July 19, 2021
Active learning 1
First and foremost is to distinguish between active and passive learning techniques. Passive learning is every form of studying which is only accepted (input) but doesn't have to be an active part of the process. For Example, if you listen to something and there is no interaction or even an attached task afterward. Such is when you only read something but don’t activate the process: you don’t ask questions in the meantime, you don’t reflect on what you read, you don’t summarize, and so on and so forth.
Az első és legfontosabb az, hogy elkülönítsünk passzív és aktív tanulási technikákat. Passzív tanulást jelent minden olyan tanulási forma, amit csak befogadunk (input van), de nem kell aktív, cselekvő részesévé váljunk a folyamatnak. Ilyen például, ha valamit csak hallgatsz, és nincs semmilyen interakció, vagy akár hozzácsatolt feladat utána. Ilyen, amikor valamit csak olvasol, de nem teszed aktívvá a folyamatot: nem teszel fel kérdéseket közben, nem reflektálsz az olvasottakra, nem foglalod össze stb.
Active learning 1
First and foremost is to distinguish between active and passive learning techniques.
I think this would sound a little more natural as something like "First and foremost, we should distinguish" or "First and foremost, it's important to distinguish". But it's okay, makes sense.
Passive learning is every form of studying which isere you only accepted ( input) but, and doesn't have to be an active part of the process.
Or "every form of studying that involves only accepting input, and not being an active part of the process." Or "every form of studying where input is only accepted, and not actively processed." Many different ways to say this :) But the way you had it was quite muddled.
I changed "but" to "and" because "only" seems to provide enough contrast on its own, enough limitation. "but" would definitely be appropriate if "only" wasn't there. "He will only unlock the door, not open it" - "He will unlock the door, but not open it".
For Eexample, if you listen to something and there is no interaction or even any attached task afterward.
A little more natural to verb here, "but don't interact with it or complete any attached task afterward."
Such iIt's when you only read something but don’t activatmake the process active: you don’t ask questions in the meantime, you don’t reflect on what you read, you don’t summarize, and so on and so forth.
You can use "such" like this, but it's quite rare. "activate" doesn't quite mean the same thing as "make active", it's more about *awakening* than transforming. A machine is dormant, then you activate it, and it begins running - you didn't transform it, you just caused it to function.
So it's very close, you could say something like "activate your mind", "activate your comprehension skills", something like that. But here I get the sense that you have a process that already exists, is already functioning, already in motion - reading - and you want to transform it so that it can be described as "active", and that's "make active".
July 19, 2021
thank you!!!
|
Active learning 1 This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
First and foremost is to distinguish between active and passive learning techniques. First and foremost is to distinguish between active and passive learning techniques. I think this would sound a little more natural as something like "First and foremost, we should distinguish" or "First and foremost, it's important to distinguish". But it's okay, makes sense. |
|
Passive learning is every form of studying which is only accepted (input) but doesn't have to be an active part of the process. Passive learning is every form of studying wh Or "every form of studying that involves only accepting input, and not being an active part of the process." Or "every form of studying where input is only accepted, and not actively processed." Many different ways to say this :) But the way you had it was quite muddled. I changed "but" to "and" because "only" seems to provide enough contrast on its own, enough limitation. "but" would definitely be appropriate if "only" wasn't there. "He will only unlock the door, not open it" - "He will unlock the door, but not open it". |
|
For Example, if you listen to something and there is no interaction or even an attached task afterward. For A little more natural to verb here, "but don't interact with it or complete any attached task afterward." |
|
Such is when you only read something but don’t activate the process: you don’t ask questions in the meantime, you don’t reflect on what you read, you don’t summarize, and so on and so forth.
You can use "such" like this, but it's quite rare. "activate" doesn't quite mean the same thing as "make active", it's more about *awakening* than transforming. A machine is dormant, then you activate it, and it begins running - you didn't transform it, you just caused it to function. So it's very close, you could say something like "activate your mind", "activate your comprehension skills", something like that. But here I get the sense that you have a process that already exists, is already functioning, already in motion - reading - and you want to transform it so that it can be described as "active", and that's "make active". |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium