Feb. 28, 2022
Part no. 49.
This summary was deliberately written in the present tense (analyse it as if it’s taking place as you read it).
Sergeant Brunswick is walking across Brighton, his mind buzzing with thoughts. He feels excited and yet defeated. Should he hear of the grim event that has just unfolded at the seafront—journalist Harry Jupiter being knocked off the pier dead* into the water—Brunswick will likely have a breakdown. So it’s just as well that he knows nothing yet, otherwise that last fragment of hope which he still clings on to would probably be crushed.
Anyway, it has painly dawned on Brunswick that last night he made some unwise and basic mistakes at the crime scene. He keeps telling himself that he should’ve known better. He’s probably right there. In fact, overlooking a glass probably containing fingertips of the culprit is beyond doubt a negligent behaviour**. He was so engrossed in pursuing his angle on Joanna Carver’s guilt that he had become oblivious to anything that didn’t fit that view. Reflecting now on that, Brunswick feels regret. Luckily for him, the forensic team did*** its job properly and did*** not fail to collect the glass as evidence.
*By “dead” I meant that Jupiter died as a result of this.
**Would it be fine to say, “is (beyond doubt) being negligent”?
***”did (not)” or “has/have (not)”? From my point of view, Brunswick should know when the forensic team scoured the crime scene. I don’t know if that’s relevant.
Sergeant Brunswick is walking across Brighton, his mind buzzing with thoughts.
He feels excited and yet defeated.
Should he hear of the grim event that has just unfolded at the seafront—journalist Harry Jupiter being knocked off the pier dead* into the water—Brunswick will likely have a breakdown.
@avacadohats is correct, "dead" in this sentence is ambiguous.
Examples: "I hit the snooker ball dead into the pocket."
"His cat starred dead ahead out the window."
So it’s just as well that he knows nothing yet, otherwise that last fragment of hope which he still clings on to would probably be crushed.
You could also say "(...) which he still clings on" rather than "on to", both are perfectly fine options here.
Anyway, it has painfully dawned on Brunswick that last night he made some unwise and basic mistakes at the crime scene.
I really love this sentence! Very clever use of the phrase "it has dawned on" him, in contrast to the literal time period he is reflecting on, "last night".
I'd only suggest that you remove the conjunction in "unwise and basic" - you could just use a comma here instead, "unwise, basic mistakes".
He keeps telling himself that he should’ve known better.
He’s probably right there.
In fact, overlooking a key piece of evidence - namely, a glass probably containing the fingertipprints of the culprit - is beyond doubt a negligent behaviour**.
Cool, and yeah you can also say "is beyond doubt being negligent", or I think this sounds even more natural, "is beyond doubt pure negligence".
He was so engroobsessed in pursuing his angle on Joanna Carver’s guilt, that he had become oblivious to anything that didn’t fit that view.
I would definitely add a comma after "guilt".
Reflecting now on that now, Brunswick feels regret.
Luckily for him, the forensic team did*** its job properly and did*** not fail tosuccessfully collected the glass as evidence.
Yes, your sentence was fine. Just offering an alternative :)
Feedback
Excellent writing!
Should he hear of the grim event that has just unfolded at the seafront—journalist Harry Jupiter being stabbed to death and knocked off the pier dead* into the water—Brunswick will likely have a breakdown.
In response to your question, this does not make it clear that Harry Jupiter died as a result of being knocked off the pier. You would need to add some detail to this, such as he was killed before entering the water (e.g. he was stabbed with a knife) or he drowned as a result of entering the water.
So it’s just as well that he knows nothing yet, otherwise that last fragment of hope which he still clings on to would probably be crushed.
Anyway, it has painly dawned on BrunswickBrunswick had come to the painful realisation that last night he made some unwise and basic mistakes at the crime scene.
In fact, overlooking a glass probably containingthat almost certainly had fingertipprints of the culprit on it is beyond doubt a negligent behaviour**.
You can use beyond doubt in the way that you have here.
He was so engrossed in pursuing his anglehad been so fixated on Joanna Carver’s being guilty that he had become oblivious to anything that didn’t fit that view.
Reflecting now on that now, Brunswick feels regret.
Luckily for him, the forensic team did*** its job properly and did*** not fail to collect the glass as evidence.
This is correct - you would say 'and did not fail to collect the glass as evidence'.
Part no. |
49. |
A Shot in the Dark - 49 |
This summary was deliberately written in the present tense (analyse it as if it’s taking place as you read it). |
Sergeant Brunswick is walking across Brighton, his mind buzzing with thoughts. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
He feels excited and yet defeated. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
Should he hear of the grim event that has just unfolded at the seafront—journalist Harry Jupiter being knocked off the pier dead* into the water—Brunswick will likely have a breakdown. Should he hear of the grim event that has just unfolded at the seafront—journalist Harry Jupiter being stabbed to death and knocked off the pier In response to your question, this does not make it clear that Harry Jupiter died as a result of being knocked off the pier. You would need to add some detail to this, such as he was killed before entering the water (e.g. he was stabbed with a knife) or he drowned as a result of entering the water. Should he hear of the grim event that has just unfolded at the seafront—journalist Harry Jupiter being knocked off the pier dead* into the water—Brunswick will likely have a breakdown. @avacadohats is correct, "dead" in this sentence is ambiguous. Examples: "I hit the snooker ball dead into the pocket." "His cat starred dead ahead out the window." |
So it’s just as well that he knows nothing yet, otherwise that last fragment of hope which he still clings on to would probably be crushed. This sentence has been marked as perfect! So it’s just as well that he knows nothing yet, otherwise that last fragment of hope which he still clings on to would probably be crushed. You could also say "(...) which he still clings on" rather than "on to", both are perfectly fine options here. |
Anyway, it has painly dawned on Brunswick that last night he made some unwise and basic mistakes at the crime scene.
Anyway, it has painfully dawned on Brunswick that last night he made some unwise and basic mistakes at the crime scene. I really love this sentence! Very clever use of the phrase "it has dawned on" him, in contrast to the literal time period he is reflecting on, "last night". I'd only suggest that you remove the conjunction in "unwise and basic" - you could just use a comma here instead, "unwise, basic mistakes". |
He keeps telling himself that he should’ve known better. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
He’s probably right there. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
In fact, overlooking a glass probably containing fingertips of the culprit is beyond doubt a negligent behaviour**. In fact, overlooking a glass You can use beyond doubt in the way that you have here. In fact, overlooking a key piece of evidence - namely, a glass probably containing the finger Cool, and yeah you can also say "is beyond doubt being negligent", or I think this sounds even more natural, "is beyond doubt pure negligence". |
He was so engrossed in pursuing his angle on Joanna Carver’s guilt that he had become oblivious to anything that didn’t fit that view. He He was so I would definitely add a comma after "guilt". |
Reflecting now on that, Brunswick feels regret. Reflecting Reflecting |
Luckily for him, the forensic team did*** its job properly and did*** not fail to collect the glass as evidence. Luckily for him, the forensic team did*** its job properly and did*** not fail to collect the glass as evidence. This is correct - you would say 'and did not fail to collect the glass as evidence'. Luckily for him, the forensic team did*** its job properly and Yes, your sentence was fine. Just offering an alternative :) |
*By “dead” I meant that Jupiter died as a result of this. |
**Would it be fine to say, “is (beyond doubt) being negligent”? |
***”did (not)” or “has/have (not)”? |
From my point of view, Brunswick should know when the forensic team scoured the crime scene. |
I don’t know if that’s relevant. |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium