

I'm not sure if "plural gods" works here. It makes me think of a god that has multiple parts or forms.

Why wasn't God furious that theyand punish them for nameding it after the name of a god from another religion and punished them? Why wasn't God furious and punish them for naming it after the name of a god from another religion?

The tenses between "wasn't furious" and "punished them" felt strange, but I can't clearly explain why. It's similar to the way you wrote it in Japanese, though 「神」は怒って彼らを罰しなかった。We don't use past tense for both 怒る and 罰する.

Why wasn't God furious that they named it after the name of a god from another religion and? Shouldn't he have punished them? Why wasn't God furious that they named it after a god from another religion? Shouldn't he have punished them?

- It feels more natural to break this sentence into two. I think it's because God did not actually punish them, so that segment also remains speculative/questioning.