March 31, 2020
Agnostids (Integrated)
The listening content completely refutes the reading passage in the fact that three possible explanations about how agnostics may have lived. First, the reading suggests that the agnostids may have been free-swimming predators that prey on smaller organisms in the ancient ocean, just like others arthropods did. The listening section, however, mentions that all of those arthropods had large, well-developed eyes. Vision is the best way to track its prey. But agnostids were sometimes completely blind which was seems to rule out the idea. In addition, if agnostids did chase after prey, they would have had special sensory organ to help them find prey, but there is no evidence of this on the fossil record.
Second, the reading thinks that the agnostids were possible living in the seafloor as well as arthropods did. Yet, the lecturer indicates that seafloor dwellers do not have ability to move fast or far, they move slowly across the seafloor. The dwellers stay in local areas instead of moving to new areas. But, many agnostids were able to move from one area to another pretty fast. So, it would be highly unusual for seafloor dwellers.
Finally, the author says that agnostids lived on larger organisms as parasites. In contrast, the listening part asserts that about parasites, their population are not very large. They have to stay in certain limits since if there are too many parasites, they would kill off the host. The evidence of agnostids population was very large, so it seems to rule out the theory.
The listening content completely refutes the reading passage in the fact that's assertions while discussing three possible explanations about how agnostics may have lived.
First, the reading suggests that the agnostids may have been free-swimming predators that preyed on smaller organisms in the ancient ocean, just likeas others arthropods did.
The listening section, however, mentions that all of those other arthropods had large, well-developed eyes.
Vision is the best way to track its prey.
But agnostids were sometimes completely blind which was seems to rule out theis idea.
In addition, if agnostids did chase after prey, they would have had to have a special sensory organ to help them find prey, but there is no evidence of this on the fossil record.
Second, the reading thinks that the agnostids were possibley living ied on the seafloor as well aslike other arthropods did.
Yet, the lecturer indicates that seafloor dwellers do not have ability to move fast or far; rather, they move slowly across the seafloor.
These bottom dwellers stay in local areas instead of moving to new areas.
But, many agnostids were able to move from one area to another pretty fastlatively quickly.
So, it would be highly unusual for seafloor dwellers.
Finally, the author says that agnostids lived on larger organisms as parasites.
In contrast, the listening part asserts that about parasites, their populations are not very large.
They have to stay within certain limits since if there are too many parasites, they would kill off the host.
The evidence ofshows that the agnostids population was very large, so it seems to rule out theis theory.
|
Agnostids (Integrated) |
|
The listening content completely refutes the reading passage in the fact that three possible explanations about how agnostics may have lived. The listening content completely refutes the reading passage |
|
First, the reading suggests that the agnostids may have been free-swimming predators that prey on smaller organisms in the ancient ocean, just like others arthropods did. First, the reading suggests that the agnostids may have been free-swimming predators that preyed on smaller organisms in the ancient ocean, just |
|
The listening section, however, mentions that all of those arthropods had large, well-developed eyes. The listening section, however, mentions that all of those other arthropods had large, well-developed eyes. |
|
Vision is the best way to track its prey. Vision is the best way to track |
|
But agnostids were sometimes completely blind which was seems to rule out the idea. But agnostids were sometimes completely blind which |
|
In addition, if agnostids did chase after prey, they would have had special sensory organ to help them find prey, but there is no evidence of this on the fossil record. In addition, if agnostids did chase after prey, they would have had to have a special sensory organ to help them find prey, but there is no evidence of this on the fossil record. |
|
Second, the reading thinks that the agnostids were possible living in the seafloor as well as arthropods did. Second, the reading thinks that the agnostids |
|
Yet, the lecturer indicates that seafloor dwellers do not have ability to move fast or far, they move slowly across the seafloor. Yet, the lecturer indicates that seafloor dwellers do not have ability to move fast or far; rather, they move slowly across the seafloor. |
|
The dwellers stay in local areas instead of moving to new areas. These bottom dwellers stay in local areas instead of moving to new areas. |
|
But, many agnostids were able to move from one area to another pretty fast. But, many agnostids were able to move from one area to another |
|
So, it would be highly unusual for seafloor dwellers. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Finally, the author says that agnostids lived on larger organisms as parasites. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
In contrast, the listening part asserts that about parasites, their population are not very large. In contrast, the listening part asserts that |
|
They have to stay in certain limits since if there are too many parasites, they would kill off the host. They have to stay within certain limits since if there are too many parasites, they would kill off the host. |
|
The evidence of agnostids population was very large, so it seems to rule out the theory. The evidence |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium